Tonight: Final decision expected on Ravenswood redwoods | News | Almanac Online |


Tonight: Final decision expected on Ravenswood redwoods

Seven trees on top of an underground garage at 1000 El Camino Real were slated for removal, but public outcry led to an appeal by residents, slated to be heard by the Menlo Park City Council tonight. (Photo by Adam Pardee.)

An appeal months in the making over the proposed felling of seven prominent redwood trees at the corner of El Camino Real and Ravenswood Avenue is scheduled to come to the Menlo Park City Council tonight (May 14) for a final decision.

In October, the Menlo Park Planning Commission approved plans by Matt Matteson, the owner of 1000 El Camino Real -- an office building at the corner of El Camino Real and Ravenswood Avenue -- to cut down seven redwood trees in order to repair a parking garage beneath, which has been damaged by water intrusion.

When some residents saw notices attached to the trees, some chose to appeal the commission's decision, expressing outrage and shock and urging the city to explore other options to preserve the trees. The Environmental Quality Commission then reviewed the appeal and, on March 27, voted 4-3 to uphold the Planning Commission's decision. In advance of that hearing, city staff researched eight different alternatives to save the trees, but determined that none was both feasible and reasonable.

The matter was again appealed, and so the City Council will be expected to make a final ruling on the decision.

Matteson said he's sad to see the trees go, but doesn't see a way around it. He's been managing the property since 1987, he said, and the trees were planted around 1982, so he's been responsible for the trees' upkeep most of their lives. He said he and his team worked to find a way to keep other trees along the El Camino Real frontage intact, but these seven really are in the way. He's planning to plant 14 new trees that have shallower roots to replace the redwoods.

Back when the redwoods were planted, he said, "people knew a whole lot less." Now, it's acknowledged that redwoods have deep, invasive root systems and are extremely thirsty trees.

"There's no question they shouldn't be planted where they were planted," he said. Redwoods belong in places like Portola Valley, Woodside and La Honda, where they have access to creeks and coastal fog, he said. A lot of building owners in urban environments who planted redwoods close by now "wish they hadn't," he said.

Some of the steel cable tendons in the foundation of the parking structure have failed. "We clearly have a compromised foundation," Matteson said. In his eyes, it's a "life-safety issue." The problem needs to be remedied as soon as possible, given the potential for an earthquake to strike, he added. He's also not comfortable with efforts to do excavation that could undermine the root system without cutting down the trees -- what if a tree were to fail and fall onto El Camino Real during rush hour? That's a liability he has to consider, he said.

Those who are urging the city to spare the redwoods say trees are the city's symbol. Some ask that additional efforts be devoted to exploring alternatives to save the trees.

"Trees are the symbol of Menlo Park for a good reason, it’s what gives our city (its) special character," wrote resident Alex Komoroske in an email to the City Council.

"This grove is a stellar example of what continues to make Menlo Park livable despite the persistent push of development," wrote resident Mary Kenney in an email to council members. "The trees are visible even before you enter Menlo Park and give one hope that Menlo Park is a place where we figure out how to coexist with everything that lives here, flora and fauna included."

Access the nearly 400-page staff report here.

The Menlo Park City Council will meet at 7 p.m. in the council chambers at 701 Laurel St. in the Menlo Park Civic Center.

Access the meeting agenda here and stream the meeting online here.

Previous coverage:

● January 2019: Public outcry prompts further scrutiny for prominent redwoods

● March 2019: Raging to save the redwoods

● April 2019: Despite protests, commission upholds removal of redwoods

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


4 people like this
Posted by Cayo
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on May 14, 2019 at 7:19 pm

"Some of the steel cable tendons in the foundation of the parking structure have failed." How is removing the trees going to fix that problem? I understand that removing the trees should keep it from getting worse, but how will the steel tendons be repaired or replaced? Very sad, and scary.

Like this comment
Posted by Brian
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on May 15, 2019 at 10:00 am

From the Mercury News:
"The building needs structural repairs because steel tendons in the ceiling of its underground parking garage have broken due to water damage and erosion, according to a city staff report.

Completing the repairs would require severing the roots of the redwood trees to an extent that would decrease their stability, making them prone to toppling, the report states."

It is interesting to see the difference in priorities between the last city council and this one. The previous council voted to not let a family remove a redwood tree that was deemed by 3 different arborists (not the city arborist) as a danger and having the potential to fail and damage houses and/or cause injury. Instead they said the family would need to "mitigate" the risk as a large personal cost to them.

In this case I am not sure what the right answer is, they are not a native species to this area nor are they particularly old. I think requiring the owner to plant additional trees around Menlo is a good compromise.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Los Altos's State of Mind opening NYC-inspired pizza shop in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 8,460 views

Wait, wait – we’re working on it
By Diana Diamond | 19 comments | 2,628 views

My Pet Peeves
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 7 comments | 2,057 views

Premarital and Couples: Here Be Dragons!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,379 views

Goodbye toy stores
By Cheryl Bac | 8 comments | 1,370 views


Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

View Details