News

Decorated sheriff's deputy sues San Mateo County over workplace sexual harassment, assault

Female SWAT team member in unending campaign to demean, assault and force her to resign, lawsuit claims

A decorated member of the SWAT team is suing over alleged sexual harassment, assault and retaliation by her supervisors in the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

The only woman on the San Mateo County Sheriff's SWAT team, Deputy Carryn Barker who leads the sex crimes unit, has filed a lawsuit in San Mateo County Superior Court alleging she was repeatedly sexually harassed by her male supervisors and denied accommodation to care for her ailing mother.

The lawsuit, which was filed on Nov. 9, includes allegations of demeaning verbal treatment, retaliation, failure by the department to prevent harassment and an outright sexual assault when her supervisor allegedly tackling her to the ground, pinning her and grabbing her inappropriately in front of her male colleagues.

Barker's lawsuit alleges a harrowing display of abuse by her superiors that caused her so much emotional distress she ended up in a hospital emergency room with a stress migraine. It temporarily blinded her, according to the lawsuit.

County attorneys for the Sheriff's Office could not immediately be reached for comment.

A decorated sheriff's deputy with six years of experience, Barker has received multiple awards for her service, including the Medal of Honor, which is the highest honor awarded within law enforcement for extreme bravery, courage and devotion to duty. She leads the sex crimes unit. She is the only woman on the San Mateo County SWAT team and the only female detective in her unit. One lieutenant referred to her as a “rockstar,” according to the lawsuit.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

But despite her accomplishments, Barker allegedly faced a "boys’ club" within the department, "where sexism and corruption exist throughout the organization. High-ranking men who work at SMCSO openly engage in sexist behavior at work with encouragement from other senior men at SMCSO, none of whom face any meaningful repercussion," the lawsuit claims.

"The Sheriff's Office boys’ club not only covers up the bad behavior of its harassers and assailants, but it also elevates them to even higher positions of authority," according to the lawsuit.

The legal complaint alleges multiple instances in which men in positions of power within the Sheriff's Office openly viewed pornography, made sexual and demeaning remarks and harassed multiple female employees. In at least one case, the continuous harassment led one female employee to quit her job.

Barker, too, faced escalating harassment starting in 2018 after she joined the SWAT team, which is composed of an elite group of deputies assigned to incidents requiring advanced skills.

According to the lawsuit, Sgt. Andre Moniot allegedly directed sexual remarks and wisecracks at Barker to the extent that other deputies joked about what kind of comments he had made each day. Yet, supervisors didn't do anything to address the sexual harassment despite complaints made by Barker and another deputy.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

In August 2021, Moniot’s sexual harassment allegedly escalated to sexually assaulting Barker in front of their colleagues during a gathering of the SWAT team. Moniot allegedly made a rude comment to Barker, who responded that she didn't appreciate the comment. Moniot then allegedly grabbed Barker, wrestled her to the ground and pinned her in front of their colleagues. He also allegedly grabbed her anatomy inappropriately during the incident.

At least one member of the SWAT team submitted a written statement confirming that Moniot touched Barker inappropriately, but no one intervened and Moniot was never punished, according to the lawsuit.

Other male supervisors allegedly began a campaign to get Barker to resign. They assigned her large volumes of work and insisted that she complete the work in unreasonably short timeframes. They told her to “suck it up” when she asked for additional support for the sex crimes unit, according to the complaint.

The supervisors also knew that Barker, who is a single mother, was caring for her 2-year-old son and her disabled mother and needed "flex time." They refused to grant her the time while they allowed male detectives to take flex time without comment, according to the lawsuit.

The supervisors also allegedly interfered with Barker's ability to use her Family Medical Leave Act rights to care for her mother, who has Parkinson's disease. They allegedly retaliated against her by falsely accusing her of fraud on her work time and required her to send daily text messages informing them when she would be leaving and arriving at work, according to the lawsuit.

Barker's complaints were ignored, delayed or brushed off by her human resources caseworker, the lawsuit claims. In all, she had filed four complaints about the harassment, but she still faced daily retaliation. None of the men involved in these behaviors were punished or reprimanded.

Although Barker was forced to make three interviews with internal affairs investigators, in November 2022, more than a year after the assault by Moniot, she learned he would not be placed on administrative leave for his alleged sexual assault and harassment. Multiple officers said they witnessed the behavior, according to the lawsuit.

Barker received a letter approving her right to sue from the California Civil Rights Department under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act on Nov. 8. Barker previously filed administrative complaints with the state Department of Fair Employment and Housing, a prerequisite that found she had probable cause to file a lawsuit.

The next day, Barker filed the lawsuit against the county for: a hostile work environment, harassment based on sex; discrimination based on sex; retaliation; failure to prevent harassment; and failure to accommodate in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act. The suit asks for unspecified damages in excess of $25,000.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Sue Dremann
 
Sue Dremann is a veteran journalist who joined the Palo Alto Weekly in 2001. She is a breaking news and general assignment reporter who also covers the regional environmental, health and crime beats. Read more >>

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important law enforcement news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Decorated sheriff's deputy sues San Mateo County over workplace sexual harassment, assault

Female SWAT team member in unending campaign to demean, assault and force her to resign, lawsuit claims

by / Almanac

Uploaded: Fri, Nov 11, 2022, 5:32 pm

The only woman on the San Mateo County Sheriff's SWAT team, Deputy Carryn Barker who leads the sex crimes unit, has filed a lawsuit in San Mateo County Superior Court alleging she was repeatedly sexually harassed by her male supervisors and denied accommodation to care for her ailing mother.

The lawsuit, which was filed on Nov. 9, includes allegations of demeaning verbal treatment, retaliation, failure by the department to prevent harassment and an outright sexual assault when her supervisor allegedly tackling her to the ground, pinning her and grabbing her inappropriately in front of her male colleagues.

Barker's lawsuit alleges a harrowing display of abuse by her superiors that caused her so much emotional distress she ended up in a hospital emergency room with a stress migraine. It temporarily blinded her, according to the lawsuit.

County attorneys for the Sheriff's Office could not immediately be reached for comment.

A decorated sheriff's deputy with six years of experience, Barker has received multiple awards for her service, including the Medal of Honor, which is the highest honor awarded within law enforcement for extreme bravery, courage and devotion to duty. She leads the sex crimes unit. She is the only woman on the San Mateo County SWAT team and the only female detective in her unit. One lieutenant referred to her as a “rockstar,” according to the lawsuit.

But despite her accomplishments, Barker allegedly faced a "boys’ club" within the department, "where sexism and corruption exist throughout the organization. High-ranking men who work at SMCSO openly engage in sexist behavior at work with encouragement from other senior men at SMCSO, none of whom face any meaningful repercussion," the lawsuit claims.

"The Sheriff's Office boys’ club not only covers up the bad behavior of its harassers and assailants, but it also elevates them to even higher positions of authority," according to the lawsuit.

The legal complaint alleges multiple instances in which men in positions of power within the Sheriff's Office openly viewed pornography, made sexual and demeaning remarks and harassed multiple female employees. In at least one case, the continuous harassment led one female employee to quit her job.

Barker, too, faced escalating harassment starting in 2018 after she joined the SWAT team, which is composed of an elite group of deputies assigned to incidents requiring advanced skills.

According to the lawsuit, Sgt. Andre Moniot allegedly directed sexual remarks and wisecracks at Barker to the extent that other deputies joked about what kind of comments he had made each day. Yet, supervisors didn't do anything to address the sexual harassment despite complaints made by Barker and another deputy.

In August 2021, Moniot’s sexual harassment allegedly escalated to sexually assaulting Barker in front of their colleagues during a gathering of the SWAT team. Moniot allegedly made a rude comment to Barker, who responded that she didn't appreciate the comment. Moniot then allegedly grabbed Barker, wrestled her to the ground and pinned her in front of their colleagues. He also allegedly grabbed her anatomy inappropriately during the incident.

At least one member of the SWAT team submitted a written statement confirming that Moniot touched Barker inappropriately, but no one intervened and Moniot was never punished, according to the lawsuit.

Other male supervisors allegedly began a campaign to get Barker to resign. They assigned her large volumes of work and insisted that she complete the work in unreasonably short timeframes. They told her to “suck it up” when she asked for additional support for the sex crimes unit, according to the complaint.

The supervisors also knew that Barker, who is a single mother, was caring for her 2-year-old son and her disabled mother and needed "flex time." They refused to grant her the time while they allowed male detectives to take flex time without comment, according to the lawsuit.

The supervisors also allegedly interfered with Barker's ability to use her Family Medical Leave Act rights to care for her mother, who has Parkinson's disease. They allegedly retaliated against her by falsely accusing her of fraud on her work time and required her to send daily text messages informing them when she would be leaving and arriving at work, according to the lawsuit.

Barker's complaints were ignored, delayed or brushed off by her human resources caseworker, the lawsuit claims. In all, she had filed four complaints about the harassment, but she still faced daily retaliation. None of the men involved in these behaviors were punished or reprimanded.

Although Barker was forced to make three interviews with internal affairs investigators, in November 2022, more than a year after the assault by Moniot, she learned he would not be placed on administrative leave for his alleged sexual assault and harassment. Multiple officers said they witnessed the behavior, according to the lawsuit.

Barker received a letter approving her right to sue from the California Civil Rights Department under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act on Nov. 8. Barker previously filed administrative complaints with the state Department of Fair Employment and Housing, a prerequisite that found she had probable cause to file a lawsuit.

The next day, Barker filed the lawsuit against the county for: a hostile work environment, harassment based on sex; discrimination based on sex; retaliation; failure to prevent harassment; and failure to accommodate in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act. The suit asks for unspecified damages in excess of $25,000.

Comments

Dave Boyce
Registered user
Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Nov 13, 2022 at 6:36 pm
Dave Boyce, Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
Registered user
on Nov 13, 2022 at 6:36 pm

This report is not surprising. It is disappointing and it does point directly at Sheriff’s Office management for creating an atmosphere that does not condemn any hint of such behavior.

A “new broom” is on deck for taking on this management challenge and she should address this villainy in no uncertain terms. The era of Munks and Bolanos can’t end quickly enough.


Menlo Voter.
Registered user
Menlo Park: other
on Nov 14, 2022 at 7:21 am
Menlo Voter., Menlo Park: other
Registered user
on Nov 14, 2022 at 7:21 am

With the likes of Munks and Bolanos, the notorious visitors of a house of prostitution, leading the department this was a completely predictable result.


susannahID
Registered user
Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Nov 14, 2022 at 12:31 pm
susannahID, Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
Registered user
on Nov 14, 2022 at 12:31 pm

It is not OK that our taxes pay the salaries of people who treat their colleagues with such unkindness.


Nanc
Registered user
Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Nov 14, 2022 at 12:50 pm
Nanc, Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
Registered user
on Nov 14, 2022 at 12:50 pm

Why is she suing for only $25,000 and why is the DA not prosecuting for sexual assault?! Seems like this case should be worth $25 million for a ruined career and emotional distress.


pearl
Registered user
another community
on Nov 14, 2022 at 1:24 pm
pearl, another community
Registered user
on Nov 14, 2022 at 1:24 pm

I am a former San Mateo County Sheriff's Office employee. How embarrassing that Sgt. Minoit and his boys are a part of the organization. They only give it a bad name. Hopefully, Minoit and other Deputies like him will be kicked out of the organization! Maybe there's hope what with the new lady Sheriff coming into office


Dave Ross
Registered user
Portola Valley: Brookside Park
on Nov 23, 2022 at 12:21 pm
Dave Ross, Portola Valley: Brookside Park
Registered user
on Nov 23, 2022 at 12:21 pm

@Nanc - the $25,000 amount is simply a category for the type of complaint being filed. Lawsuits seeking damages under $25K are handled differently, so this is just a way to notify the court that the damages demanded will be above that amount. I expect that as the case progresses, the amount sought wil be much higher: "... unspecified damages in excess of $25,000."

This "boy's club" behavior is inexcusable. I (and many others) voted for Sheriff-elect Christina Corpus in hopes of breaking up this internal culture.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.