News

Guest opinion: No on Measure A

For many years, the citizens of Woodside have fought to preserve rural Woodside. In 1988, Measure J was passed to stop the use of residential lots to facilitate commercial expansion. Do we want Woodside to continue to be a delightful rural community without attracting even more traffic, and overwhelming our town? The Woodside general plan requires that businesses primarily serve the day-to-day needs of the local community. How many customers are not local residents? Are we becoming a destination, not a residential community?

Proponents allege that outdoor dining will be eliminated without passage of this measure. Hyperbole like this beguiles folks to supporting Measure A, but nothing could be further from the truth. Both restaurants have had outdoor dining for years and can have more outdoor dining by presenting a plan to the town and Planning Commission.

We all want and enjoy outdoor dining and can continue to enjoy it and work to expand it. Let us work together to develop a comprehensive plan with the town and citizen input and review and determine the best approach with specific details for seating and parking for providing outdoor dining. It is wrong to start with a brute force initiative to remove the limit on commercial expansion for these two areas. By eliminating these protections, there will be no restrictions on bulldozing the open space lot to build a large parking lot and facilitate expansion of the restaurant.

A second completely unrelated plan is to build an amphitheater by Town Hall to provide a venue for commercial events. This idea should also be brought to the town as a developed plan which includes details on size, performance times, number of customers, building cost, and ongoing maintenance rather than charging forward to overrule limitations. In fact, they can gather there today where the proposed amphitheater is, if it is not a commercial event, like a rock concert. So why do we need to allow commercial use in this amphitheater? How will such commercial use impact the local businesses? How will it impact the neighbors?

Neither of these projects has been studied, engineered, planned, or designed to allow for an intelligent vote. Instead, scare tactics have been employed for a reactionary vote.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Almanac Online for as little as $5/month.

Join

Bacchus Management is spending thousands of dollars and using employees to gather signatures, send emails, and reportedly solicit callers who are seeking reservations. It is clear that Bacchus could benefit through expansion and revenue if Measure A passes.

We are the custodians of Woodside, and its future is dependent on your vote. Will you allow the circumvention of the protection of our planning process and allow commercial interests to exploit our beautiful town and in so doing destroy our rural environment? Or will you stand with the many residents who are voting no on Measure A to enable an inclusive conversation for a proper solution to the issues before us? Let's work together to see how we can provide more outdoor dining and gathering places without damaging the rural character of our beautiful town.

I ask you to vote no on this measure.

Don Pugh has been a Woodside resident since 1972 and was the author of Measure J. He can be reached at [email protected] Visit saveruralwoodside.org for more information.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

The Almanac publishes guest opinions, editorials and letters to the editor online and in print. Submit signed op-eds of no more than 750 words or letters to the editor of up to 350 words to [email protected] The weekly print deadline is Tuesday at noon.

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Guest opinion: No on Measure A

by / Almanac

Uploaded: Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:46 am

For many years, the citizens of Woodside have fought to preserve rural Woodside. In 1988, Measure J was passed to stop the use of residential lots to facilitate commercial expansion. Do we want Woodside to continue to be a delightful rural community without attracting even more traffic, and overwhelming our town? The Woodside general plan requires that businesses primarily serve the day-to-day needs of the local community. How many customers are not local residents? Are we becoming a destination, not a residential community?

Proponents allege that outdoor dining will be eliminated without passage of this measure. Hyperbole like this beguiles folks to supporting Measure A, but nothing could be further from the truth. Both restaurants have had outdoor dining for years and can have more outdoor dining by presenting a plan to the town and Planning Commission.

We all want and enjoy outdoor dining and can continue to enjoy it and work to expand it. Let us work together to develop a comprehensive plan with the town and citizen input and review and determine the best approach with specific details for seating and parking for providing outdoor dining. It is wrong to start with a brute force initiative to remove the limit on commercial expansion for these two areas. By eliminating these protections, there will be no restrictions on bulldozing the open space lot to build a large parking lot and facilitate expansion of the restaurant.

A second completely unrelated plan is to build an amphitheater by Town Hall to provide a venue for commercial events. This idea should also be brought to the town as a developed plan which includes details on size, performance times, number of customers, building cost, and ongoing maintenance rather than charging forward to overrule limitations. In fact, they can gather there today where the proposed amphitheater is, if it is not a commercial event, like a rock concert. So why do we need to allow commercial use in this amphitheater? How will such commercial use impact the local businesses? How will it impact the neighbors?

Neither of these projects has been studied, engineered, planned, or designed to allow for an intelligent vote. Instead, scare tactics have been employed for a reactionary vote.

Bacchus Management is spending thousands of dollars and using employees to gather signatures, send emails, and reportedly solicit callers who are seeking reservations. It is clear that Bacchus could benefit through expansion and revenue if Measure A passes.

We are the custodians of Woodside, and its future is dependent on your vote. Will you allow the circumvention of the protection of our planning process and allow commercial interests to exploit our beautiful town and in so doing destroy our rural environment? Or will you stand with the many residents who are voting no on Measure A to enable an inclusive conversation for a proper solution to the issues before us? Let's work together to see how we can provide more outdoor dining and gathering places without damaging the rural character of our beautiful town.

I ask you to vote no on this measure.

Don Pugh has been a Woodside resident since 1972 and was the author of Measure J. He can be reached at [email protected] Visit saveruralwoodside.org for more information.

The Almanac publishes guest opinions, editorials and letters to the editor online and in print. Submit signed op-eds of no more than 750 words or letters to the editor of up to 350 words to [email protected] The weekly print deadline is Tuesday at noon.

Comments

awatkins
Registered user
Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
on Oct 18, 2021 at 12:26 pm
awatkins, Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
Registered user
on Oct 18, 2021 at 12:26 pm

Measure A is a deceptive trick. Read its text in your voter pamphlet and you will see that its only effect is to irrevocably re-zone two residential parcels to commercial.

That simple fact has been wrapped by the proponents in an elaborate story about how it "preserves outdoor dining" and "allows discussion". It does neither. It just sets the stage for further commercialization of Woodside, worse traffic, and more asphalt. Woodside's most consistent and lifelong goal has been to preserve its urban character. Measure A does the opposite.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.