News

Atherton must act to weather winter storms, report says

 

If the coming winter in the Bay Area is as rainy as long-range forecasts have been predicting, Atherton will have problems handling storm-water runoff as it makes its way to and out of the Atherton Channel.

The City Council met Sept. 2 to hear a report from San Jose engineering firm NV5 Inc. on an update to the town's 2014 drainage master plan -- specifically, how to store storm-water runoff and prevent flooding in the channel.

Three issues topped the priority list:

● A water flow bottleneck exists in the form of a culvert on Marsh Road east of the intersection with Middlefield Road. Is it feasible to temporarily detain storm water in upstream basins, perhaps at Holbrook-Palmer Park, or the private Menlo Circus Club, or Las Lomitas Elementary School?

Of the three locations, the school is closest to the channel, engineers said. A basin at the Circus Club could hold 5.6 million gallons of water, while the park could hold 3.9 million gallons and the school 1.1 million gallons, according to the NV5 report. Two basins would be needed "to really address" the flood potential, City Manager George Rodericks told the Almanac.

● The Las Lomitas Elementary School District is an independent agency. The town should keep track of district actions to address flooding at the school, including plans to divert water around the school and/or detain it.

● Water from the Horse Park at Woodside passes through the Atherton Channel. The town should get a reading on the water quality, including bacterial content, of storm water coming from the Horse Park.

Atherton's problem with runoff is complicated because of the multiple sources of the water. About half of it has sources west of town, with 36 percent coming from Menlo Park and unincorporated San Mateo County, and 19 percent from Woodside and Stanford University, according to NV5 engineers.

The Marsh Road bottleneck is a box-shaped culvert that can handle about 85 percent of what a 10-year storm would produce. Widening the culvert would be more problematic than building detention basins, Mr. Rodericks said, chiefly because the culvert is located in an area covered by multiple jurisdictions.

Complaints in town about flooding are markedly lower since the 2001 flooding analysis, with just 17 complaints in 2013 compared with 97 in 2001, the engineers said. The council's concern, for now, is a 10-year storm in that the Marsh Road culvert can handle flows for a seven-year storm only, engineers said.

Detention

Detention is key to reducing flow, and cooperation among the players is the best approach, said Nona Espinosa, a senior engineer at NV5.

Mr. Rodericks said the basins under discussion have two forms: a lawn over a concrete structure installed a few feet beneath the surface, making it all but invisible; or a field or lawn enclosed by berms, permeable and capable of holding maybe 4 feet of standing water. A key difference: an above-ground pond presents a drowning hazard and would have to be fenced.

The city had 48 drainage-system improvement projects on the table in 2001 and finished 26 of them to date, including 10 swales and six storm drain systems, at a cost of about $44 million, Councilwoman Elizabeth Lewis said. It's not clear what future infrastructure investment costs would be, town officials said.

Comment

Councilman Bill Widmer said he would not be 100 percent behind an above-ground detention pool at Holbrook-Palmer Park. "This is a park," he said. "It's not a water reservoir."

Such a basin becomes a safety issue, added Mayor Rick DeGolia.

The town should be talking about storm water with San Mateo County regarding the situation at the box culvert, and with officials from the Las Lomitas district and the Horse Park, Mr. DeGolia said.

Comments

6 people like this
Posted by whatever
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 4, 2015 at 1:14 pm

Editor
Speaking of the expected torrents of rain what's the condition of the San Francisquito Creek? Any word from the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority? What's the potential impact of the removal or changes to the Searsville Dam?

How does the vast amount of recent construction and covering of once uncovered soil impact runoff into the creek? (Stanford engineering & med center areas, cogeneration facility; SLAC; Rosewood Hotel; Ronald McDonald facility and Vi senior housing). Some of these may not be just a few years recent but recent as being built since the last huge storms and floods 1995 and 1998.

And don't forget 1955 with major portions of Menlo Park and Palo Alto flooded.


6 people like this
Posted by Water
a resident of another community
on Sep 4, 2015 at 2:04 pm

Water is a registered user.

Rural areas flood. Atherton prides itself on its rural environs. Good luck!


4 people like this
Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 4, 2015 at 5:30 pm

Who's responsible for debris removal from San Francisquito Creek? Much of the damage in our last big flood year came from spillover of trash-clogged creek bed.


2 people like this
Posted by Louise68
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 4, 2015 at 8:49 pm

I wish Atherton very well in dealing with the coming El Nino storms. We all need to do our best to prepare for potential flooding.

I was not around back in 1955 when parts of Menlo Park and Palo Alto flooded. Can anyone tell us exactly what areas flooded? A simple on-line map would be great. TIA!


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Babka bakery to open Thursday in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 4,924 views

Couples: Child Loss, "No U-Turn at Mercy Street"
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,646 views

Which Cocktail Has the Least Calories?
By Laura Stec | 12 comments | 1,436 views

UCSB's CCS program
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 3 comments | 626 views