All four City Council members (a fifth will be elected Nov. 5) have endorsed the tax. Although they submitted their arguments too late to be included in the voter guide, a small group of parcel tax opponents, including former City Council member Kathy McKeithen, has surfaced. Although some may have other reasons, the core goal of this effort is to force a discussion of outsourcing the police department. In addition, they say the city has plenty of revenue and can easily get by without the tax.
In our view, there is no reason not to pass the tax, which can be adjusted by the council every year, from zero to the entire amount. But today's budget surplus in Atherton may be gone next year, and if there is no parcel tax, the town will have to cover all police costs and whatever public works are planned out of the general fund.
And even if the town has signed a favorable labor agreement with the Atherton Police Officers' Association, which will save about 5 percent or more over last year, it still makes sense to approve the parcel tax. We doubt if the $750 annual levy will create a significant hardship for any resident, and the council can certainly cut back the assessment anytime it wants. We urge Atherton residents to approve the parcel tax on Nov. 5.
This story contains 341 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.