News

Woodside Planning Commission refines Glens rules changes

 

The Woodside Planning Department has worked out a compromise for the Glens neighborhood that it hopes will satisfy people who want to expand their homes while maintaining reasonable limits to please those who want to minimize the effects of growth.

The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal developed by the department at a hearing Wednesday, Oct. 2, which will come back to the commission one more time on Oct. 16 before the Town Council takes it under consideration, probably in November, according to Sage Schaan, principal planner with the town.

Under the proposal, maximum home sizes in the Glens could be increased on a sliding scale, according to the staff report on the proposed new rules.

A home on the 3,850-square-foot lot, the smallest in the neighborhood, could have a maximum floor area of 1,940 square feet, while a residence on a 14,000-square-foot lot could have up to 3,000 square feet of floor area.

Homes with 14,000- to 20,000-square-foot lots would be allowed to expand to 3,000 square feet, while homes with lots that are larger than 20,000 square feet could increase to a maximum of 4,200 square feet in size.

The plan would also provide incentives for owners of homes with less than 3,000 square feet of total floor area to build garages, but not be required to count the floor area of the garage toward the maximum floor area of the house.

The proposal also allows setbacks from the street and property lines as low as 5 feet for homes on the smallest lots.

About 73% of all existing building footprints are set off to one side of the lot, according to the staff report.

"Continuing along nonconforming setback lines would preserve the existing development pattern, thereby maintaining open space and privacy," according to the report.

Parking on the road right of way will also count as on-site parking toward a requirement of having four on-site parking spaces per home.

The road right-of-way can include utility poles, electric lines and sidewalks that are outside the paved portion of the road, Schaan said.

The proposed new rules come after a year of discussion, site visitations and hearings involving residents who want to expand their properties, but the proposal still received opposition at the meeting from some residents concerned about traffic congestion, creating and preserving escape routes during an emergency, parking, noise and other factors.

"Over time, larger properties will result in greater population and more cars," said Glens resident Harvey Rosenthal. "The proposal for increased house size is untenable with vehicles in the roadway impeding traffic and emergency vehicles being unable to negotiate our substandard roads."

Others disagreed, pointing to the increased safety from fire and other disasters of a home that has been upgraded and remodeled, among other factors.

"Change is inevitable, it's going to happen," said Planning Commissioner Aydan Kutay. "I'm not that concerned about increasing density if it's an opportunity to build a safer home."

---

Sign up for Almanac Express to get news updates. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Or show your support for local journalism by subscribing.

RAN IN PRINT

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Glens Resident
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Glens
on Oct 8, 2019 at 2:26 pm

I'd like to thank Rick Radin for his ongoing reporting of the efforts by Glens residents to work on an agreement with the Town about zoning and building in the geographically constrained Woodside Glens area. I'd like to emphasize the point made by Planning Commissioner Aydan Kutay about safety and continue to urge the Town to develop code changes as necessary to help Glens residnts more easily and affordably repair old and unsafe structures, especially given what happened in Paradise and other communities in the last few years. If too many dollars or hurdles are presented, I fear many will not be able to afford let alone attempt improvements.


Like this comment
Posted by Woodside
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Glens
on Oct 11, 2019 at 10:15 am

More propaganda from overpaid town “officials”. For most it’s all about safety and not about making bigger homes. For others it’s NIMBY. Part of the story is being told. Many aren’t that surprised.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Gluten-free bakery Misfits Bakehouse is reborn in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,710 views

What to do with all those cardboard boxes
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 2,207 views

Premarital and Couples: The "Right" Way to Eat an Artichoke
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,679 views

What did you learn last week?
By Sherry Listgarten | 6 comments | 1,075 views

Menlo Park Can Learn A Lot from Palo Alto (Part 1)
By Dana Hendrickson | 3 comments | 824 views

 

Race Results Are In

Thank you for joining us at the 35th annual Moonlight Run & Walk! All proceeds benefit the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday fund, supporting local nonprofits serving children and families.

Click for Race Results