Former and current city officials square off over Measure M | August 20, 2014 | Almanac | Almanac Online |


News - August 20, 2014

Former and current city officials square off over Measure M

by Sandy Brundage

The arguments that have been filling the air at city meetings for months are now officially on the Nov. 4 ballot. Those for and against "Measure M," an initiative to change Menlo Park's downtown/El Camino Real specific plan, have submitted the primary arguments in support of their positions.

The argument in favor of the initiative, which was put forward by grassroots coalition Save Menlo, is signed by former council members Steve Schmidt and Heyward Robinson; Planning Commissioner Vince Bressler and former commissioner Patti Fry; and Clark Kepler, former owner of Kepler's Books and president of the Hometown Peninsula Independent Business Alliance.

"A YES vote on Measure M leads to a balanced mix of shops, services, restaurants, residences, offices, and open space. A NO vote leads to mega-office buildings in the heart of downtown, heavier rush-hour traffic, and more commuters cutting through our neighborhoods," the pro-initiative argument claims.

Weighing in against the initiative are Mayor Ray Mueller, Planning Commissioner Ben Eiref, Transportation Commissioner Bianca Walser, Chamber of Commerce CEO Fran Dehn, and Menlo Park City School District board member Maria Hilton.

"We strongly urge No on Measure M. Measure M creates negative impacts to Menlo Park's Downtown revitalization, handcuffs the City with unworkable, inflexible rules for 30 years and damages the city, schools', and fire district finances. Additional negative, unintended consequences also happen," says the argument against the initiative.

Measure M would restrict the amount of office space in any individual development within the specific plan area to 100,000 square feet; limit total new office space to 240,820 square feet; and cap overall new, non-residential development to 474,000 square feet.

It would also redefine open space to mean only areas no higher than 4 feet off the ground, thereby preventing balconies and rooftop areas from counting as open space.

If passed, the measure would require a city-wide vote to make changes to its regulations as well as to approve projects that would exceed the non-residential development caps.

Go to to review the complete text of Measure M, as well as the ballot arguments and other related documents, on the city's website.

Rebuttals to the primary arguments must be turned in to the city clerk's office by noon on Aug. 25.


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Meet the winners!

The results are in. Check out The Almanac readers' favorite foods, services and fun stuff in the area.

View Winners