News

Menlo Park becomes first U.S. city to set goal to be carbon neutral by 2030

Menlo Park became the first city in the U.S. to set a goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2030 on Tuesday when the City Council moved forward with a new plan to slash carbon emissions citywide.

Menlo Park is the first U.S. city to set this goal, according to Menlo Park environmental nonprofit Menlo Spark. The city aims to achieve it by cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 90% from 2005 levels and focusing on carbon removal efforts for the remaining 10%.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic fallout associated with it struck, the city's Environmental Quality Commission, which has been developing recommendations for the plan, has narrowed the scope of the project from 77 strategies to six, for now.

The updated climate action plan would replace the city's current goal, which is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 27% below 2005 levels by 2020. The most current data, from 2017, indicates the city has reduced emissions by about 18.6%.

By 2030, the city of Menlo Park hopes to cut greenhouse gas emissions to 10% of its 2005 emissions. Courtesy city of Menlo Park.

The new climate action plan would call on Menlo Park to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90% of 2005 levels by 2030, to about 34,900 tons down from 349,000 tons in 2005. This would be done by dramatically cutting the amount of greenhouse gases being generated from vehicles, natural gas and waste, and completely eliminating the amount of greenhouse gases from generating electricity. That would be done through the city's partnership with Peninsula Clean Energy, which currently provides 90% clean and renewable energy. The local nonprofit energy provider is working to be greenhouse gas free by 2021 and provide 100% renewable energy around the clock by 2025, according to its website.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Almanac Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Even so, those six strategies are unlikely to have universal support throughout the community, council members said.

They are: explore converting 95% of buildings in the city to all-electric by 2030; set citywide goals to increase electric vehicle use and decrease gasoline sales; expand access to charging for electric vehicles citywide; reduce the annual average miles of vehicle travel per capita by 25% (or another yet-to-be determined goal); stop using fossil fuels for city operations; and create a plan to protect the community from sea level rise and flooding by July 2021.

The council agreed that staff would prioritize the first, third and fifth of those goals.

The step that could reduce greenhouse gas emissions the most annually would be to convert buildings from natural-gas burning ones to all-electric ones, according to Sustainability Manager Rebecca Lucky, and could reduce emissions by between 52,000 and 86,000 tons per year. Halting the use of natural gas citywide would generate reductions on the higher end of that spectrum. Alternatively, and less disruptively, the city could pass a "burnout ordinance."

Such an ordinance would mandate that when a gas furnace burns out or stops working it has to be replaced with an electric heat pump.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Peninsula Clean Energy has offered to provide technical support to help, said Josie Gaillard, environmental quality commissioner. It also offers a water heater rebate and plans to roll out a similar program for space heaters, she said.

Vice Mayor Drew Combs said that one potential obstacle to such an ordinance is that when a gas furnace burns out, a household is in a situation of urgent need. They don't have hot water without it, and it may be difficult to ask them to invest in new electrical wiring that could take time to install, all while they're without hot water. He expressed overall support for the initiative, though.

One of the initial proposals for the first goal was to consider converting 100% of all buildings to all electric systems, but past efforts in pushing for more electricity in new buildings through the city's new "reach" codes generated pushback from property owners like John Tarlton, whose tenants include biotech labs that require gas stoves for scientific purposes, and some chefs who prefer to cook with gas stoves. Council members Catherine Carlton and Ray Mueller pared back the initial proposal to converting 95% of buildings to all-electric, and noted that there would probably be pushback from the community.

"This seems like a really herculean undertaking," Combs said.

Altogether, Gaillard said, an expected value analysis model found that if the city were to invest $1.5 million in the city's climate action plan, it could avoid an estimated $144 million in future costs.

"That seems like a great investment of precious city resources," she said.

Taking action now is critical, Gaillard said, citing scientific research.

The U.N. has reported that global warming is likely to reach 1.5 degrees of planetary heating between 2030 and 2052. If humans aren't able to cap global warming at that level, there could be "drastic and irreversible planetary changes," according to a staff report. To do that, greenhouse gas emissions planetwide should be decreased by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030 and reach "net zero" by 2050, the report said.

Incentives alone won't produce those reductions, Gaillard said. "We need incentives plus mandates."

Council members acknowledged that their plan may be a reach.

"We cannot be Pollyannaish there will be backlash when we have this discussion," Mueller said. "We have to figure out what the community is willing to accept, and, candidly, we may not be able to get there all the way."

"These goals are aspirational, and they're meant to be aspirational," Councilwoman Betsy Nash said. "If we don't have that aspiration, we're never going to tackle the climate crisis."

Correction: A previous version inaccurately stated that the city would prioritize the first, second and fifth of the steps to reduce greenhouse gases. The city will prioritize the first, third and fifth, Lucky said.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Menlo Park becomes first U.S. city to set goal to be carbon neutral by 2030

by / Almanac

Uploaded: Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 11:24 am

Menlo Park became the first city in the U.S. to set a goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2030 on Tuesday when the City Council moved forward with a new plan to slash carbon emissions citywide.

Menlo Park is the first U.S. city to set this goal, according to Menlo Park environmental nonprofit Menlo Spark. The city aims to achieve it by cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 90% from 2005 levels and focusing on carbon removal efforts for the remaining 10%.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic fallout associated with it struck, the city's Environmental Quality Commission, which has been developing recommendations for the plan, has narrowed the scope of the project from 77 strategies to six, for now.

The updated climate action plan would replace the city's current goal, which is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 27% below 2005 levels by 2020. The most current data, from 2017, indicates the city has reduced emissions by about 18.6%.

The new climate action plan would call on Menlo Park to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90% of 2005 levels by 2030, to about 34,900 tons down from 349,000 tons in 2005. This would be done by dramatically cutting the amount of greenhouse gases being generated from vehicles, natural gas and waste, and completely eliminating the amount of greenhouse gases from generating electricity. That would be done through the city's partnership with Peninsula Clean Energy, which currently provides 90% clean and renewable energy. The local nonprofit energy provider is working to be greenhouse gas free by 2021 and provide 100% renewable energy around the clock by 2025, according to its website.

Even so, those six strategies are unlikely to have universal support throughout the community, council members said.

They are: explore converting 95% of buildings in the city to all-electric by 2030; set citywide goals to increase electric vehicle use and decrease gasoline sales; expand access to charging for electric vehicles citywide; reduce the annual average miles of vehicle travel per capita by 25% (or another yet-to-be determined goal); stop using fossil fuels for city operations; and create a plan to protect the community from sea level rise and flooding by July 2021.

The council agreed that staff would prioritize the first, third and fifth of those goals.

The step that could reduce greenhouse gas emissions the most annually would be to convert buildings from natural-gas burning ones to all-electric ones, according to Sustainability Manager Rebecca Lucky, and could reduce emissions by between 52,000 and 86,000 tons per year. Halting the use of natural gas citywide would generate reductions on the higher end of that spectrum. Alternatively, and less disruptively, the city could pass a "burnout ordinance."

Such an ordinance would mandate that when a gas furnace burns out or stops working it has to be replaced with an electric heat pump.

Peninsula Clean Energy has offered to provide technical support to help, said Josie Gaillard, environmental quality commissioner. It also offers a water heater rebate and plans to roll out a similar program for space heaters, she said.

Vice Mayor Drew Combs said that one potential obstacle to such an ordinance is that when a gas furnace burns out, a household is in a situation of urgent need. They don't have hot water without it, and it may be difficult to ask them to invest in new electrical wiring that could take time to install, all while they're without hot water. He expressed overall support for the initiative, though.

One of the initial proposals for the first goal was to consider converting 100% of all buildings to all electric systems, but past efforts in pushing for more electricity in new buildings through the city's new "reach" codes generated pushback from property owners like John Tarlton, whose tenants include biotech labs that require gas stoves for scientific purposes, and some chefs who prefer to cook with gas stoves. Council members Catherine Carlton and Ray Mueller pared back the initial proposal to converting 95% of buildings to all-electric, and noted that there would probably be pushback from the community.

"This seems like a really herculean undertaking," Combs said.

Altogether, Gaillard said, an expected value analysis model found that if the city were to invest $1.5 million in the city's climate action plan, it could avoid an estimated $144 million in future costs.

"That seems like a great investment of precious city resources," she said.

Taking action now is critical, Gaillard said, citing scientific research.

The U.N. has reported that global warming is likely to reach 1.5 degrees of planetary heating between 2030 and 2052. If humans aren't able to cap global warming at that level, there could be "drastic and irreversible planetary changes," according to a staff report. To do that, greenhouse gas emissions planetwide should be decreased by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030 and reach "net zero" by 2050, the report said.

Incentives alone won't produce those reductions, Gaillard said. "We need incentives plus mandates."

Council members acknowledged that their plan may be a reach.

"We cannot be Pollyannaish there will be backlash when we have this discussion," Mueller said. "We have to figure out what the community is willing to accept, and, candidly, we may not be able to get there all the way."

"These goals are aspirational, and they're meant to be aspirational," Councilwoman Betsy Nash said. "If we don't have that aspiration, we're never going to tackle the climate crisis."

Correction: A previous version inaccurately stated that the city would prioritize the first, second and fifth of the steps to reduce greenhouse gases. The city will prioritize the first, third and fifth, Lucky said.

Comments

Laura
Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Jul 16, 2020 at 2:03 pm
Laura , Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Jul 16, 2020 at 2:03 pm
14 people like this


How will they manage the huge increase of pollution from traffic along El Camino corridor as a result of the many new developments being built there?


CyberVoter
Atherton: other
on Jul 16, 2020 at 2:08 pm
CyberVoter, Atherton: other
on Jul 16, 2020 at 2:08 pm
19 people like this

This will kill many small businesses and be financial hardship for many individuals , with no real impact on the environment. PG&E already charges us 3X the US average for electricity & das as the average US utility. This will make it even worse.

Does anyone care about the economic well-being of our residents in this very difficult time? They should be looking for ways to reduces consumers costs & not raise them. Apparently the leadership is too rich to care about the impact of COVID on the local economy.


Diane Bailey
another community
on Jul 16, 2020 at 2:28 pm
Diane Bailey, another community
on Jul 16, 2020 at 2:28 pm
34 people like this

Menlo Park City Council really stepped up on this Climate Action Plan with a bold vision and the dedication to continue their much-needed climate leadership in the midst of a pandemic and difficult economic outlook. Huge thanks to Mayor Taylor, City Council Members, and the Environmental Quality Commissioners who created a top notch Plan for the City. As Commissioner Gaillard states, this is a smart investment for Menlo Park:

"Altogether, Gaillard said, an expected value analysis model found that if the city were to invest $1.5 million in the city's climate action plan, it could avoid an estimated $144 million in future costs."

Menlo Spark will be there to work with the City and help support the Climate Measures in this Plan to make them successful towards a zero carbon, clean energy, prosperous future for Menlo Park.


Whatever
Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:28 pm
Whatever, Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:28 pm
17 people like this

Well I can see this going on the ballot. It's almost like the thought police. What do they expect people to do when there are major power outages? You can always cook and get hot water with gas. Folks are going to hate the added cost of using electricity over gas. Yep definitely see the whole thing becoming a very expensive ballot issue.
We and I suspect many others enjoy our gas furnaces, gas water heaters, gas dryers and gas stove tops.
Wonder if folks will start putting in LPG and propane tanks.


Joseph E. Davis
Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:31 pm
Joseph E. Davis, Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:31 pm
20 people like this

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, a economic collapse greater than the Great Depression is unfolding. But doubtless the utopian planners of the Menlo Park City Council have factored this into their detailed plans to manage the lives of their residents.


Whatever
Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Whatever, Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:35 pm
15 people like this

One more thing how many houses, apts, commercial buildings would have to rewire to handle the increases in amperage used? That is very very expensive! You'll see a lot of double and triple lugging on older electrical panels. Would current electricity loads on outside wiring be sufficient?


S Fernandez
Menlo Park: The Willows
on Jul 16, 2020 at 5:41 pm
S Fernandez, Menlo Park: The Willows
on Jul 16, 2020 at 5:41 pm
6 people like this

Making the transition from gas + electric to fully electric easier and less costly can facilitate this transition. We are in the middle of it. PG&E wanted to charge us $3,000 just to cut our gas permanently. Needless to say, the gas still reaches our home, even though we use no gas. It has taken us 1 year to get PG&E to approve our project of increasing the power in our electrical panel. We have to update the pipes where the wires go from the PG&E connection to our home, meaning digging a 15 feet trench to put the new pipes. We had to dig close to the gas pipe that still is active (because of the $3,000 PG&E fee). The cost of the trenching and updating pipe where the new wires run is going to be more than $5,000. Meanwhile, San Francisco works with the existing infrastructure and allows existing homes to convert to all-electric to run the new wires through the existing wire pipes. If we are really serious about moving to cleaner energies, the city and PG&E need to be realistic about how to convert existing homes. Otherwise only the new homes will be fully electric.


Much Ado About Nothing
Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Jul 16, 2020 at 8:28 pm
Much Ado About Nothing, Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Jul 16, 2020 at 8:28 pm
3 people like this

The Council has said the goals are aspirational and they need to work with the community to figure out what residents want. This is hardly something to get upset about. No need to get covid cranky over it.

"We cannot be Pollyannaish there will be backlash when we have this discussion," Mueller said. "We have to figure out what the community is willing to accept, and, candidly, we may not be able to get there all the way."

"These goals are aspirational, and they're meant to be aspirational," Councilwoman Betsy Nash said.



2nd Great Depression
Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Jul 19, 2020 at 1:21 pm
2nd Great Depression, Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Jul 19, 2020 at 1:21 pm
4 people like this

> Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, a economic collapse greater than the Great Depression is unfolding.

This is true - the Trump Pandemic Response has been an utter failure, destroying lives and the economy. Instead of shutting down once and crushing the virus, followed with effective testing and tracing like other successful countries. So sad!

Local moves like this, and other components of a GND-style recovery plan will rebuild the economy. Now is the time!


James Caldwell
another community
on Jul 25, 2020 at 6:43 pm
James Caldwell , another community
on Jul 25, 2020 at 6:43 pm
2 people like this

Very inspiring that Menlo Park is taking leadership and setting examples.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.