News

County may spend $600K to defend suit over Skyline rehab center

 

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors recently authorized spending up to $600,000 to defend the county in a discrimination lawsuit brought in federal court by the owners of the Stillpath Retreat Center at 16350 Skyline Blvd. in the unincorporated woods above Woodside.

In a unanimous vote on Dec. 8, the board affirmed a resolution by the County Counsel's Office to extend the county's agreement for legal services with the San Francisco law firm Kerr & Wagstaffe, according to County Counsel John Beiers.

The issues are "unusually complex," and Kerr and Wagstaffe has experience in legal matters of this kind, as well as favorable rates and previous experience representing the county, the resolution said.

The suit stems from the board's unanimous decision in March 2014 to overturn a Planning Commission decision to allow the retreat center to reorganize as a non-medical drug-and-alcohol rehabilitation center for people with addiction problems.

After the Planning Commission acted in January 2014, neighbors of the facility appealed and the supervisors upheld their appeal, reversing the Planning Commission's decision. The neighbors' objections included the possibility of a recovering addict dropping a lit cigarette in the deep dry woods that characterize the neighborhood, concerns over the length of time it would take for first responders to get to an emergency, and the impacts of the facility on traffic and the supply of fresh water.

In the complaint, lawyers for Stillpath claim that the supervisors violated federal fair housing and disability laws protecting the rights of Stillpath's potential clients, including recovering alcoholics and substance abusers. The suit alleges that neighbors yielded to "prejudices and fears" and discriminated against Stillpath and its prospective occupants over "the presumed harm that persons with handicaps or disabilities would bring to their neighborhood."

"Stillpath seeks to prevent the County from interfering with and/or discriminating against this proposed use and the proposed occupants of the Treatment Facility," the complaint says, adding that a treatment facility is permitted under the existing conditional use permit.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by County Resident
a resident of another community
on Dec 30, 2015 at 7:47 pm

California's open meeting law known as The Brown Act requires that a complete and accurate copy of the documents that a local legislative body like the Board of Supervisors be posted along with the agenda of the meeting that action is to be taken act. The copy of the Stillpath Retreat Center contract between the County and the Kerr & Wagstaffe law firm posted on the Board of Supervisors meeting agenda website failed to include Exhibit A, which was identified as including the law firm's rates. See Consent Agenda Item No. 16. Consequently the action taken by the Board at the December 8 meeting is void.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Opening alert: Dumpling Garden in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 7,813 views

The Last Straw
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,708 views

Couples: Do you Really Agree or are you Afraid of not Agreeing?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 784 views

Trying to enjoy the routines again
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 332 views

 

The Almanac Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "The Almanac Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 28th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 18th issue of The Almanac.

VOTE HERE