Menlo Park: Parents seek city funds to cover future imbalance

Stanford housing development won't generate property taxes to cover bump in school enrollment

A rendering of some of the apartments planned for construction at 500 El Camino Real by Stanford, which would be intended for university faculty and staff. (Image courtesy Stanford University/city of Menlo Park.)

When the Menlo Park City Council approved a proposal by Stanford last

October to add 215 apartments, 143,000 square feet of office space and about 10,000 square feet of retail space at 500 El Camino Real, one piece of the negotiations went unresolved. In February, Menlo Park Vice Mayor Ray Mueller proposed one option to correct a shortfall the Menlo Park City School District may experience as a result of the development, and the concept is gaining traction among district parents.

The problem

The core of the problem is that under California law, Stanford University is exempt from having to pay property taxes on any building it uses for "academic purposes." That includes faculty and staff housing, which the apartments planned at 500 El Camino Real are intended to be used for.

Yet 60 percent of the school district's funding comes from property taxes, according to district spokeswoman Parke Treadway. And, presumably, some of the faculty and staff who will be housed at Stanford's new complex will have children. So the district would have to cover the costs to educate those kids without receiving property taxes from those households, an added cost the district claims would total about $663,000 per year.

Stanford officials have said that the university will pay property taxes on the office buildings that are slated to be developed as part of the project and leased to commercial tenants.

To address this, the city of Menlo Park had negotiated with Stanford University to get a contribution of $1.5 million to go toward an endowment for the Menlo Park-Atherton Education Foundation, an independent fundraising arm that provides funding for the Menlo Park City School District.

In previous negotiations between the city and Stanford, the university had offered $1.5 million to the Menlo Park City School District via the education foundation. The district says it needs a contribution of $2.5 million to its endowment (plus substantial property taxes from the office buildings) to enable it to annually generate enough revenue to cover that expected shortfall.

Stanford added a stipulation that up to $1 million of a $5 million Stanford contribution to a proposed bicycle and pedestrian crossing over or under the Caltrain tracks at Middle Avenue could potentially be paid to the education foundation instead. The idea was that the university would pay half of the cost for the crossing – up to $5 million – and if the city were to find a way to cut costs on that project, then up to $1 million of the project money left over would go to the education foundation.

The proposed solution

In February, the council received its mid-year budget report, which indicated that the city has a surplus of $3.85 million, $1.16 million of which was unbudgeted returns from what's called "ERAF," or the "Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund."

That fund represents city money that's set aside each year to cover any shortfalls school districts might have if property taxes don't reach a basic funding level. That money is returned to cities annually if high property tax districts (like the Menlo Park City School District) cross that funding threshold.

At the Feb. 13 meeting, Mr. Mueller suggested that the city put $1.5 million of that surplus toward the project – he later indicated he wanted that number to be $1 million – enough to cover the funding gap between what Stanford has committed and the $2.5 million the district says it would need.

"We have an opportunity here now to kill that bird with this stone," Mr. Mueller told the council at the time.

According to Ms. Treadway, district Superintendent Erik Burmeister alerted a small group of parents about the idea, and since then an email campaign to the council has been launched. As of the morning of Monday, March 5, the council had received about 21 emails urging it to put the surplus toward covering the expected shortfall from Stanford.

"The development is expected to generate approximately 39 new students beginning in the 2019-20 school year. As a community funded district, MPCSD does not receive any more funding when more students enroll," Menlo Park parent Max Bonnette wrote in an email. "We all appreciate the value that an excellent school district adds to our vibrant community, and with your foresight and help, we can maintain the quality that we all expect."

To do so straightforwardly, however, would probably be considered an illegal gift of public funds from one government agency to another, Mr. Mueller cautioned.

What the city may be able to do, he noted, is put $1 million from its surplus toward the proposed bike and pedestrian Caltrain crossing at Middle Avenue, and then urge Stanford to transfer $1 million that it planned to put toward that project to the school district through the Menlo Park-Atherton Education Foundation.

Mayor Peter Ohtaki agreed to add the matter to a future council agenda.


Sign up for Almanac Express to get news updates. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.


18 people like this
Posted by whatever
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 5, 2018 at 3:18 pm

Time to change the state law and make it retroactive. Overly wealthy "non-profits" do not need tax exemptions. The robber baron lives on.

3 people like this
Posted by Statues Crumble
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 6, 2018 at 8:39 pm

Every time Ray Mueller faces a choice between:

A. Pose a question to the rest of the council, build consensus, acknowledge hard choices and tradeoffs, reach a "good but not perfect" solution, and share credit
B. Throw out the "solution", position self as savior, talk to reporters, stand in front of cameras, and annoy more self-effacing public servants who do work behind the scenes

He will ALWAYS choose B. Stop getting played, Almanac!

Also, why not mention that the 2017 Council approval of the Stanford project was unanimous, including Ray's vote to approve? I don't give anyone extra credit for solving a problem that they helped create.

8 people like this
Posted by Inside baseball
a resident of Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Mar 6, 2018 at 8:48 pm

Word in the school district is Mueller made the suggestion in a City Council meeting on the budget, and that actually the school district spread the word to parents about the suggestion, not Mueller. In fact the District's Measure X campaign alerted parents, not Mueller. The emails they sent in to the Council caused the reporter to write the story, not Mueller. Word is then a certain Councilmember started complaining. Looking at those facts, all Mueller did was make a suggestion in the Council meeting and now apparently get attacked for it.

9 people like this
Posted by Inside Baseball
a resident of Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Mar 6, 2018 at 8:56 pm

The article says Mueller made the suggestion to the Council at a Council meeting:

"At the Feb. 13 meeting, Mr. Mueller suggested that the city put $1.5 million of that surplus toward the project – he later indicated he wanted that number to be $1 million – enough to cover the funding gap between what Stanford has committed and the $2.5 million the district says it would need.

"We have an opportunity here now to kill that bird with this stone," Mr. Mueller told the council at the time."

The article sets out exactly what happened, despite the sideswipe by "statues crumble." Apparently so do fragile egos.

8 people like this
Posted by Parent
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Mar 7, 2018 at 2:03 am

After reading the article the attack on Councilmember Mueller in the comments seems petty.

7 people like this
Posted by Stranger Things
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Mar 7, 2018 at 8:03 am

It's that time of year again. With the City Council's district election vote just weeks aways, the political season officially has begun in Menlo Park again. Look forward to attacks and smears with anonymous posts on the Almanac Town Square by angry pseudonyms, thinly veiled, hoping to furthering their political ambition by insulting others.

The attack here is preposterous.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Mountain View wine bar Le Plonc opens
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,420 views

Data and Compassion: Radical Tools in the Fight for Gun Control
By Aldis Petriceks | 8 comments | 1,083 views

How to make a new family's stay more comfortable
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 595 views

Spring Break college touring
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 550 views

Silicon Valley, welcome to Database Valley
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 158 views


2018 guide to summer camps

Looking for something for the kids to do this summer, learn something new and have fun? The 2018 Summer Camp Guide features local camps for all ages and interests.

Find Camps Here