Menlo Park: Council to consider bringing 'charter' option to voters in November


Tonight, the Menlo Park City Council is scheduled to discuss the possibility of putting an "enabling" charter measure on the November 2018 ballot.

According to a staff report, if voters approve the switch from a "general law" city to a charter city, Menlo Park would gain flexibility in how it handles affairs in the areas of construction and maintenance contracting, land use, city finances, government structure and elections.

"In a nutshell, the benefit of becoming a charter city is the ability to have more control over local government autonomy," wrote City Attorney Bill McClure in the staff report.

One drawback is that there are some ongoing questions with the courts as to just what cities can legislate for themselves. Charter cities aren't supposed to legislate on matters that are considered of "statewide concern" – and courts' definitions of what exactly that means has shifted over time, according to Mr. McClure's report. Housing policy, for instance, was once considered a local affair, but more recent court decisions indicate that it is a statewide concern, according to the staff report.

To see more specific details of how a general law city differs from a charter city and what the impacts might be for Menlo Park, see pages 5-12 of the report.

The council is also scheduled to:

● Possibly approve a final list of its priorities for the 2018 calendar year. Learn more from the Almanac's previous coverage here.

● Hold a study session on how to set up a transportation management association.

● Without discussion, dedicate an additional $160,000 from the general fund to eliminate herbicide use in some city parks and continue to maintain those that are already herbicide-free.

Following a closed session starting at 6:30 p.m., the council is scheduled to start its regular session at 7 p.m. Watch the meeting online here and access the agenda here.

The council meets in the City Council chambers at 701 Laurel St. in the Menlo Park Civic Center.

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.


5 people like this
Posted by margomca
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Feb 6, 2018 at 12:55 pm

margomca is a registered user.

As much as I hate to say it, I'm not sure I trust our council and planning commission with any more decision-making power than they already have. I don't think the current large buildings along el Camino are a great idea. I think the focus should be on more housing, especially near the train station. Having more offices may generate more revenue but it will make more traffic too. I believe most people who would choose to live next to that track, putting up with the noise would do so because they would be train commuters. Why else would anyone want to be between the noise of el Camino and the intrusion of the trains??? On the other hand, I do believe voters should have their say, even if I fear the outcome. So what am I saying. Yes, we should be allowed to vote and I would urge a NO vote.

Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights

on Feb 10, 2018 at 2:57 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Beer and brats: Ludwig's German Table coming to Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,027 views

The Other Greenhouse Gas
By Sherry Listgarten | 8 comments | 1,655 views

Who Pays for Palo Alto Schools
By Steve Levy | 24 comments | 1,452 views

Couples: Mirror, Mirror on the . . . Fight?!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,341 views

Meet the Nurdles
By Laura Stec | 6 comments | 1,114 views