'I don't think there is trust on this board.' Fissures emerge between East Palo Alto school trustees during retreat

Strategic planning process sparks tensions, disagreement among Ravenswood board members

Nine months after an election created new dynamics on the Ravenswood City School District Board of Education, the new and old trustees are struggling to find common ground.

Tension flared up during a five-hour retreat on Saturday, when two longer-serving board members said they have felt dismissed by new leadership and left out of the district's recently launched effort to develop a long-term strategic plan.

"I'm OK with new perspectives … as long as they come with the intention of serving students well," said Trustee Ana Maria Pulido. "What I'm concerned about is people’s intentions. Are they coming here to add or subtract? Are they coming to dismantle the progress we did make and set us even further back?

"I don't think there is trust on this board," she said.

Under interim Superintendent Gina Sudaria's leadership, the district created this summer a 21-member steering committee, including two board members, administrators, parents and community leaders, to lead the work of drafting a new strategic plan before presenting a final version to the board in December. Sudaria told the Weekly that she compiled a list of possible members with Attuned Education Partners, a firm the board hired to support the strategic planning process. The firm provided her a list of other districts' steering committees membership and she selected people to represent similar groups, including board members, administrators, parents, teachers, local elected officials and faith-based leaders.

Pulido and Trustee Sharifa Wilson sharply criticized the strategic planning effort as lacking transparency and inclusion of the full board. Pulido was named to the committee at her request but has since declined to participate given her concerns. She said it was unclear how members were chosen and was concerned that all of the district's schools were not represented. She and Trustee Sharifa Wilson advocated for closer board involvement in the process than they thought had been provided for.

"The board's voice should be a priority," Wilson said. "That's what the uneasiness on my part is about — feeling like my voice is tagged on. It's like, who's driving this ship?"

Board President Tamara Sobomehin defended the process as inclusive and responsive to board feedback. Sudaria added committee members in response to Pulido's concerns, raised at the board's last meeting, including additional staff and parents to represent all schools and community partners.

Sobomehin noted she asked the consultant leading the process to add more points throughout when the full board will be involved and can provide input.

Vice President Stephanie Fitch said she thought the process should be "more tied down to where the schools actually are" rather than driven from the top down, but understood her colleagues' desire to be more involved.

The four trustees (Marielena Gaona Mendoza was absent) ultimately agreed to send the committee structure back to the drawing board. They will take formal action at their next meeting to constitute it as a board committee. Sudaria will make recommendations for members and solicit suggestions from all trustees; the final membership of the group will be subject to full board approval. Sobomehin and Pulido will also meet with the Attuned Education Partners consultants to review the process.

Earlier in the meeting, Sobomehin — who along with Fitch was elected in November — acknowledged that board members have been "openly uncivil" with each other. She urged her colleagues to come together despite any differences in opinion.

"We've got to be a stronghold together," she said.

"New ideas and perspectives aren't necessarily putting down" (what's been done before), Fitch said. "The point of having elections every few years is because you need that new perspective coming in.

"I don't think this district has moved as quickly as it needs to," she continued. "Bureaucracy makes that hard. … But we can affect this system, here, and I want to do that but I can't do that alone and I'm not supposed to do it alone."

Finding ways to work together productively as a board will be especially critical this year, as the K-8 district is looking at closing schools due to declining enrollment.

The board also agreed on Saturday to take the next step to launch a search for a permanent superintendent by formally voting to do so at its next meeting this Thursday, Aug. 22. Sudaria has led the district on a temporary basis since February, after former Superintendent Gloria Hernandez-Goff was placed on paid administrative leave and then forced to resign.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


8 people like this
Posted by Brian
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Aug 19, 2019 at 10:28 am

"Are they coming to dismantle the progress we did make and set us even further back?"

What progress had the old School board made? The schools in the Ravenswood School District have consistently been some of the lowest in the state, getting ratings of 2 or 3 out of 10. That does not leave a lot of room to get worse. The old school board did nothing to improve the schools, instead they enabled the previous Superintendent to dismantle what was working well (principals that were making good progress) and to hire her son at a high salary. The old board and superintendent should be investigated and charges brought if they were found to act inappropriately. What they are doing now, the same they have done in the past, it stop anything that would provide a better education for the kids.

14 people like this
Posted by EPA Resident
a resident of another community
on Aug 19, 2019 at 2:01 pm

Ana Pulida and Sharifa Wilson are upset that they are no longer able to get their way on School Board, which in the past included sinecure positions for their friends and family, the ability to fire people who questioned their leadership, and steer contracts in the direction of their supporters, who then kicked back money to their campaigns. Transparency and professionalism are being implemented in Ravenswood, and the only people threatened by this are folks who got jobs because of who they know, not their ability to perform their duties.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Why is it becoming increasingly impossible to open a restaurant on the Peninsula?
By Elena Kadvany | 29 comments | 5,399 views

An Easy Emissions Win
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 1,001 views

Helping Partners Become Couples (vs. Helping Couples Become Partners)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 755 views

It just takes time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 638 views

Sugar Detective
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 587 views


Register now!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

More Info