News

Editorial: Atherton shows how not to be a good neighbor

When Atherton leaders first began making noises about how the town was paying far more than "its share" in taxes to the fire district that serves it, and the possibility of detaching from the district as a result, it was almost inconceivable that the idea of such a separation would survive. Hard to believe that it wouldn't die a quick, well-deserved death after town officials considered the consequences of such a detachment to the town and to the surrounding communities that are also served by the first-rate Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

The fact that not only has the idea survived, but that the town is paying tens of thousands of dollars to study and consider it is astounding. Even though two City Council members — first Elizabeth Lewis then Mayor Rick DeGolia — have shown the good sense to publicly oppose it, council members Cary Wiest, Mike Lempres and Bill Widmer insist on pursuing this folly.

The notion that Atherton taxpayers, who own some of the highest-valued property in the entire country, are somehow being abused by having to bear a higher proportion of the cost for emergency services in the wider community is absurd. And sad. It rejects the widely held principles of a just society, and the values that underpin the belief in a common good that ensures that all citizens — rich or poor, and everyone in between — are entitled to equal access to education, medical care and emergency services.

The argument of town officials who are pushing for this move is that property tax revenue from Atherton, whose residents make up 8% of the population served by the fire district, constitutes about 32% of the district's property tax revenue. As a result, they assert, Atherton property owners "subsidize" emergency services for the district's poorer communities, such as East Palo Alto, portions of Menlo Park and unincorporated areas. Those figures come from a consultant's study, released in 2018, that considered merely the bottom line of tax contributions from Atherton versus the percentage of population served. Calculations based on such rudimentary information, with no consideration of other factors that might be involved in providing emergency services to the town, make the figures suspect right out of the gate.

But aside from that, the premise that the wealthiest citizens of a wider community shouldn't bear more of the financial burden to keep that community safe and healthy is one that should be soundly rejected by members of a commonwealth whose stability depends on strong institutions that support everyone.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Almanac Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

After more than a year of discussing this misguided notion, which gained traction after the release of the costly consultant's study, and of souring the relationship between the town and the fire district, the council majority appears unwilling to change course. But in January, Councilwoman Lewis showed the courage to question pursuit of detachment, and Mayor DeGolia, early this month, added his voice in opposition.

"I think that it is a waste of time and money to pursue detachment from the fire district," he told The Almanac. "I don't think that detachment would benefit Atherton residents because I believe that we get better service from (the Menlo Park fire district) than we could get from any alternative service provider" given the district's history of service to the community.

Lewis and DeGolia are the voices of reason in this debate, and they deserve kudos from people who care about keeping their emergency services strong and their neighbors — even those without the abundance of resources enjoyed by the wealthiest residents of our greater community — safe. Atherton's withdrawal from the district would severely impact the fire agency's budget and the services it would be able to provide to the wider community.

Local resident Jim Lewis floated an idea that, if Atherton leaders can't bring themselves to change course at this point, might be worth trying: Call upon a mediator to help the town and the fire district work through the questions surrounding the matter. This option would be less costly and, one would hope, more productive and less damaging to the relationship between the town and the fire district, which has taken a hit as the talk of detachment has dragged on.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Editorial: Atherton shows how not to be a good neighbor

Uploaded: Tue, Mar 24, 2020, 4:10 pm

When Atherton leaders first began making noises about how the town was paying far more than "its share" in taxes to the fire district that serves it, and the possibility of detaching from the district as a result, it was almost inconceivable that the idea of such a separation would survive. Hard to believe that it wouldn't die a quick, well-deserved death after town officials considered the consequences of such a detachment to the town and to the surrounding communities that are also served by the first-rate Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

The fact that not only has the idea survived, but that the town is paying tens of thousands of dollars to study and consider it is astounding. Even though two City Council members — first Elizabeth Lewis then Mayor Rick DeGolia — have shown the good sense to publicly oppose it, council members Cary Wiest, Mike Lempres and Bill Widmer insist on pursuing this folly.

The notion that Atherton taxpayers, who own some of the highest-valued property in the entire country, are somehow being abused by having to bear a higher proportion of the cost for emergency services in the wider community is absurd. And sad. It rejects the widely held principles of a just society, and the values that underpin the belief in a common good that ensures that all citizens — rich or poor, and everyone in between — are entitled to equal access to education, medical care and emergency services.

The argument of town officials who are pushing for this move is that property tax revenue from Atherton, whose residents make up 8% of the population served by the fire district, constitutes about 32% of the district's property tax revenue. As a result, they assert, Atherton property owners "subsidize" emergency services for the district's poorer communities, such as East Palo Alto, portions of Menlo Park and unincorporated areas. Those figures come from a consultant's study, released in 2018, that considered merely the bottom line of tax contributions from Atherton versus the percentage of population served. Calculations based on such rudimentary information, with no consideration of other factors that might be involved in providing emergency services to the town, make the figures suspect right out of the gate.

But aside from that, the premise that the wealthiest citizens of a wider community shouldn't bear more of the financial burden to keep that community safe and healthy is one that should be soundly rejected by members of a commonwealth whose stability depends on strong institutions that support everyone.

After more than a year of discussing this misguided notion, which gained traction after the release of the costly consultant's study, and of souring the relationship between the town and the fire district, the council majority appears unwilling to change course. But in January, Councilwoman Lewis showed the courage to question pursuit of detachment, and Mayor DeGolia, early this month, added his voice in opposition.

"I think that it is a waste of time and money to pursue detachment from the fire district," he told The Almanac. "I don't think that detachment would benefit Atherton residents because I believe that we get better service from (the Menlo Park fire district) than we could get from any alternative service provider" given the district's history of service to the community.

Lewis and DeGolia are the voices of reason in this debate, and they deserve kudos from people who care about keeping their emergency services strong and their neighbors — even those without the abundance of resources enjoyed by the wealthiest residents of our greater community — safe. Atherton's withdrawal from the district would severely impact the fire agency's budget and the services it would be able to provide to the wider community.

Local resident Jim Lewis floated an idea that, if Atherton leaders can't bring themselves to change course at this point, might be worth trying: Call upon a mediator to help the town and the fire district work through the questions surrounding the matter. This option would be less costly and, one would hope, more productive and less damaging to the relationship between the town and the fire district, which has taken a hit as the talk of detachment has dragged on.

Comments

Walsh Road Reporter
Atherton: West of Alameda
on Mar 24, 2020 at 6:41 pm
Walsh Road Reporter, Atherton: West of Alameda
on Mar 24, 2020 at 6:41 pm
33 people like this

I am delighted to find this thoughtful editorial in our local paper.

I'm home,quarantined, so my thoughts about what community I belong to has a number of answers. Right now, our community is the entire world as we depend on our neighbors world-wide to control as much as possible the coronavirus. I'm sure that our splendid fire district is ready to act when they are called to action--not an Atherton decision, but at least regional one to make.

This raises the question of the common good. Several years ago during discussion of a new Atherton Library, I saw a comment to the effect that the library as planned was too large, that it would draw in people who should go to other libraries closer to their own homes because this library should be for people of Atherton who had paid into a tax fund for building an eventual replacement. However, this was a misunderstanding of who comprise the group of people served. The libraries of San Mateo County operate as a single library, allowing a single catalog and checking out materials from any collection in the county and delivery of materials to one's home library or other library of choice. This common understanding of our community encompasses our entire county.

It is my hope that the narrow view of community be widened, recognizing we are fortunate to have our extraordinary fire district serving our local area, but also serving the nation (and perhaps beyond). Local specially trained fire personnel went to Kansas and took charge of rebuilding a town completely destroyed by hurricanes. After the terrible Challenger disaster, a team from here retrieved the crews' remains from the ocean. I'm sure there are many more instances of the greater geography cared for by this district such as the firestorms in the last two years.

We live in the wider community. Let's be grateful that our taxes make the special possible and that we in a way beyond the physical boundary of the Town of Atherton come together for the greater good of all.


Renee Batti, editor
Menlo Park: other
on Mar 25, 2020 at 8:50 am
Renee Batti, editor, Menlo Park: other
on Mar 25, 2020 at 8:50 am
3 people like this

This thread is being locked to further comment to avoid duplication. We welcome your comments on this topic here:

Web Link


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.