News

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors disagreement about leadership rotation policy boils over

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors grappled with how to handle its rotation of leadership positions. Photo by Lloyd Lee.

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors narrowly voted to delay adopting a policy for the rotation of leadership posts on the board after a debate Tuesday, Nov. 14, that grew contentious at times.

The current, informal policy has seen the five-member board elect the vice president to be the new board president and place the outgoing president at the back of the rotation. The longest-serving board member would then become the vice president, with newly elected members waiting to rotate in.

But if two or more new members are elected at the same time, as was the case this past year, it could prevent one of them from serving in leadership if they only serve one four-year term.

That would mean that if the new policy was adopted, Supervisors Noelia Corzo and Ray Mueller, both elected in 2022, would draw straws in January to determine who becomes fourth in line, which could prevent that person from getting a turn serving as board president if they aren't reelected.

Mueller suggested adopting a style similar to what he said he experienced as a city council member in Menlo Park, which had newly elected members quickly escalated to the vice president role.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Supervisors David Canepa and Warren Slocum said they supported the policy being proposed Tuesday as one that took politics out of the process, but Slocum's comments drew a rebuke from Mueller.

"I think Mr. Canepa's right when he talks about taking the politics out of it, we've already seen it here this morning with Mr. Mueller," Slocum said, before he was cut off.

"I take offense to that, Mr. Slocum," Mueller said, arguing that he was making a policy suggestion, not a political one.

"Thank you for your opinion, appreciate it," said Slocum sarcastically.

Shortly after the exchange, Mueller said he was done with the side comments that he felt were directed at him.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

"I have to say, in my time on this board I've taken quite a bit of disparagement," said Mueller, who objected to accusations of caring more about ambition, or the politics of the decision, rather than the policy.

"And I'm going to start telling my colleagues, I'm not going to take disparagement like that anymore. I'm not going to take side comments. I don't do that to you, so please don't do it to me," he said.

Corzo likewise said she disagreed with a policy that could potentially make the board's first member who is a woman of color ineligible to serve as president in her first term.

Canepa was undeterred and offered the motion to approve the rotation policy anyway, saying he hoped "that collegiality and sanity prevail, and not one's ambitions."

"There's no need for disparagement like that, Supervisor Canepa," said Mueller.

"Let's all stay focused on the issues," said Supervisor Dave Pine.

Pine offered a replacement motion to work with Mueller to create an alternative policy that could be considered at a later meeting, which was agreed to by a vote of 3-2, thus delaying the implementation of any formal policy for now.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local political news. Become a member today.

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors disagreement about leadership rotation policy boils over

by Thomas Hughes / Bay City News Service

Uploaded: Mon, Nov 20, 2023, 8:11 am

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors narrowly voted to delay adopting a policy for the rotation of leadership posts on the board after a debate Tuesday, Nov. 14, that grew contentious at times.

The current, informal policy has seen the five-member board elect the vice president to be the new board president and place the outgoing president at the back of the rotation. The longest-serving board member would then become the vice president, with newly elected members waiting to rotate in.

But if two or more new members are elected at the same time, as was the case this past year, it could prevent one of them from serving in leadership if they only serve one four-year term.

That would mean that if the new policy was adopted, Supervisors Noelia Corzo and Ray Mueller, both elected in 2022, would draw straws in January to determine who becomes fourth in line, which could prevent that person from getting a turn serving as board president if they aren't reelected.

Mueller suggested adopting a style similar to what he said he experienced as a city council member in Menlo Park, which had newly elected members quickly escalated to the vice president role.

Supervisors David Canepa and Warren Slocum said they supported the policy being proposed Tuesday as one that took politics out of the process, but Slocum's comments drew a rebuke from Mueller.

"I think Mr. Canepa's right when he talks about taking the politics out of it, we've already seen it here this morning with Mr. Mueller," Slocum said, before he was cut off.

"I take offense to that, Mr. Slocum," Mueller said, arguing that he was making a policy suggestion, not a political one.

"Thank you for your opinion, appreciate it," said Slocum sarcastically.

Shortly after the exchange, Mueller said he was done with the side comments that he felt were directed at him.

"I have to say, in my time on this board I've taken quite a bit of disparagement," said Mueller, who objected to accusations of caring more about ambition, or the politics of the decision, rather than the policy.

"And I'm going to start telling my colleagues, I'm not going to take disparagement like that anymore. I'm not going to take side comments. I don't do that to you, so please don't do it to me," he said.

Corzo likewise said she disagreed with a policy that could potentially make the board's first member who is a woman of color ineligible to serve as president in her first term.

Canepa was undeterred and offered the motion to approve the rotation policy anyway, saying he hoped "that collegiality and sanity prevail, and not one's ambitions."

"There's no need for disparagement like that, Supervisor Canepa," said Mueller.

"Let's all stay focused on the issues," said Supervisor Dave Pine.

Pine offered a replacement motion to work with Mueller to create an alternative policy that could be considered at a later meeting, which was agreed to by a vote of 3-2, thus delaying the implementation of any formal policy for now.

Comments

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.