News

Editorial: Elizabeth Lewis and Cary Wiest for Atherton City Council

Elizabeth Lewis and Cary Wiest. Photos by Magali Gauthier.

Atherton doesn't always have a contested City Council election, but when it does, you can expect things to get lively. This year's race, between incumbents Elizabeth Lewis and Cary Wiest and challengers Christine David and Diana Hawkins-Manuelian, is no different. In neighboring cities, the most contentious issues are the housing crisis, the pandemic and police reform. In Atherton, the pivotal issue of the Nov. 3 election is the Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

The well-regarded fire district, which also serves Menlo Park, East Palo Alto and nearby unincorporated areas, is funded by a fixed percentage of property taxes. Property owners in Atherton contribute more than their less-expensively housed neighbors, a reality that has been roiling town politics for the past few years. The debate over whether Atherton should "detach" from the fire district and contract out for emergency services is still alive and playing out in this City Council race.

As The Almanac opined on this page in March: "The notion that Atherton taxpayers, who own some of the highest-valued property in the entire country, are somehow being abused by having to bear a higher proportion of the cost for emergency services in the wider community is absurd. And sad. It rejects the widely held principles of a just society, and the values that underpin the belief in a common good that ensures that all citizens — rich or poor, and everyone in between — are entitled to equal access to education, medical care and emergency services."

Atherton would be best served by detaching from the expensive studies and pointlessly contentious process of examining its contributions to Menlo Park Fire and instead, work proactively with the district to make the town safer in fires and other emergencies.

That makes it easy to recommend reelecting Lewis, a knowledgeable, productive and reasonable member of the council throughout her four terms. Lewis consistently has spoken out against the process that has soured the town's relationship with the Menlo Park Fire Protection District. We think she's the right person to mend fences with the fire district and provide leadership on other key issues facing the town, including deciding the future of the historic Caltrain station, managing town finances and representing residents on regional housing and traffic concerns.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Almanac Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Recommending incumbent Wiest is a harder choice in light of his history on the fire district issue. He was a key member of the narrow majority that voted for the consultants to parse the town's fiscal contributions to the fire district. And the prospect of getting some new blood on the City Council is tempting. However, Wiest's full-throated support of keeping Atherton in the fire district, and his history as a productive and dedicated member of the council in his previous two terms, tipped the balance in his favor over the more inexperienced challengers. We believe we can take Wiest at his word, and recommend voters reelect him.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Editorial: Elizabeth Lewis and Cary Wiest for Atherton City Council

by / Almanac

Uploaded: Sat, Oct 10, 2020, 7:27 am

Atherton doesn't always have a contested City Council election, but when it does, you can expect things to get lively. This year's race, between incumbents Elizabeth Lewis and Cary Wiest and challengers Christine David and Diana Hawkins-Manuelian, is no different. In neighboring cities, the most contentious issues are the housing crisis, the pandemic and police reform. In Atherton, the pivotal issue of the Nov. 3 election is the Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

The well-regarded fire district, which also serves Menlo Park, East Palo Alto and nearby unincorporated areas, is funded by a fixed percentage of property taxes. Property owners in Atherton contribute more than their less-expensively housed neighbors, a reality that has been roiling town politics for the past few years. The debate over whether Atherton should "detach" from the fire district and contract out for emergency services is still alive and playing out in this City Council race.

As The Almanac opined on this page in March: "The notion that Atherton taxpayers, who own some of the highest-valued property in the entire country, are somehow being abused by having to bear a higher proportion of the cost for emergency services in the wider community is absurd. And sad. It rejects the widely held principles of a just society, and the values that underpin the belief in a common good that ensures that all citizens — rich or poor, and everyone in between — are entitled to equal access to education, medical care and emergency services."

Atherton would be best served by detaching from the expensive studies and pointlessly contentious process of examining its contributions to Menlo Park Fire and instead, work proactively with the district to make the town safer in fires and other emergencies.

That makes it easy to recommend reelecting Lewis, a knowledgeable, productive and reasonable member of the council throughout her four terms. Lewis consistently has spoken out against the process that has soured the town's relationship with the Menlo Park Fire Protection District. We think she's the right person to mend fences with the fire district and provide leadership on other key issues facing the town, including deciding the future of the historic Caltrain station, managing town finances and representing residents on regional housing and traffic concerns.

Recommending incumbent Wiest is a harder choice in light of his history on the fire district issue. He was a key member of the narrow majority that voted for the consultants to parse the town's fiscal contributions to the fire district. And the prospect of getting some new blood on the City Council is tempting. However, Wiest's full-throated support of keeping Atherton in the fire district, and his history as a productive and dedicated member of the council in his previous two terms, tipped the balance in his favor over the more inexperienced challengers. We believe we can take Wiest at his word, and recommend voters reelect him.

Comments

Peter Carpenter
Registered user
Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Oct 11, 2020 at 8:01 am
Peter Carpenter, Menlo Park: Park Forest
Registered user
on Oct 11, 2020 at 8:01 am
14 people like this

"Wiest's full-throated support of keeping Atherton in the fire district,"

If you believe then this I have a bridge to sell you.

This is pure election pandering by Wiest.

I challenge Wiest to post on this Forum a promise to not pursue either detachment from the Fire District or property tax reparations from the Fire District (which would require taking fire services away from East Palo Alto and Menlo Park).

The only way to put this messy issue behind us is to vote Wiest out of office and fortunately we have two much better candidates in David and Hawkins-Manuelian.


Kelly Davis
Registered user
Atherton: West Atherton
on Oct 14, 2020 at 3:42 pm
Kelly Davis, Atherton: West Atherton
Registered user
on Oct 14, 2020 at 3:42 pm
Like this comment

I am in full support of Dr. Diana Hawkins-Manuelian because of her strong push towards environmental policies and concerns. She is smart. She is collaborative. She is an avid researcher and listener.

The top issue that the Almanac editorial board discusses here is the fire district - and yet the ultimate recommendation is to vote for the one person running in this election who has shown any potential support in the past of Atherton leaving the fire district.

Here's the thing: If all four people running for election are in favor of Atherton remaining in the fire district, this shouldn't be our top issue for selecting who we vote for.

I am 26 years old and every vote I make is for my future and for the future of those older and younger than myself. I want to stress here - I have more years to go (hopefully) than any of the candidates. I would like to see council members who are looking at the long term. 

In the national election, state election, and local election - who's future are you voting for?

Fellow Atherton residents, please vote for Dr. Diana Hawkins-Manuelian for Atherton Town Council this election.


Peter Carpenter
Registered user
Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Oct 14, 2020 at 4:20 pm
Peter Carpenter, Menlo Park: Park Forest
Registered user
on Oct 14, 2020 at 4:20 pm
5 people like this

"If all four people running for election are in favor of Atherton remaining in the fire district, this shouldn't be our top issue for selecting who we vote for."

Sadly one of the four continues to push this issue.

I challenge Wiest to post on this Forum a promise to not pursue either detachment from the Fire District or property tax reparations from the Fire District (which would require taking fire services away from East Palo Alto and Menlo Park).

The only way to put this messy issue behind us is to vote Wiest out of office and fortunately we have two much better candidates in David and Hawkins-Manuelian.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.