News


Woodside may restrict ASRB members' participation in other advisory panels

 

On a 4-3 vote, the Woodside Town Council on March 8 approved drafting a resolution that would restrict members of the town's Architectural and Site Review Board from discussing and voting on certain projects as a member of another major advisory committee.

The resolution would not change the existing situation that allows a review board member to sit on any of the other 13 committees that advise the council. But if an ASRB member expects to be voting on a project, that member could not vote on the same project as a member of another major advisory committee.

The questions before the council were whether such a situation represented a conflict of interest, and if so, whether it should be addressed with restrictions.

In the vote, council members Peter Mason, Chris Shaw and Dave Tanner dissented. Asked to explain his dissent, Mr. Mason replied in an email: "This is not a conflict of interest that requires recusal," he said. "It is a conflict of a perceived opinion basis or bias. This will occur regardless of how many other committees a person is on or not on."

— Dave Boyce

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Couple brings Chinese zongzi to Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 5,741 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 6 comments | 1,312 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 1,184 views

"Better" Dads and "Re-invigorated" Moms: Happier Couples
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,040 views

Bobby in Naziland: A Tale of Flatbush
By Stuart Soffer | 2 comments | 475 views

 

Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More