Portola Valley: Vineyard gets green light; five-year quest may end | November 27, 2013 | Almanac | Almanac Online |


News - November 27, 2013

Portola Valley: Vineyard gets green light; five-year quest may end

by Dave Boyce

On a 3-2 vote, the Portola Valley Planning Commission granted an application from residents Dr. Kirk Neely and Holly Myers to grow grapes in a field they own at 555 Portola Road in Portola Valley. If no one appeals the Nov. 20 decision to the Town Council, it ends the couple's five-year quest to amend their use permit to allow a vineyard of not more than 5.5 acres in a relatively secluded section of this 17-acre field.

Why a proposed use for private property required five years of meetings is testament to the field's high community status as a "meadow preserve," as the town's general plan calls it. The field is planted in grasses and currently indistinguishable from seven adjoining acres of open space owned by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. When viewed from Portola Road, it appears to be an extension of the Windy Hill Open Space Preserve that rises spectacularly behind it.

The general plan calls the field "visually important to the entire quality of the valley. This preserve should be kept in a natural condition and the existing agricultural character preserved." The meaning of that passage has been central to the controversy as to what can and cannot be done there.

Now there are answers. As to what cannot be done: The boundary with the open-space district is to be unmarked by fences or lines of vegetation, said Commissioner Nate McKitterick in an interview. Furthermore, the most visible acres adjacent to that border must be kept in hay or grass.

As to what can be done: small-scale farming of fruits and vegetables in areas not so easily visible from Portola Road. Fences to protect the crops and a barn-like storage building to store hay are also allowed.

In keeping with their long-held opposition to the vineyard, Commissioners Denise Gilbert and Alexandra Von Feldt dissented from the majority opinion of Arthur "Chip" McIntosh, Nicholas Targ and Mr. McKitterick.

"I interpret general plan language literally," Ms. Gilbert told the Almanac. "Any dictionary you look in, meadows are grass fields and hay."

Mr. McKitterick and Mr. Targ communicated by email.

"Reasonable minds could and did differ on appropriate action," Mr. McKitterick wrote. "My vote was guided by staff's interpretation of the general plan and the limitations the application places on the activities in the meadow."

"The town's decision-making process has been rigorous," said Mr. Targ. "The result is a well defined, ecologically sensitive project that preserves the lands' natural and agricultural character."


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Meet the winners!

The results are in. Check out The Almanac readers' favorite foods, services and fun stuff in the area.

View Winners