There's a lot more than a fire services fiscal review (see related story) on the agenda of the Atherton City Council when it meets on Wednesday, Jan. 17. The agenda also includes Caltrain poles, civic center trees, false alarms, a business tax and safety improvements for the El Camino Real/Selby Lane intersection.
The meeting starts at 7 p.m. in the town's council chambers, 94 Ashfield Road.
Among the items on the agenda are:
● A report on the number of false alarms the Atherton Police Department responds to each year. Chief Steve McCulley has recommended that residents start paying an annual alarm registration fee and a $200 fine for all false alarms beyond the first each year.
The chief's report says that from January 2016 to November 2017 the police department received 4,599 alarm calls --all of them false. The department was able to determine that about half the calls were false alarms without responding. But ones they did respond to took up the equivalent of 13 months of one full-time police officer doing nothing but responding to false alarms, at an approximate cost of over $136,000, the chief's report says.
● More discussion of Caltrain's electrification poles. The town sent a letter in December asking Caltrain to change its plans for some of the poles that will soon be placed to support the electric wires needed to run electric locomotives. But Caltrain responded that the town's request will mean removing a tree on private property and reducing the landscape buffer of three other homes at a cost of at least $200,000.
Caltrain asked the town to use that information to reconsider its request that five planned 45.5-foot poles be replaced with 10 36-foot poles. The council will also consider if it wants green, brown, yellow or galvanized poles in the train station area. All other poles will be green.
● Discussion of, and recommendations on, alternatives for the El Camino Real/Selby Lane intersection. Since mid-2015 the town, San Mateo County and Caltrans have discussed alternatives for the intersection, which has a high accident rate that has risen further since discussions began. While the town currently has no funding for a project at the intersection, it has narrowed the choices for the project down to eliminating all turns at the intersection except for left turns from northbound El Camino onto Selby, or installing a traffic signal.
● A decision on saving several heritage trees now scheduled to be cut down as part of the civic center project. In October, the town's Planning Commission approved a permit to remove 18 of the 85 heritage trees on the civic center site. But City Council member balked, and have tried to figure out how to save more trees. Five trees must go because arborists agree they are unhealthy, and the town has figured out how to work around eight other trees. Saving the remaining trees could add considerable costs to the project and might also delay it, so the council must decide if those trade-offs are worthwhile.
The town will also receive an update from its consultant about the current cost estimates for the civic center project, which is still on schedule to go out to bid in March.
● Consideration of hiring election and polling consultants to help design a business license tax measure that would go on the ballot in November. The council has approved the concept of increasing the town's business license tax, but such an increase must be approved by just over 50 percent of voters.
Comments
Atherton: West Atherton
on Jan 16, 2018 at 10:32 am
on Jan 16, 2018 at 10:32 am
"It's worth it to be paying 75% of the Town's total budget to the police department. Look at all they do for the residents. Free alarm monitoring! If you don't support this, you've go ta big problem!".
Next step: parcel tax fails.
Now: "Chief Steve McCulley has recommended that residents start paying an annual alarm registration fee."
Time to OUTSOURCE these jokers.
another community
on Jan 16, 2018 at 10:58 am
on Jan 16, 2018 at 10:58 am
"Chief Steve McCulley has recommended that residents start paying an annual alarm registration fee and a $200 fine for all false alarms beyond the first each year. "
The fine is...er...fine. I get that there's a non-zero cost to false alarms.
An alarm registration fee is a non-starter. I refuse to pay for the right to secure my own home!!!! What next, a fee for locking my front door?
I'm pro-Atherton PD, but proposals like this will kill off the PD and make it easy to make the case for contracting out to the sheriff.
Registered user
Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 16, 2018 at 11:54 am
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2018 at 11:54 am
Since the Town actually monitors my alarm I would have NO problem paying afee for that service.
Why should some Atherton residents get a free service that in most other communities is either not available or is charged for?
Registered user
Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 16, 2018 at 1:32 pm
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2018 at 1:32 pm
The logic the town has had in the past is that monitoring all alarms at no charge to the homeowner allows quick response to a break in rather than have an outside alarm company monitor the alarm. There has been a charge to the homeowner for multiple false alarms. That seems fair.
Charging for alarm monitoring increases response time when outside alarm companies have to report.
The town can well afford to offer this to its residents.
Registered user
Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 16, 2018 at 1:42 pm
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2018 at 1:42 pm
How can you tell when a politicians is lying? Their lips are moving.
Any tax the town tries implement goes against their promise last June to not increase or add any new taxes. The logic that this tax will not be paid by the residents, but instead, by the businesses is short sighted. The cost of all expenses doing business is always passed on the the customers, the residents. We will be paying any increase in business taxes. You can count on it.
This tax will definitely be opposed if placed on the ballot but the real estate industry and the residents who opposed the parcel tax.
Atherton: West Atherton
on Jan 16, 2018 at 1:43 pm
on Jan 16, 2018 at 1:43 pm
"Why should some Atherton residents get a free service that in most other communities is either not available or is charged for?"
Because we've been repeatedly told our property tax (and prior parcel taxes) that are very high support a very expensive police department, but we are getting the value in service from that.
It's definitely not "free".
Registered user
Menlo Park: other
on Jan 16, 2018 at 5:25 pm
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2018 at 5:25 pm
The "added service" APD provides could easily be provided by a private guard service. The town should outsource the police work to the Sheriff. The private security company could monitor alarms, take in newspapers, keep homeowners keys, water their lawns and whatever other NON-POLICE duties APD handles. Having a police department for that stuff is a ridiculous waste of money.
The Sheriff can provide equal levels of POLICE services for half the cost. A security company could handle the rest for significantly less than half the cost of what APD costs. Won't need a new gym for the PD then either.
Atherton: other
on Jan 17, 2018 at 9:35 am
on Jan 17, 2018 at 9:35 am
Menlo Voter.
Your proposed solution makes way too much sense and logic. This is politics, remember.
Registered user
Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
on Jan 17, 2018 at 4:56 pm
Registered user
on Jan 17, 2018 at 4:56 pm
If the cost of responding to about 5,000 alarms is $135,000, why is the proposal not simply a fee of $27/alarm which roughly offsets the cost? Doe the PD need to mark it up over 700% for some reason? Sounds like a good business. Are they planning an IPO soon?
Registered user
Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 17, 2018 at 6:46 pm
Registered user
on Jan 17, 2018 at 6:46 pm
I pay $48/month for alarm monitoring for our home in El Dorado County - why should my alarm monitoring in Atherton be free?
Atherton: West Atherton
on Jan 17, 2018 at 7:59 pm
on Jan 17, 2018 at 7:59 pm
@awatkins – They need the extra money to funnel to the town center and to make up for the parcel tax.
@Peter – because the PD promised this in return for not considering outsourcing.
Atherton: other
on Jan 17, 2018 at 11:20 pm
on Jan 17, 2018 at 11:20 pm
Please go ahead and charge something for monitoring; it clearly should not be a free service. For once, I agree with Mr. Carpenter.