Menlo Park recreation classes: nonresident surcharge debated | May 14, 2014 | Almanac | Almanac Online |


News - May 14, 2014

Menlo Park recreation classes: nonresident surcharge debated

by Sandy Brundage

Should nonresidents pay 35 percent more, and wait a week longer to register, for the city of Menlo Park's recreation classes? As a prelude to the Parks and Recreation Commission's consideration of the issue later this year, council members set aside some time on May 6 to provide their perspectives, as did several community members.

The 35 percent surcharge has been in place for about 10 years. Residents already pay $14 per $100,000 of assessed property value each year as part of Measure T, a bond measure passed to support Menlo Park's recreation programs and facilities, Community Services Director Cherise Brandell explained during the May 6 council meeting. How that stacks up against the nonresident surcharge will be researched before the commission meeting takes place this fall.

Six people, some of whom live within the 94025 Menlo Park zip code but outside city limits, told the council the surcharge is an unfair expense for families, as is the one-week registration delay.

Dawn Irvine said her son competes on the gymnastics team for the city of Menlo Park, not the unincorporated county. Five out of the six team members live outside city limits. "I don't think the impact of fees on a team was considered," she said, adding that her family spent about $3,200 just on gymnastics classes — which doesn't include private lessons or meet fees — and that was about $730 more than a family living in Menlo Park.

"You've caused people to step away from the programs," Ms. Irvine said.

As for the registration delay, Ms. Irvine and other parents told the council that their children, who go to Menlo Park schools, would like to attend recreation classes with their friends from school, but often find popular programs like gymnastics full once their one-week waiting period expires.

Martial arts instructor Kristin Quintana of Kuk Sool Won talked about the impact the fees have on her business. With 93 students currently, her classes are at only 58 percent of capacity, she said. "I lost 45 students who said they didn't want to pay the nonresident rate." But after getting the city to agree to let her pay half the surcharge, effectively lowering it to 17 percent for her students, "in five weeks, I had four students decide to stay ... and five students returned to the program after several years away."

Exacerbating the problem, Ms. Quintana said, is that the surcharge doesn't apply to every program in the same way. Some instructors don't charge nonresidents more, and some charge less than 35 percent. "(That) asks my students to subsidize other programs."

Councilman Peter Ohtaki, who owns property in unincorporated Menlo Park, said he supports a higher fee for nonresidents to make up for the Measure T taxes residents are paying, but encouraged the city to see whether 35 percent is more than other cities charge. He also proposed looking at a "membership program" that would allow nonresidents paying an annual fee the same registration priority as residents.

Perhaps those living within unincorporated portions of Menlo Park should explore annexation to become part of the city, Councilwoman Kirsten Keith suggested. She noted that she would have a very difficult time telling a resident that he or she couldn't get into a class because of a nonresident.

Vice Mayor Catherine Carlton said her daughter spent months on the waiting list for gymnastics, so long that she'd nearly lost interest by the time an opening was available.

Councilman Rich Cline and Mayor Ray Mueller want data. Lots of data: which classes are full; what proportion of students come from unincorporated areas; which programs serve mainly the city and which, such as soccer leagues, are more regional; and so on.

The mayor said he was also very interested in exploring a membership program, along with sliding surcharges for classes that aren't full. It "makes no sense to me" to charge the full 35 percent for empty classes, Mr. Mueller said.


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Readers' Choice ballot is here

It’s time to decide what local business is worthy of the title “Almanac Readers' Choice” — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of The Almanac.