News

Sequoia district didn't know of ex-superintendent's involvement in LA overtime-pay scandal

Allegations surfaced regarding more than $78,000 in improperly authorized payments to Darnise Williams while at Los Angeles Unified School District

Darnise Williams in 2022 stepped down as superintendent of Sequoia Union High School District. Photo by Leah Worthington.

Darnise Williams, Sequoia Union High School District's former superintendent, was implicated in a pay scandal in the Los Angeles Unified School District prior to being hired by Sequoia, a recent Los Angeles Times story has revealed.

Williams, a popular superintendent who left her position at Sequoia less than two years into her three-year contract under undisclosed circumstances, was one of a number of Los Angeles school district employees who allegedly took thousands of dollars in overtime pay that wasn't properly authorized, according to court and district documents obtained by the LA Times.

At the time, Williams worked for the Los Angeles school district in then-Superintendent Austin Beutner's cabinet as senior director, a position she held for a year. Prior to her cabinet position, she was administrator of instruction in LAUSD's Local District West. She was demoted for her part in the scandal in July 2020 after filing for and receiving three years' worth of extra pay totaling $78,051.

In all, a handful of upper-tier staff collected $750,000 during a three-year period starting in 2017. Overtime pay above salaries is granted in the LA school district only in rare, emergency situations, according to administrators cited in the LA Times story. Staff who submitted for the pay didn't follow district rules when applying for overtime compensation and did so repeatedly. Other administrators then improperly approved the pay, according to the LA Times.

"The extra pay coincided with the run-up to the teachers’ strike of January 2019, when district officials stressed that the school system was operating as efficiently as it could and struggling to provide basic services to students — leaving it unable to afford raises sought by teachers and low-paid nonteaching staff," the article noted.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

The scandal came to light in court documents filed by a former employee who was suing for harassment.

In an email on Sept. 28, a Los Angeles Unified spokesperson said: "In 2020 and under a former superintendent, the District was made aware of allegations of potential violations of district policy related to additional work compensation. After a full investigation, it was determined there were no violations of law, and the District took the necessary steps and approach. Given the gravity of these allegations and the responsibility to ensure all guidelines and procedures are adhered to, this administration is conducting a full review and reserves the right to take appropriate action as necessary."

The emailed statement added that all personnel matters are private and confidential, so district officials cannot comment on why an employee transitioned to other positions within Los Angeles Unified.

Williams did not respond to requests for comment.

Sequoia Union High School District said in a statement that the district was not aware of any of the claims referenced in the Los Angeles Times article during Dr. Williams' hiring process and that it is not conducting an investigation at this time.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

"As Superintendent, Dr. Williams was only entitled to pay as per the terms of her contract. Dr. Williams' contract did not include overtime pay. All purchases and reimbursements made by the Superintendent's office were reconciled according to District procedure," Sequoia Union said.

Williams's departure in mid-December 2022 from Sequoia set off a firestorm in the school community. She was the district's first Black female superintendent, a hire that was widely lauded by the community. Many felt she was pushed out by the board, which said the decision was by mutual agreement. Others decried the decision as racist.

Details were never revealed as to why Williams resigned. She was subsequently hired as superintendent by the Pacifica School District and began there on July 1.

Pacifica School Board President Lynda Brocchini, in an email on Thursday, Sept. 28, said that the board underwent an extensive background check of Williams prior to hiring her, which included conversations with her previous employers. "I can confirm that LA Unified was one of those districts," she said.

"After those conversations, the Board of Trustees was satisfied with the results of the vetting process and determined that Dr. Williams was the best candidate to serve as the superintendent of the Pacifica School District," said Brocchini.

Looking for more Redwood City stories? The RWC Pulse will be your new source of vital news and information. Sign up to be among the first to get our daily local news headlines sent to your inbox for free.

Sue Dremann
 
Sue Dremann is a veteran journalist who joined the Palo Alto Weekly in 2001. She is a breaking news and general assignment reporter who also covers the regional environmental, health and crime beats. Read more >>

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local education news. Become a member today.

Sequoia district didn't know of ex-superintendent's involvement in LA overtime-pay scandal

Allegations surfaced regarding more than $78,000 in improperly authorized payments to Darnise Williams while at Los Angeles Unified School District

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Thu, Sep 28, 2023, 4:29 pm

Darnise Williams, Sequoia Union High School District's former superintendent, was implicated in a pay scandal in the Los Angeles Unified School District prior to being hired by Sequoia, a recent Los Angeles Times story has revealed.

Williams, a popular superintendent who left her position at Sequoia less than two years into her three-year contract under undisclosed circumstances, was one of a number of Los Angeles school district employees who allegedly took thousands of dollars in overtime pay that wasn't properly authorized, according to court and district documents obtained by the LA Times.

At the time, Williams worked for the Los Angeles school district in then-Superintendent Austin Beutner's cabinet as senior director, a position she held for a year. Prior to her cabinet position, she was administrator of instruction in LAUSD's Local District West. She was demoted for her part in the scandal in July 2020 after filing for and receiving three years' worth of extra pay totaling $78,051.

In all, a handful of upper-tier staff collected $750,000 during a three-year period starting in 2017. Overtime pay above salaries is granted in the LA school district only in rare, emergency situations, according to administrators cited in the LA Times story. Staff who submitted for the pay didn't follow district rules when applying for overtime compensation and did so repeatedly. Other administrators then improperly approved the pay, according to the LA Times.

"The extra pay coincided with the run-up to the teachers’ strike of January 2019, when district officials stressed that the school system was operating as efficiently as it could and struggling to provide basic services to students — leaving it unable to afford raises sought by teachers and low-paid nonteaching staff," the article noted.

The scandal came to light in court documents filed by a former employee who was suing for harassment.

In an email on Sept. 28, a Los Angeles Unified spokesperson said: "In 2020 and under a former superintendent, the District was made aware of allegations of potential violations of district policy related to additional work compensation. After a full investigation, it was determined there were no violations of law, and the District took the necessary steps and approach. Given the gravity of these allegations and the responsibility to ensure all guidelines and procedures are adhered to, this administration is conducting a full review and reserves the right to take appropriate action as necessary."

The emailed statement added that all personnel matters are private and confidential, so district officials cannot comment on why an employee transitioned to other positions within Los Angeles Unified.

Williams did not respond to requests for comment.

Sequoia Union High School District said in a statement that the district was not aware of any of the claims referenced in the Los Angeles Times article during Dr. Williams' hiring process and that it is not conducting an investigation at this time.

"As Superintendent, Dr. Williams was only entitled to pay as per the terms of her contract. Dr. Williams' contract did not include overtime pay. All purchases and reimbursements made by the Superintendent's office were reconciled according to District procedure," Sequoia Union said.

Williams's departure in mid-December 2022 from Sequoia set off a firestorm in the school community. She was the district's first Black female superintendent, a hire that was widely lauded by the community. Many felt she was pushed out by the board, which said the decision was by mutual agreement. Others decried the decision as racist.

Details were never revealed as to why Williams resigned. She was subsequently hired as superintendent by the Pacifica School District and began there on July 1.

Pacifica School Board President Lynda Brocchini, in an email on Thursday, Sept. 28, said that the board underwent an extensive background check of Williams prior to hiring her, which included conversations with her previous employers. "I can confirm that LA Unified was one of those districts," she said.

"After those conversations, the Board of Trustees was satisfied with the results of the vetting process and determined that Dr. Williams was the best candidate to serve as the superintendent of the Pacifica School District," said Brocchini.

Comments

Les
Registered user
Woodside School
on Sep 29, 2023 at 12:36 pm
Les, Woodside School
Registered user
on Sep 29, 2023 at 12:36 pm

These people just float from one taxpayer-provided position to the next, lipping past and avoiding the consequences of the consequences of their actions, all the while geared up to take lifetime pension benefits at taxperer expense. Trust your elected Board. They did the right thing.


pogo
Registered user
Woodside: other
on Oct 1, 2023 at 5:36 am
pogo, Woodside: other
Registered user
on Oct 1, 2023 at 5:36 am

The most amazing part of this story is how Pacifica School District officials say it’s no problem. I’m sure those same officials will scream how shocked they are when their new Superintendent scams them.


Menlo Voter.
Registered user
Menlo Park: other
on Oct 2, 2023 at 7:33 am
Menlo Voter., Menlo Park: other
Registered user
on Oct 2, 2023 at 7:33 am

In the private sector background checks are done on positions at this level. In education, teachers have background checks. The district didn't do a background check on this person and discover this information? Really? If they didn't, they were derelict in their duty and that should be kept in mind at the next school board election. If they knew and hired her anyway, that's just malfeasance and those responsible should be dismissed.


Karl
Registered user
Portola Valley: Westridge
on Oct 3, 2023 at 11:50 am
Karl, Portola Valley: Westridge
Registered user
on Oct 3, 2023 at 11:50 am

The color and gender matched. Enough said.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.