News

San Mateo County enhances protection for 'significant' trees

Menlo Oaks residents sought to protect tree canopy

San Mateo County has beefed up its tree protection regulations after residents of Menlo Oaks, in unincorporated Menlo Park, complained that their namesake oak trees were falling prey to development at an alarming rate.

The new rules went into effect Nov. 17 after being approved unanimously by the Board of Supervisors in September and October.

Steve Monowitz, the county's community development director, said the new rules will "increase protection of heritage trees and significant trees" in unincorporated areas of the county.

He said the county is actually working on a complete overhaul of its tree regulations, first adopted in 1977, but Menlo Oaks residents had asked for something to be done quickly to stop trees from disappearing from their neighborhood before its character was destroyed.

The rules affect all trees defined by the county as significant or larger, which in most zones is anything 38-inches-or-more in circumference at 4.5 feet above ground.

Any development that could affect trees of "significant" size or larger may be required to have a tree-protection plan. Tree protection zones must be established and maintained throughout construction. Any activity that requires tree roots to be cut requires the presence of an arborist.

No construction will be allowed without the tree protection plan in place.

Fines for illegally taking out trees have been increased to $2,500 for the first significant tree and $5,000 for the first heritage tree. (Heritage tree sizes vary by tree species, but a valley oak that measures more than 48 inches around at 4.5 feet above the ground qualifies, as does a redwood of more than 72 inches around at that height east of Skyline Boulevard or 84 inches around west of Skyline.)

Fines rise to $7,500 for illegally removing a second heritage tree and $10,000 for each additional heritage tree. Fines for illegal significant tree removal are half the amount of heritage tree fines.

When the supervisors discussed the proposed law in September, Supervisor Carol Groom said she'd like the fines to be even larger. "This is a good start," she said.

The county will hire its own arborist, to be shared between the parks and planning departments, County Manager John Maltbie said.

Most of the residents at the meeting cheered the changes.

"Thank you so much," said Menlo Oaks resident Janet Weisman Goff. "We feel a glimmer of hope that maybe we will retain our tree canopy in Menlo Oaks."

But new resident Suzanne O'Brien said she saw the rules as "government intervention in private property" that "seem to run the risk of putting undue burden on homeowners who are merely trying to protect the health of the tree."

Supervisor Don Horsley said there are multiple reasons to defend trees. "We're not doing this to protect the trees because it makes a few people happy," he said. Trees fight greenhouse gases, he noted. He asked the planning department to work with the Sheriff's Office to respond to complaints of illegal tree work when planners aren't working.

At the county website (Item 38) you can download the new regulations and staff report.

Comments

9 people like this
Posted by whatever
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Nov 30, 2016 at 9:48 am

These fines are a pittance to developers who will be selling new homes in MP for $2 million to $6 million.


7 people like this
Posted by Beth
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Nov 30, 2016 at 2:04 pm

Nice to see rapid response to community concern, especially for environment.

But why or why can't our government make a statement that forcefully states its position and policy, including fines that discourage or outright eliminate the flouting of regulations?

And publicly post names and addresses of developers that disregard it?

Who wins by not doing this, besides the developers?



3 people like this
Posted by Allen
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Nov 30, 2016 at 2:08 pm

Nevertheless this is very good news and shows that someone cares.


2 people like this
Posted by Janet Weisman Goff
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Nov 30, 2016 at 3:10 pm

I'm only one of the Menlo Oaks Tree Adovocacy volunteers who have been working tirelessly for two years to partner with the County and get these important protections in place. MOTA is strongly in favor of keeping neighborhoods vibrant and progressive as long as new development is environmentally responsible. Old growth trees were here long before us and provide a range of lasting health benefits and quality of life. Thanks to the SMC Board of Supervisors, and to Barbara Wood and The Almanac for informing the community. Menlo Oaks Tree Advocacy can be contacted at menlooaks-mota.org.


2 people like this
Posted by Andrew McLish
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Nov 30, 2016 at 4:46 pm

Thank you Supervisors. The tree protection plan is important. Too often trees are damaged by construction and appear fine when the construction is complete, only to die one or two years later from the construction damage. Hopefully with County arborist involvement this will happen less often .


1 person likes this
Posted by Judy Horst
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Dec 1, 2016 at 10:11 am

Very pleased that the County Supervisors, County Planning & Building Department listened to our suggestions over the past 2 1/2 years. It started with one Heritage Oak we hoped to save from removal (though it was just cut down by its new home owner). This led to stopping a mismanaged subdivision project which destroyed several Heritage Oaks without permit. Finally, we worked with the County to obtain these changes. Even more changes are to come -- all benefiting our old growth Heritage Oaks and other Significant Trees not just here but throughout the County. Menlo Oaks Tree Advocates (MOTA) still has lots of work to do, but I'm so glad to be part of something good that happened, thanks to the efforts of many concerned citizens.


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Apr 10, 2017 at 12:37 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Greek restaurant Taverna opening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 10,290 views

Retail's Real Estate Glut is Growing
By Steve Levy | 8 comments | 1,677 views

Couples: . . . “Joy is greater than sorrow,“ . . . “Nay, sorrow is the greater.”
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,106 views

Munchie Movement
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 676 views

 

The Almanac Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "The Almanac Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 28th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 18th issue of The Almanac.

VOTE HERE