News

Locals among 14 defendants who plan to plead guilty in college-admissions bribery scam

Parents, a coach face jail time, hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines

Four Midpeninsula residents are among the 14 people who agreed to plead guilty in the national college-admissions bribery scandal, U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Andrew Lelling announced on Monday. The group is made up of 13 parents and one athletics coach, about a quarter of the total 50 people have been charged in the scheme.

The agreements, which must be presented before a judge no later than April 30, could lead to incarceration and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for the parents' roles in bribing college-entrance-exam officiants and college admissions and athletics staff to improve their children's chances of gaining entrance to top-tier universities. The officials passed false SAT and ACT test results and created bogus profiles for the students in sports they had minimal to no experience in, under the direction of Newport Beach resident William "Rick" Singer. He ran a college-admissions coaching business and funneled the bribes through a fake nonprofit organization he founded, the Key Worldwide Foundation, according to federal prosecutors.

The 13 parents include Menlo Park residents Marjorie Klapper, 50, and Peter Jan Sartorio, 53; Hillsborough residents Bruce Isackson, 61, and Davina Isackson, 55; and actress Felicity Huffman, 56. They each intend to plead guilty to one count of mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. In addition, Bruce Isackson plans to plead guilty to one count each of money laundering conspiracy and conspiracy to defraud the IRS.

Klapper paid Singer $15,000 to participate in the college entrance exam cheating scheme for her son, according to court documents.

The Isacksons agreed to pay Singer a total of $600,000 to have both of their daughters listed as recruited college athletes and to have false test scores for the younger of the two daughters. The couple also paid less on their federal income taxes by deducting the bribe payments as purported charitable contributions, according to court documents.

Sartorio paid $15,000 to participate in the college entrance exam cheating scheme for his daughter, according to court documents filed last Wednesday.

The penalties could be severe. There is no guarantee that the parents won't receive as much as 20 years in prison for their roles in the scandal. Mail fraud and honest services mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater. Conspiracy to commit money laundering has a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the money laundering. Conspiracy to defraud the United States or IRS carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.

The government will ask for incarceration at the low end of the U.S. sentencing guidelines and other statutory factors, prosecutors noted in each agreement. The decision is up to the judge.

In addition, all of the defendants would receive 12 months of supervised release; a special assessment of $100; restitution to be determined by the court; and forfeiture of any assets seized during investigation and prosecution.

Under their respective agreements, Klapper would pay a fine or penalty of $20,000; Sartorio would pay a $9,500 fine; Davina Isackson would pay a fine or penalty of $100,000; and Bruce Isackson would pay $150,000. The Isacksons have also agreed to cooperate with the government and the IRS and to correct any tax returns and pay delinquent taxes and fees. They have signed separate cooperation agreements with the government in any investigations, grand jury inquiries or court proceedings.

Huffman, 56, of Los Angeles, agreed to the same conditions as the other defendants in addition to a $20,000 fine. She originally paid $15,000 to participate in the college entrance exam cheating scheme for her oldest daughter. University of Texas at Austin coach Michael Center, 54, of Austin, Texas, plans to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud for labeling a child as a tennis recruit.

Plea and sentencing hearings have not yet been set. Attorneys for the local defendants couldn't immediately be reached.

Other local defendants in the case include:

Dr. Gregory and Amy Colburn of Palo Alto, who pleaded not guilty last Wednesday; Elizabeth and Manuel Henriquez of Atherton; Marci Palatella of Hillsborough; and William McGlashan of Mill Valley, who have made initial appearances in federal court in Boston but have not yet entered pleas.

Related content:

• Listen to the March 15 episode of "Behind the Headlines," where Palo Alto college adviser John Raftrey discusses the implications of the nationwide admissions bribery scandal, now available on our YouTube channel and podcast.

Stanford students file class action lawsuit in admissions scandal

Pressure over college admissions 'out of control'

Ex-global equity firm exec, a grad of Gunn High, implicated in admissions scam

Opinion: Making the college-admissions system more equitable

Opinion: Lessons parents should learn from the college-admissions scandal

Editorial: The audacity of privilege

$75K for a fake ACT score? Students say cheating happens without the big bucks

In response to college-admissions scandal, Stanford to probe policies, current athletic recruits

Palo Alto couple faces money-laundering charge in college-admissions scam

Following college-admissions indictments, feds investigate whether Stanford was lax in complying with financial-aid laws

Menlo Park father intends to plead guilty to an unspecified charge in college-admissions scam

Stanford expels student in connection with college fraud scheme

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

9 people like this
Posted by tired
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Apr 9, 2019 at 1:30 pm

If they robbed a person or stole from an employer, they'd go to jail. Because they're rich, they'll pay money which, in the big picture, is easy for them. Our system is broken.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Nationally renowned Indian restaurant expanding to Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,869 views

Summer travel: Is anything changing?
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 1,290 views

Premarital and Couples: "Our Deepest Fear" by Marianne Williamson
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,087 views

Cap On? Cap Off? Recycling Bottles is Confusing
By Laura Stec | 20 comments | 954 views