News


Grass fire burns 13 acres in eastern Menlo Park

Flames reached 20 feet at one point, chief says

By Dave Boyce and Kate Bradshaw | Almanac Staff Writers

A grass fire that started around 3:50 p.m. Monday at an open swampy area in eastern Menlo Park near Bayfront Expressway and University Avenue burned 13 acres and engaged firefighters from five firefighting agencies for several hours before the fire was extinguished shortly after 7 p.m., fire officials said.

Eight fire engines were on the scene from the Menlo Park Fire Protection District and neighboring fire departments, including Redwood City's and Palo Alto's.

The location, a wildlife area with tall brush and spongy, soggy ground, is privately held by the Kavanaugh family. Called the Kavanaugh Tract, it is located at University Avenue and Bayfront Expressway, near the western end of the Dumbarton Bridge and within sight of Facebook's headquarters.

The flames reached 20 feet at one point. "It was pretty dramatic for a period of time," Chief Schapelhouman said. "It must have been a pretty good show for (Facebook) employees to watch."

Firefighters first reported the fire at 3:50 p.m. when it had engaged about a quarter-acre and was being driven by heavy winds. Firefighters on the scene asked dispatchers to call in a second alarm at about 4 p.m.

"We got a pretty good grass fire," a firefighter reported at 4:10. "It's reaching University with (its) four lanes. We're hoping that is a (fire) break. ... A lot of smoke. ... Hard to identify anything at this point."

The wind, at 20 mph to 25 mph, played a big role, the chief said: "It's blowing out here."

Firefighters had knocked down the fire that was near power lines. They were worried about the fire moving toward the power lines, where they couldn't get on the ground to fight it. "It's rough going to get out there," Chief Schapelhouman said in reference to the swampy ground the firefighters were working in.

The stronger than average winds on Monday also carried the embers uncomfortably close to the East Palo Alto homes across University Avenue, and the firefighters blocked off some of those streets for safety, issuing a shelter in place order for residents in the area.

The fire never endangered any structures and did not jump across any roads, but there were homeless encampments in the wildlife preserve.

The untended grass and bushes are between four feet and six feet high, high enough to hide a homeless encampment, Chief Schapelhouman said. The property owners used to mow down the area, he said, but can do so no longer due to environmental concerns.

Though there's no conclusive evidence yet of how the fire started, Chief Schapelhouman said the fire did originate near a homeless encampment at the site. Homeless people were seen running from the area, and police are interviewing them.

They are "a strong suspect" in the analysis of the cause of the fire, the chief said. At the time of the fire, there were at least three homeless encampments on the property. It is also one of several fires within the last month that has originated near a homeless encampment.

During the fire, University Avenue was shut down in both directions and authorities were asking drivers to avoid the area near the intersection with Bayfront Expressway.

There was someone known to the district with a drone on scene and shooting aerial video of the fire, the chief said. The video will be posted on the fire district's website, he said.

The fire's quick growth and strength seemed to be a surprise to some firefighters. Since most of the nearby grasses are green and the ground is fairly moist – it was raining slightly during the fire – it's considered a fire risk "off-season."

"In California, it's always fire season," said Division Chief Jim Stevens of the Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

The nearest helicopter for a water drop was stationed in Napa, since the helicopter normally assigned to the area and with the capability to drop water is in maintenance and out of service, Chief Schapelhouman said.

Comments

4 people like this
Posted by The Redditarian
a resident of another community
on Mar 28, 2016 at 8:40 pm

[Post removed; Town Square is not a forum for disrespectful and cruel commentary.]


8 people like this
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of another community
on Mar 28, 2016 at 9:09 pm

By all means, the delicate sensibilities of Facebook employees must not be compromised! (Never mind that those homeless folks probably lived in some of the housing either taken over by those very employees or are homeless due to insane rents caused in part by Facebook's relocation to Menlo.) Let's not be concerned about the loss of wildlife or marsh, or the problems experienced by commuters or residents.


Like this comment
Posted by The Redditarian
a resident of another community
on Mar 28, 2016 at 9:56 pm

What about the Facebook commuters? The Facebook residents? It inconvenienced them too right? And just because they work at facebook you think that they don't love the frogs and cranes and @#$! that lived in that swamp just as much as you or I? My friend says that her car smells like burnt garbage now.


Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of another community
on Mar 28, 2016 at 10:06 pm

Oh no, burnt garbage! Her poor car. What a tragedy.


16 people like this
Posted by Robert D.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 29, 2016 at 7:43 am

Robert D. is a registered user.

This article was about the fire - right? I will never understand all the hate towards fb and its employees. I have never worked there and do not know anyone there. I do know they have been a good neighbor, helped our community and the greater bay area. Their buildings create some of the lowest carbon footprint per sq. foot anywhere. and their CEO and his wife are giving away all their money to charity.
I would understand logical opposition in a constructive forum, I just don't get hate.


3 people like this
Posted by really?
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 29, 2016 at 8:57 am

'Wildlife Habitat'- if that scruffy wasteland qualifies as habitat, I'm a spotted owl.


3 people like this
Posted by Request for better reporting
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 29, 2016 at 12:32 pm

Interesting item in the article that could use some more detail:

"The property owners used to mow down the area, he said, but can do so no longer due to environmental concerns."

What are the environmental concerns? Why would you report this without supporting information?


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: Engaged on Valentine’s Day! Topics to Discuss
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 5,808 views

Sharing A Column About a Brilliant Teacher Idea
By Steve Levy | 5 comments | 1,166 views

Family Matters: Caring for the Dying, and Their Loved Ones
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 623 views

A fast approaching birthday
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 503 views

Henry and Fluffy, On Duty
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 146 views