Man who fled Menlo Park police after ramming car enters plea


A man who rammed a police patrol car last month while fleeing, in a stolen car, from a Menlo Park police officer after a traffic stop pleaded no contest to auto theft charges Wednesday, according to the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office.

In exchange for the no contest plea, Ivan Gonzalez, 24, will receive a sentence of no more than 90 days in jail and may serve that sentence in a residential drug treatment program, prosecutors said. A hearing to consider the treatment program is scheduled for June 19.

Gonzalez, a San Jose resident, had been pulled over in a 1990 Buick LaSabre for a broken taillight and expired registration at Verbena and Camellia drives on May 4.

But Gonzalez sped away, driving at 45 mph on residential streets until he lost control of the car and crashed into a fence about a fifth of a mile down the road, prosecutors said.

The officer chased him there and pulled up behind the LaSabre. Gonzalez then threw the car in reverse and rammed into the officer's patrol car, prosecutors said.

The officer, who wasn't injured, arrested Gonzalez and realized the LaSabre had been stolen. Gonzalez fled to avoid being arrested for auto theft and for several arrest warrants out of San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, prosecutors said.

He had been charged with three felonies, including evading police, driving without a license and auto theft, but ultimately pleaded no contest to only the auto theft charge, prosecutors said.

He had been also charged in misdemeanor cases involving identity theft and drugs. Prosecutors agreed to dismiss those charges on the condition that he pay restitution in those cases. A restitution hearing is scheduled for June 23.

Gonzalez remains in custody on $75,000 bail, prosecutors said.

— Bay City News Service


Like this comment
Posted by Robert D.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jun 14, 2015 at 9:45 am

Robert D. is a registered user.

I am far from the expert, but every time I read these type of issues, I think the Officer must have less than 5 years in. Good/Bad with that. POGO can correct me, but I believe less than 5 years they do not get the benefits at a City... so the opponents - yes, he should be back at work. The proponents, should he be back - is he really injured and cannot do his job, but knows he/she cannot get benefits. POGO / Peter?

Like this comment
Posted by pogo
a resident of Woodside: other
on Jun 14, 2015 at 3:41 pm

pogo is a registered user.

My apologies but I'm not sure what you are asking. This officer wasn't injured.

Are you trying to find out the benefits IF the officer was injured?

Like this comment
Posted by Alice
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jun 15, 2015 at 9:59 am

Don't eat brownies and drive.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Babka bakery to open Thursday in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 10 comments | 7,086 views

Ten Tips for Teens and Young Adults to Survive a Dysfunctional Family
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,543 views

UCSB's CCS program
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,360 views

Farm Bill Passes Congress
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 1,035 views

What is a Life?
By Aldis Petriceks | 0 comments | 701 views