News

FAA forms panel to give communities a voice on plane routes, altitudes

 

Spurred by outrage over airplane noise from residents of the Midpeninsula, the Federal Aviation Administration has agreed to the formation of a new committee aimed at giving critics a louder voice in future negotiations over plane routes and flight altitudes.

The FAA discussed the new committee at a March 7 meeting in Los Altos, which featured elected leaders from Santa Clara, San Mateo and Santa Cruz counties and members of the grassroots group Sky Posse, which has been leading the local effort to abate airplane noise.

The issue became urgent in the past year, as the FAA has implemented its Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) program in March 2015. The program concentrated flights along particular corridors, creating what some residents have described as "super highways" over their heads.

The creation of the new group, known as the FAA Select Committee, is the first substantive action that the FAA has agreed to undertake since November, when it agreed to take a fresh look at flight speeds, altitudes and waypoint locations as part of a new "three-phased initiative."

It remains to be seen whether the group will wield any actual influence over the federal agency.

The new committee will have 12 members, four from each of the three congressional districts in the area (the districts currently represented by Anna Eshoo, Sam Farr and Jackie Speier). Members will be picked by each congressional office.

Ian Gregor, the FAA's public affairs manager for the Pacific Division, said the new committee will focus mainly on issues beyond the scope of the SFO Roundtable, which will review and comment on areas at and near the airport.

Gregor said the SFO Roundtable will provide administrative support for the new group.

FAA officials indicated that the agency's feasibility study for potential changes to NextGen routes will be out in six weeks.

Many residents in attendance at the March 7 meeting voiced skepticism about the new committee. Some complained about the FAA's failure to notify anyone in advance about the committee's creation or to seek input.

Jennifer Landesmann, a Sky Posse member who attended the meeting in Los Altos, said that criticism from communities about NextGen have put pressure on the federal administration to improve its community-outreach practices.

"The FAA has failed miserably with the implementation of NextGen," Landesmann said. "They are on the hot seat for failing to deal with the communities in an appropriate way. The Bay Area is supposedly going to be an example on how to deal with communities. If they fail us, they will once again be on the hot seat."

Other residents offered personal anecdotes about loud flights soaring over their homes at all hours of the day and night. A resident of Crescent Park in Palo Alto said that just that morning, when she was out her garden, loud planes were passing over head every two to three minutes. Another spoke of the midnight and 1:30 a.m. flights that pass over her house. A third complained about a "real degradation of the quality of life because of the noise."

Resident Mark Shull said the main problem that residents have with NextGen is that planes "fly over the same houses every single time."

"That is new as of March last year," Shull said. "And it's not just one route, which cities around the country are complaining about, it is three converging in one place. And there's almost no place in the country that has as much convergence as we do."

Comments

3 people like this
Posted by woodside resident
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Glens
on Mar 9, 2016 at 12:41 pm

Since November, we hear the constant sound of planes overhead, day and night. It is a constant annoyance and completely disrupted our private life. I track the flight paths with an iPhone add, and it is clear that nearly all southbound traffic departing SFO flies out over the ocean and then TURNS BACK and flies right over the most densely populated areas of the peninsula. Inbound traffic from the north similarly is directed over the peninsula and then backtracks north to land in SFO. Why? The changes were apparently made to simplify the flight paths, and to attempt to reduce fuel consumption... clearly this was done without any consideration for noise above populated areas. I think the FAA needs to revisit this and recall that quality of life should be a consideration, not just in our community but in all metropolitan areas these changes have been implemented. I look forward to following up with all channels available to get this issue addressed.


2 people like this
Posted by noise issue follower
a resident of another community
on Mar 11, 2016 at 7:01 am

Everyone who attended any of the public workshops was shown numerous charts depicting flight tracks prior to the new flight routes and flight tracks of the proposed flight tracks. The inbound and outbound traffic paths for SFO and SJC are almost identical with new and old tracks except we attendees were warned at the workshops that satellite navigation is more precise and therefore flights would likely be more concentrated in some areas. Those of us who have paid attention for many years know that aircraft noise has been an issue on the peninsula for at least 35 years. The focus on it is new, but the noise is not. My only hope is that the "Select Committee" is made up of a true representation of the affected communities - otherwise the committee will work to move the planes off their own houses onto the homes of those not represented. That would be unfair. Are the members selected based on the amount of money they contribute to political campaigns? Are they selected because they are the squeakiest wheels? Are they selected because they know anything about aviation? Are they selected merely because they know someone who knows someone? These are the questions we should be asking...


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Babka bakery to open Thursday in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 4,750 views

Couples: Child Loss, "No U-Turn at Mercy Street"
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,629 views

Which Cocktail Has the Least Calories?
By Laura Stec | 12 comments | 1,423 views

UCSB's CCS program
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 608 views