News

Tuesday: Menlo Park fire board to discuss concerns with JPA agreement

 

Faced with the complexity of the issue, the Menlo Park Fire Protection District has asked for more time to evaluate a proposal for the first new countywide joint powers authority operating agreement in 10 years.

The Emergency Medical Services JPA includes every fire agency in the county.

The agreement includes three parts: An emergency medical services agreement, a dispatch agreement and an agreement on automatic aid, which requires fire departments and districts to go into neighboring jurisdictions when help is needed, according to Menlo Park Fire Chief Harold Schapelhouman.

The extra time, if granted, could require the 10 San Mateo County fire agencies to extend the deadline by which the Menlo Park fire district could sign or not sign the new contract. The current contract expires June 30.

The EMS JPA agreement is on the agenda for discussion at the board's meeting on Tuesday, April 16.

The Menlo Park fire district is one of the wealthier districts in the county that offers a full array of services, so fire board members are concerned that the district's tax money could be used to subsidize other fire districts that may be consolidating or cutting back, according to Schapelhouman.

The most vocal of the five fire board members on the issue is Chuck Bernstein, who would like the district to get out of the JPA entirely. He argues that Menlo Park responds to twice as many calls in neighboring communities than it receives in aid.

"There are greater risks for the residents of the District, even as they shoulder

the costs of providing services to agencies that have not maintained their level of effort," Bernstein wrote in a memo to the board. "This is totally unacceptable. A new cooperative agreement must eliminate this outcome."

Bernstein would like the district to create automatic aid agreements with other agencies of its choice both inside and outside the county, and create reimbursement arrangements when the level of mutual aid is unbalanced, he said in the memo.

At the board's April 4 meeting, Schapelhouman said the agreement is working well overall. He said after the meeting that he also agrees officials should be looking at changes that can be made to realign things so they reflect current realities.

On the other hand, the fire chief thinks the district also has a moral obligation to the public to give service wherever it's needed.

He gave the example of Stanford Weekend Acres off Alpine Road, which is in the unincorporated area. Menlo Park's fire station is 1 mile away and it's 9 miles to the nearest San Mateo County station, he said.

"We wouldn't (refuse service there), and we're not going to," Schapelhouman said.

"We don't want to be an agency that says 'You don't subscribe to our service, so we'll let your house burn down.'"

Bernstein said that the Weekend Acres situation should be remedied by moving the property taxes earmarked for firefighting services there from the county coffers to the Menlo Park fire district or setting up an agreement where the district is reimbursed.

"We tried unsuccessfully to annex the area, but the county won't give up the taxes they pay for fire protection even though they don't provide fire protection," he said on April 8.

The district's grievances also include the JPA's makeup, according to fire board President Virginia Chang Kiraly. There are 22 voting members on the JPA board and 10 fire chiefs, a vestigial element that harkens back to when there were more agencies.

"Belmont, San Mateo and Foster City get three votes even though they only have one fire chief, while we also cover three cities and only have one vote," Schapelhouman said.

As for dispatch services, the fire chief thinks they are working well, adding that having the county dispatching first responders from one central location improves response times and reduces redundancy and confusion.

Bernstein, on the other hand, thinks the central dispatch system enables the current system of automatic aid.

There was a six-alarm fire in Redwood City in 2013 and all of Menlo Park's units were dispatched to fight it, leaving the service area unprotected, he said.

"We're not allowed to get help from Palo Alto because it's not in the JPA," he said.

"We should be able to negotiate an agreement with them."

The fire board on Tuesday is also scheduled to discuss a separate countywide ambulance contract that received only one bidder -- American Emergency Response (AMR). The county Board of Supervisors approved the ambulance contract at its meeting April 9.

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.

Comments

7 people like this
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Apr 16, 2019 at 6:31 am

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

The purpose of any JPA is to better serve the residents of the Fire District. The current JPA no longer does this and it should be abandoned and replaced with a new JPA that reflects the current realities.


Like this comment
Posted by Citizen
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Apr 17, 2019 at 8:35 am

Peter:
Great idea......but only one bidder. California state law states the fire district cannot provide their own ambulance services? They AMR, has us over a barrel.

The JPA and San Mateo County will vote for these agreements. Now what about the next ten years? Does the fire district have a 3 to 5 year plan to start their own services? Challenge the state law? Does the firefighters want to do transport services? what added expenses......Equipment, vehicles, etc....


2 people like this
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Apr 17, 2019 at 9:31 am

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

A new JPA would still, as required by State law, have the County responsible for transport/ambulances but the other elements of a new JPA should reflect the current realities.

There is no reason that a city without a fire department should vote on issues that only concern fire departments.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Peek inside the fine-dining Selby's, opening in Redwood City this summer
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 4,335 views

Homestead Faire at Hidden Villa 4/27
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,248 views

If you do nothing else, do These Three Things
By Sherry Listgarten | 9 comments | 1,230 views

Premarital and Couples: "You're Not Listening to Me!" may mean "I don't feel heard."
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,137 views

 

The Almanac Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "The Almanac Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 27th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 17th issue of The Almanac.

VOTE HERE