Open enrollment begins for clean energy program


Residents can now sign up to participate in the October launch of the Peninsula Clean Energy program, a greener alternative to Pacific Gas & Electric Corp. as a source of electrical power.

By signing up independently, voluntary participants join the 20 percent of PG&E residential customers and all small- and medium-sized businesses in San Mateo County who will be automatically switched to the program in October.

Go to and click on the green rectangle that says, "Enroll me now!" Or call (866) 966-0110. You will need to know your PG&E account number, which is located in the upper right corner of your PG&E bill.

The remaining 80 percent of residents not enrolled for the October roll out will be automatically enrolled by April 2017, program spokesman David Burruto said.

Those who want to voluntarily enroll are urged to do so by Sept. 5. Those automatically enrolled will be informed of the change and of their right to opt out.

The default residential rate is expected to be lower than the PG&E rate. The default mix of energy will be 75 percent from sources that do not create greenhouse gasses, Mr. Burruto said.

For a typical monthly premium of about $5, customers can opt for electricity from 100 percent renewable sources.

Some 18 months in the making, the program is a collective -- commonly referred to as a joint powers authority -- that includes San Mateo County, the unincorporated communities and all 20 incorporated cities and towns, all of which are represented on the authority's board of directors.

Local representatives include council members Catherine Carlton for Menlo Park, Rick DeGolia for Atherton, Jeff Aalfs for Portola Valley and Daniel Yost for Woodside. Supervisors Dave Pine and Carole Groom represent the county.

Mr. Pine is also the chair and Mr. Aalfs the vice chair of an executive committee that, with CEO Jan Pepper, oversees the operation of the agency.

The authority chose the initial 20 percent residential enrollment so that all ZIP codes in the county were represented, Mr. Burruto said.

Not included in that 20 percent are residents of Portola Valley. The Town Council there decided in May to start its constituents off with the greenest option, which is pushing back the town's automatic enrollment to April 2017 to allow the authority time to procure the necessary power, said Brandi de Garmeaux, who manages the town's sustainability programs.

In Menlo Park, some households in Belle Haven, Sharon Heights, and some streets in western Menlo Park, among others, are slated to be in the first round of enrollment, according to program coordinator Carolyn Raider.

Reducing emissions

As the program gets underway, customers will have several opportunities to opt out of the default and go with another option. Returning to PG&E will always be an option -- at no cost if it's done within the first 60 days of service, or later for a one-time fee of $5 (for residents).

The authority purchases energy on the open market, but from sources that are renewable -- not derived from fossil fuels such as oil, natural gas and coal.

The authority's primary goal is reducing greenhouse gas emissions on the Peninsula and participating in efforts to slow climate change induced by human activity that, by burning fossil fuels, adds to the accumulation of such heat-trapping gases in the Earth's atmosphere.

If Peninsula Clean Energy is profitable, the earnings will be reinvested locally in new energy efficiency projects and programs, perhaps leading to new local green jobs, the agency says.

If the authority is not profitable, its purchase of a $100,000 bond, as required by law, will allow a smooth transition of customers back to PG&E, Mr. Burruto said.

Kate Bradshaw contributed to this report.


Follow the Almanac on Twitter and Facebook for breaking news, local events and community news.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Caroline V.
a resident of Portola Valley: other
on Sep 9, 2016 at 4:41 pm

Caroline V. is a registered user.

Thank you Dave Boyce and the Almanac for the insightful article on Peninsula Clean Energy.

Let me start by saying that I hope Peninsula Clean Energy will have a successful outcome. I strongly feel our efforts to produce cleaner energy are imperative and we have no time to procrastinate; however, based on prior failed government initiatives like Solyndra, Web Link
I would like to post the following comments with the hope others will participate in the discussion and provide me with some answers.

My husband and I are all for cleaner energy and that is why we purchased American made Solar panels in 2012. They did not come for free. We financed them through a lease agreement with Cobalt Power. We are still undecided and continue to educate ourselves before enrolling with Peninsula Clean Energy. Some information has not been made available e. g what are these "cleaner " energy resources ? Where do these resources come from ? Who will oversee PCEA ? How do we know the energy they provide is cleaner?

I also have concerns after learning what PACE (Property assess clean energy) is.
According to a government website: PACE is an “innovative mechanism for financing energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements on private property. PACE programs allow local governments, state governments, or other inter-jurisdictional authorities, when authorized by state law, to fund the up-front cost of energy improvements on commercial and residential properties, which are paid back over time by the property owners”…read more:
Web Link

I get weekly sales calls advertising that our household might qualify for one of the 18 new government programs to promote clean energy. These government paid solicitors advertise free solar panels as their only source of clean energy. I wonder how many tax payer dollars are used to finance these programs.

Mr. Burruto stated that Peninsula Clean Energy (PCEA) purchased a $100,000 bond in case the authority is not profitable. I hope PCEA will be profitable because, how will this bond protect us, the Tax payers, when PCEA received a 2 million (or is 2.7 million?) advance from San Mateo County, signed a 12 million loan with Barclays, and received a $ 6 million loan as collateral for the $12 million dollar bank loan authorized by the County Board of Supervisors (BOS). More information can be found on the PCEA website.
For example this publication for the June 9 meeting: Web Link

Time constraints does not allow me to attend their board meetings, so I hope someone will answer my questions through this forum.
Thank you,

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Legends Pizza Co. replaces Palo Alto Pizza Co.
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 2,256 views

Premarital and Couples: 10 Tips for the Holidays
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,105 views

What is a "ton" of carbon dioxide anyway?
By Sherry Listgarten | 13 comments | 2,032 views

By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 841 views


The holidays are here!

From live music to a visit with Santa, here's a look at some local holiday activities to help you get into the spirit of the season.