News


Woodside may restrict ASRB members' participation in other advisory panels

 

On a 4-3 vote, the Woodside Town Council on March 8 approved drafting a resolution that would restrict members of the town's Architectural and Site Review Board from discussing and voting on certain projects as a member of another major advisory committee.

The resolution would not change the existing situation that allows a review board member to sit on any of the other 13 committees that advise the council. But if an ASRB member expects to be voting on a project, that member could not vote on the same project as a member of another major advisory committee.

The questions before the council were whether such a situation represented a conflict of interest, and if so, whether it should be addressed with restrictions.

In the vote, council members Peter Mason, Chris Shaw and Dave Tanner dissented. Asked to explain his dissent, Mr. Mason replied in an email: "This is not a conflict of interest that requires recusal," he said. "It is a conflict of a perceived opinion basis or bias. This will occur regardless of how many other committees a person is on or not on."

Dave Boyce

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.

Comments

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Beer and brats: Ludwig's German Table coming to Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,395 views

Who Pays for Palo Alto Schools
By Steve Levy | 38 comments | 1,857 views

The Other Greenhouse Gas
By Sherry Listgarten | 8 comments | 1,760 views

Meet the Nurdles
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 1,190 views

College Tours
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 987 views