Hanretty released from prison, appeals court order


By Barbara Wood, Special to the Almanac

Tim Hanretty, the former Woodside and Portola Valley school official who was imprisoned for embezzlement and misappropriating public funds in 2012, has been released after serving a year of his two-year sentence and has taken steps to appeal a court order to repay $2.67 million to the Woodside Elementary School District.

Mr. Hanretty's former attorney, Michael Markowitz of Danville, said he has filed a notice with the court of appeals on Mr. Hanretty's behalf to give him more time to appeal the restitution order. Mr. Markowitz said he has asked for a court-appointed lawyer to handle the appeal for Mr. Hanretty.

Mr. Hanretty, the former Portola Valley School District Superintendent and Woodside Elementary School District finance officer, pleaded no contest to six felony charges of embezzlement and misappropriating public funds in both school districts in July of 2012 and was sentenced to two years in prison the following October.

In Woodside he was accused of forging documents that allowed a loan of up to $3 million to be made to the district, despite the fact that the school board had approved borrowing only $632,000. He eventually obtained a loan of $2.6 million, which district officials say was spent on school projects. He changed the loan terms from a 10-year payback to a 21-year payback.

In Portola Valley further investigation found Mr. Hanretty had turned in $100,926 in invoices for work on his own home, to be paid by the district's solar panel fund.

Beth Polito, superintendent of the Woodside Elementary School District, said the district learned from the district's county counsel, John Nibbelin, that Mr. Hanretty had been released from prison. The district has asked Mr. Hanretty's probation officer to have him "steer clear of us because it's awkward and uncomfortable," Superintendent Polito said.

In September Mr. Hanretty had been ordered to repay the Woodside district about $2.67 million to reimburse the cost of the loan he had fraudulently obtained, plus interest costs and the costs involved with uncovering the crime.

That total – nearly $2.937 million -- was reduced to reflect $20,000 Mr. Hanretty has already paid toward restitution and $250,000 from insurance payments to the district.

Mr. Markowitz had argued that the Woodside district had benefited from all the loan proceeds, and had fought the district's attempt for restitution based on an unauthorized debt that it was saddled with. The district sought about $3.63 million in restitution.

Superintendent Polito said the district realizes there are "substantial obstacles to any significant recovery of the restitution," but they are working with the probation department to try to get as much as possible repaid to the district. Superintendent Polito emphasized that the district is not in financial trouble and should "be able to meet all of their financial obligations in the current year and in all future years."

Mr. Hanretty had already been ordered to reimburse the Portola Valley School District for the money spent on his home, plus associated costs of investigating the theft for a total of nearly $182,000. By September he had repaid almost $121,000, according to Karen Lucian, the district's administrative coordinator.

The misappropriation of public money was first discovered in 2011 when a Woodside school board member questioned the amount of debt service the district was paying.

After investigation uncovered the dubious loan, Mr. Hanretty resigned in January as the Portola Valley district superintendent, a job he began in August 2010. Before that, he had served as chief business officer of both districts.


Like this comment
Posted by Karen Miller
a resident of Portola Valley: other
on Dec 10, 2013 at 7:54 am

Did the school district benefit from the projects? If they did, it is unfair to saddle Tim with those debts. He has paid his debts....let him be.

Like this comment
Posted by Neighbor
a resident of Portola Valley: Westridge
on Dec 10, 2013 at 11:39 am

@Karen, I disagree.

That's like me stealing your credit card, but only using it to install a $100k swimming pool in your yard while you're out of town. A pool that you don't want and can't afford and will spend years paying off.

Are you arguing in such a case that you've not suffered financially and there should be no restitution?

Like this comment
Posted by Susan Smith
a resident of Woodside: other
on Dec 10, 2013 at 4:28 pm

Helen is correct: the school has certainly flourished and utilized that money. The Woodside Elementary School Board should also be accountable, as a check and balance obligation? What shoddy finance and total lack of accountability by all parties.

Like this comment
Posted by concerned
a resident of another community
on Dec 10, 2013 at 7:50 pm

The damage to PVSD goes way beyond the 110 K +plus he stole. Fiscal misappropriation and mismanagement has left ongoing financial turmoil.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 4,578 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,055 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 517 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 445 views