Voter Guide: Las Lomitas seeks $60 million for schools

Money would be earmarked for additional classrooms, upgraded infrastructure

Sixty million dollars is a lot of money. The Las Lomitas Elementary School District is hoping voters think it'll be money well spent and will approve Measure S, a $60 million bond measure, on the Nov. 5 ballot. The measure must win favor with at least 55 percent of the voters to pass.

Like other school districts in the Almanac's coverage area, Las Lomitas is bracing for further growth in enrollment, which has risen 40 percent during the past decade. Carolyn Chow, the district's chief business officer, said the schools expect a net growth of 46 students next year, after adding 70 this year.

The bond measure would allow the two schools in the district -- Las Lomitas (K-3) in Atherton and La Entrada (4-8) in Menlo Park -- to build new two-story buildings, eliminate 18 portable classrooms, and renovate existing facilities, according to the ballot statement. It would not include complete reconstruction of the campuses, but instead would tear down up to one-third of the current structures to make room for new classrooms, according to the school board.

The California constitution requires the listing of specific projects to be funded from the bond revenue. Specific projects earmarked for Measure S money include replacing plumbing infrastructure; updating the electrical system to allow wireless networking; replacing windows and other environmental features to improve energy efficiency; and adding sprinklers as well as fire safety doors.

The district estimates that property owners would be assessed $30 a year per $100,000 of taxable property. According to the school board, the payments would likely be ongoing through 2045. The measure calls for the appointment of a citizens' oversight committee to monitor how the bond money gets spent.

The school board voted 5-0 in August to put the bond measure on the ballot.

Diana Sunshine, co-chair of the "Yes on S" committee, said the district has seen "a great wave of families" moving into the area from other Bay Area cities to attend a top-performing school like La Entrada. The district had 900 students when her daughter, now in the seventh grade, started attending. Now there are about 1,400. About 20 percent of current students attend class in the portables.

The school district does have other revenue sources to draw upon, namely income from two other properties leased out at a point when enrollment fell decades ago and the district closed its own schools on those sites; and the Las Lomitas Education Foundation, which raised $2.8 million for the district for the 2013-14 school year. Those two sources combined contribute 25 percent of the district's annual revenue, Ms. Sunshine said, and allow the schools to continue offering courses that other public schools have eliminated, such as four foreign language options: Mandarin, Latin, Spanish and French. In addition, the district collects income from an annual $311 parcel tax approved in 2007.

The district has leased one campus, in Ladera, to Woodland School, a private elementary school, for more than 30 years. The other, in Menlo Park, has been rented out to Phillips Brooks, also a private elementary school, for about the same amount of time.

"We looked at taking back the lease properties, but decided against that because it gives us really good, strong annual revenue," Ms. Sunshine explained.

School board president Richard Ginn said additional factors led to the decision not to pursue reclaiming the leased properties. The Ladera site, which is several miles away and west of Interstate 280, would create a geographical divide for the school community. And while the district would lose significant revenue from the lease of the sites, it would have to spend more for additional staff.

"We would still have to go to voters for money," Mr. Ginn said.

Beyond replacing all portables, the specifics of how the bond money would be spent if the measure passes will be something for the school board and community to work on, according to Mr. Ginn.

"The main priority is classrooms for kids," he said. If the bond measure passes, the school board will get to work on what specifically will be done, and create a committee to sort through the remaining priorities.

No one presented a ballot argument against Measure S, which may not be surprising in light of what Ms. Sunshine described as overwhelming support for the bond measure among parents and community members.

"This is our first bond in 12 years," she said. "We take this very seriously and we want to be as prudent as we can."

Renee Batti contributed to this story.


Like this comment
Posted by peninsula resident
a resident of Menlo-Atherton High School
on Oct 10, 2013 at 3:42 pm

Ms. Sunshine said:
> because it gives us really good, strong annual revenue

Uh, excuse me, but if the leased campuses bring in as much as you're claiming, then LL should have been using THAT money to fund building out the overcrowded schools. Hello?

MPCSD needs "only" 23 million in Measure W to handle increased enrollment, and does not have two "really good, strong annual revenue" streams from leased campuses, unlike LL.

In other words, LL has more revenue streams yet needs a bond measure almost THREE TIMES the bond MPCSD is asking, to accomplish the SAME GOAL.

MPCSD will be bringing another school online with 23million, but LLSD will bring online ZERO campuses with 60million.

This is just bad management. We need more schools, not bigger schools.

Vote YES on W, NO on S

Las Lomitas is blessed with numerous sources of revenue; even the School district, the co-chair for "Yes on S" and this article make that clear.

This area needs MORE schools, not bigger schools. MPCSD is asking for

Like this comment
Posted by A Concerned Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 pm

If you're like me you just received your property tax bill. You might have noticed it's kind of high. You might have also noticed your already paying $311 to Los Lomitas school district. Measure S will add $30 per 100K assessed value of your property which amounts to hundreds of dollars per year for pretty much any homeowner in this area. This is ongoing through 2045 so if you vote for measure S you're literally signing up for thousands of dollars more in taxes.

Also, where did the $60,000,000 price tag come from? That's a lot of zeros. You could buy a pretty fine mansion in Atherton for $20 million and that includes the land! It makes me wonder what on earth they're planning to build that requires $60 million dollars.

For once can we say no to fiscal insanity? Vote NO on Measure S!

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

By Laura Stec | 22 comments | 1,512 views

Are We Really Up To This?
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 929 views

Couples: Initiators and Implementors
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 737 views

Don't be a ghost
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 496 views