News

'This is not saying we're anti-charter.' Ravenswood school board backs state charter bills

Charter leaders, parents urge trustees against limiting parent choice

Students in Thomas Thimes and Fernando Salazar's second-grade class dive into books during independent reading time at Kipp Valiant Community Prep in East Palo Alto. Photo by Veronica Weber.

The Ravenswood City school board in East Palo Alto unanimously approved Thursday night a charter school moratorium that throws their support behind a raft of state legislation that they insist is not anti-charter, but rather pro-local control.

The controversial legislation aims to increase oversight of charter schools in California, which has more charter schools and students than any other state, accounting for 10% of the state's K-12 enrollment. Supporters of traditional public schools say this growth is threatening the fiscal and educational health of neighborhood schools, while charter school advocates defend charters as autonomous alternatives that can meet low-income and minority families' demands for better public education. The divisive fight between the two camps is playing out throughout California, from the halls of the state Capitol to school districts across the state, including in East Palo Alto.

"I am not anti-charter but I am pro-public schools," said Ronda White, president of the Ravenswood Teachers Association, which along with the district's classified employees union brought the moratorium to the board. "No school district should have to take on financial burdens that reduce resources for students who attend the local public schools."

The resolution supports four state bills that would: enact a five-year statewide cap on charter schools; allow agencies to consider the facilities, fiscal and academic impacts on districts in granting charters; remove the right to appeal if a charter's application is denied; and ensure local governing boards have control over all decisions related to charter schools' authorizations and renewals, doing away with charters ability to appeal denials at the county and state level (This last bill, Assembly Bill 1505, passed the Assembly this week on a narrow 44-19-17 vote). Gov. Gavin Newsom also signed into law this spring a bill that requires charters to follow the same laws governing open meetings, public records and conflicts of interest that apply to school districts.

Several Ravenswood teachers advocated for the moratorium on Thursday night, including one who delivered a list of signatures from her colleagues in support.

"It frustrates me to think that your hands are tied when a charter comes," said CostaƱo Elementary School teacher Jesusita Rivera. "I'm not against charters. I'm just against not having the transparency and I'm against the board not being able to make decisions ... and not being able to say 'no'" to new charter schools.

Several local charter school leaders and parents attended the meeting and urged the board against approving the moratorium. Kate Belden, principal of Kipp Valiant Community Prep in East Palo Alto, told the board that the resolution "seeks to cut off school choice for the thousands of East Palo Alto families you represent.

"We share your beliefs that public charter schools should be held accountable for results," Belden said. "We believe in transparency and accountability and gladly comply with ongoing requirements."

The proposed legislation, she said, is "misleading and too far-reaching and any board resolution in support (of it) would be against the interest of East Palo Alto students and families."

Noting that the resolution will not prevent any existing charter schools from operating in East Palo Alto, trustees maintained that their action does not limit parent choice.

"I see it as bringing equality," said Vice President Stephanie Fitch, who has taught in both public and charter schools. "Everyone wants the same great things for our kids and this helps with that."

Trustees lauded the resolution for bringing more transparency to charter schools, which they argued should actually empower parents to make more informed choices for their children.

Under the resolution, the district will conduct a public analysis of existing and potential new charter schools, including the demographics of charter school students in East Palo Alto, the net fiscal impact of existing charter schools on the district, student discipline statistics at charters, the number and reasons why students leave charter schools and teacher credentialing and retention.

"This is not saying we're anti-charter," said board President Tamara Sobomehin. "This is saying the same expectations we have of ourselves in this public school district we need to have the same expectations for the public charters also. This is something I'd expect in my children's school or anywhere else."

Other school districts, public agencies and organizations have approved near-identical charter school moratoriums in recent months, including the Los Angeles Unified, West Contra Costa Unified and Anaheim Union High school districts; and the cities of Richmond and Huntington Park.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by MP Resident
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 24, 2019 at 10:08 pm

Perhaps the Ravenswood district should put less effort into fighting charters (which are actually educating kids in EPA and EMP) and more effort into righting their own ship. The current state of the district doesn't even appear to be baby-sitting, let alone education.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Natural wine bar Salvaje opens in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,861 views

Cap On? Cap Off? Recycling Bottles is Confusing
By Laura Stec | 41 comments | 1,761 views

Premarital and Couples: "Our Deepest Fear" by Marianne Williamson
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,505 views

Everything you've always wanted to know ...
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 1,070 views

Menlo Park Planning For Civic Projects Needs A Major Reboot. (Part 1)
By Dana Hendrickson | 1 comment | 118 views