Labor board rulings lead to deal with firefighters


A ruling by a state labor-relations board led the Menlo Park Fire Protection District and its firefighters, who have been working without a contract for seven years, to settle their differences and agree to a new contract.

Firefighters will be receiving a total of $1.5 million from the district as a consequence of the district's having engaged in unlawful piecemeal bargaining and acting unilaterally, according to a set of rulings by the state Public Employment Relations Board.

The rulings, issued in August 2014, resolved two sets of charges brought by firefighters from San Mateo County Firefighters Local 2400 against the fire district, and established a context over the past 11 months for the two parties to conclude years of "protracted and contentious negotiations," Fire Chief Harold Schapelhouman said in a press release.

The employment relations board ordered the district to pay a total of $460,968 to 30 employees and another total of $1,063,143 to 92 employees. The payments include 7 percent interest and are intended to make the employees whole for lost wages and benefits, according to copies of the rulings recently posted on the fire district's website.

The district could have filed an appeal, "but (the fire board) trusted the Union, my staff and me to collaboratively work out the details of the settlements and, more importantly, put together a new contract that resolved all outstanding issues and met both party's needs," the chief said.

The five-member fire district governing board approved the posting on the web of a tentative contract in a 4-1 vote on July 7, with Chuck Bernstein dissenting. The final agreement, which the board will consider for approval on Aug. 25, is expected to cost the district a total of $9.8 million over four years, Chief Schapelhouman said.

In 2014, a firefighter-engineer in the middle of the pay range made a base annual salary of $111,700, according to the memorandum of understanding accompanying the new contract.

Firefighters' average base salaries would rise by up to 9 percent in the 2014-15 budget year just ended, and by up to 3 percent in each of the following three years.

Under the new deal, firefighters would pay 12 percent of pension costs, retroactive to 2014-15, up from the 9 percent they are paying now. This will save the district around $1.2 million over four years, the chief said. Firefighters would also pay 10 percent of the costs for health care coverage.

The contract includes a stipend for firefighters who live within 60 miles of the district, starting at $200 a month and rising to $300 by the end of the contract.

Go to to see the contract documents. The documents are available for public comment at the fire district's website until the close of business on Monday, Aug. 24.

Editor's note: An earlier version of this story was incorrect in stating that the board of the Menlo Park Fire Protection District had approved a tentative agreement on July 7, 2015. The board had approved the website posting of the agreement.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jul 30, 2015 at 1:21 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

"The five-member fire district governing board approved a tentative contract in a 4-1 vote on July 7, with Chuck Bernstein dissenting. "


The motion was to submit the tentative agreement to the public for their review, it was NOT a motion to approve the agreement.

Here is the official text :

"The Fire Board voted 4-1 in closed session (President Kiraly, Vice President Silano, Directors Carpenter and Ianson in favor, Director Bernstein against) to authorize the posting of the Tentative Agreement between the District and Firefighters Local 2400, along with supporting documentation, for the mandatory 30-day sunshine period. The Board will consider ratification of the final agreement at its regular meeting scheduled for August 25, 2015.”

To be clear, what Bernstein voted NO on was submitting this tentative agreement to the public for their review.

I have no idea why Bernstein did not want the public to have the opportunity for review and comment on this tentative agreement.

There was no Board vote on the tentative agreement and there will not be until after the tentative agreement has been available for public comment for 30 days.

Peter Carpenter

Like this comment
Posted by Foggy Bottom
a resident of another community
on Jul 30, 2015 at 1:43 pm

"I have no idea why Bernstein did not want the public to have the opportunity for review..."

during a CLOSED session?

Like this comment
Posted by Dave Boyce
Almanac staff writer
on Jul 30, 2015 at 1:43 pm

Dave Boyce is a registered user.

The story has been corrected. Thanks.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

After experiencing harassment, owner of Zareen's restaurants speaks out about Islamophobia, racism
By Elena Kadvany | 28 comments | 7,622 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 2,512 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 2,463 views

Good News: The New Menlo Park Rail Subcommittee Hits A Home Run
By Dana Hendrickson | 12 comments | 1,642 views

Premarital and Couples: Tips for Hearing (Listening) and Being Known
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,045 views


Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More