Supreme Court upholds same-sex marriage

Assemblyman Rich Gordon issues celebratory statement

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled by a 5-4 vote today that the federal Constitution provides a right to same-sex marriage.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority decision, "The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment couples of the same-sex may not be deprived of that right and that liberty.

"The Court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry."

Assemblyman Rich Gordon (D-Menlo Park), who married Dennis McShane in 2008, issued the following statement this morning: "Marrying my partner of 32 years was one of the greatest days of my life. It was an experience and an opportunity that many loving couples across the country have been denied until now.

"This Supreme Court decision, which finds that states cannot prohibit same-sex marriage, is historic not only for the LGBT community, but also for all Americans who value fairness and equality.

"The institution of marriage provides over 1,000 legal and financial privileges. More importantly, it is a powerful symbol of a couple's love and commitment. It is something to be cherished and shared."

The court also said states must recognize marriages legally performed in other states.

About three dozen states, including California, now allow same-sex marriage, as a result of either decisions by lower federal courts or actions by state courts, state legislatures or popular vote.

The high court ruled in four cases originating in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan and Tennessee, where bans on same-sex marriage were in effect. The couples in the four cases were seeking either the right to marry or the right to have out-of-state marriages recognized. They appealed after a federal appeals court in Cincinnati upheld the same-sex marriage prohibitions in those four states.

Kennedy was joined in the majority by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Kennedy wrote, referring to the plaintiffs in the four cases, "It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage.

"Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization's oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law.

"The Constitution grants them that right," the court majority said.

Each of the four dissenting justices wrote a separate opinion.

Chief Justice John Roberts said in his dissent that decisions on same-sex marriage should be left up to individual states acting within the democratic process through either their legislatures or voter initiatives.

Roberts wrote: "If you are among the many Americans -- of whatever sexual orientation -- who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's decision... But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it," Roberts wrote.

The other dissenting justices were Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

Scalia wrote, "This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves."

— Bay City News Service

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


6 people like this
Posted by Water
a resident of another community
on Jun 26, 2015 at 8:10 pm

Scalia needs to retire.

6 people like this
Posted by Stella
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jun 26, 2015 at 10:56 pm

A great end to a week thst stated so poorly.

Down come racist flags, replaced by rainbow flags.

Happy Pride, y'all.....

6 people like this
Posted by SteveC
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Jun 27, 2015 at 7:16 am

SteveC is a registered user.

Scalia is an angry old man. Retire, your views are out dated.

10 people like this
Posted by Stella
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jun 27, 2015 at 9:45 am

Did Clarence Thomas engage in debate, or even ask a single question?

Just follows along with Scalito.

Love conquers hate.

Side note - Rand Paul is awfully quiet in representing the Libertarian "guvmint out of marriage " POV.

Like this comment
Posted by SteveC
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Jun 27, 2015 at 3:45 pm

SteveC is a registered user.

I doubt it. He doesn't have any original thoughts, just follows the others.

Like this comment
Posted by Stop the Trolls
a resident of another community
on Jun 27, 2015 at 3:55 pm

[Posts removed. Please comment on the topic, not other posters.]

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Contemporary Indian restaurant, Ettan, headed to Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 6,091 views

Good News: The New Menlo Park Rail Subcommittee Hits A Home Run
By Dana Hendrickson | 12 comments | 1,722 views

Premarital and Couples: Tips for Hearing (Listening) and Being Known
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,358 views

Two degrees can do all that?
By Sherry Listgarten | 3 comments | 893 views

Tame, Maim and Claim the Wild Sea Vegetable
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 480 views


Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More