Atherton targets unfunded liability with surplus funds | September 25, 2013 | Almanac | Almanac Online |


News - September 25, 2013

Atherton targets unfunded liability with surplus funds

by Renee Batti

Atherton's unfunded liability debt will be $2 million lighter with the City Council's decision to apply that portion of the town's $4.9 million surplus toward employee retirement obligations.

The council on Sept. 18 chose the high side of City Manager George Rodericks' recommendation to allocate between $1.1 million and $2 million to whittle down the liabilty, which represents the cost of health benefits provided to retirees. The large surplus, Mr. Rodericks wrote in his staff report, is a result of three years of efforts by the town to restructure its operations and "right-size its structural deficit situation."

Now, he wrote, "the town is in the rare and enviable position of meeting its mandatory reserve requirements and still maintaining a surplus in the unallocated general fund balance." The mandatory reserves include 15 percent of the town's operational budget for emergency funds and 20 percent for operational spending.

A healthy increase in property tax revenue in the last two years — a 9 percent rise both years — after several years of near stagnation also contributed to the surplus.

"Buying down the long-term liability is money in our pocket," said Councilman Jim Dobbie. "The sooner we can pay it down the better." The sentiment was echoed by the other council members, and the vote was unanimous.

The town has managed to pay down its liability for pension costs, although there's still some concern about additional costs resulting from overly optimistic investment predictions by CalPERS, the state's public employee retirement agency.

"There remains debate about the viability of CalPERS' investment rates of return and any adjustments in the assumptions," Mr. Rodericks told the Almanac. Any adjustments in the assumption will have a direct impact on the town's contribution requirements, he said.

The robust surplus is prompting talk by some council members and members of the town's finance committee that full assessment of the town's parcel tax may not be necessary.

The council put a parcel tax renewal measure on the November ballot, but the tax language allows the council to reduce the amount assessed — or even suspend the assessment — if it determines the additional revenue isn't needed for the following fiscal year.

Most Atherton homeowners pay $750 annually in parcel taxes. The tax expires at the end of next June.


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


One more week to vote!

Don't forget to cast your Readers' Choice ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of The Almanac.