City Council considers commercial moratorium to reassess rules, policies | June 12, 2019 | Almanac | Almanac Online |


News - June 12, 2019

City Council considers commercial moratorium to reassess rules, policies

by Kate Bradshaw

The Menlo Park City Council is scheduled to consider on June 11 adopting a moratorium on new nonresidential development, as well as on large-scale housing development on the city's Bay side.

After receiving a written request from Vice Mayor Cecilia Taylor and council member Betsy Nash to discuss freezing commercial development, Menlo Park Mayor Ray Mueller scheduled the special council meeting to discuss the matter.

The meeting took place after The Almanac's press time. Go to for an update on the meeting.

"It is my expectation that the request for (a) moratorium will evoke passionate feelings and strong debate on all sides of the issue both within and outside our city borders," Mueller said.

Nash told The Almanac: "Menlo Park's jobs/housing imbalance seriously affects the quality of life for residents throughout the city. A temporary development moratorium gives us a chance to pause and assess our situation and possible policy responses."

While the city has development caps in some areas of the city, she wrote, "now we need to examine how much development has already been built or is in the pipeline, the traffic and other impacts of that development, and make good decisions about mitigating the impacts of development going forward."

In a memo Taylor and Nash submitted to Mueller, City Manager Starla Jerome-Robinson and City Attorney Bill McClure, they asked that the council consider a citywide moratorium on all new nonresidential construction, including hotels, and any increased floor-area ratio for existing nonresidential construction.

Citing unprecedented development and congestion, historic under-investment in the neighborhood, the presence of "sensitive populations" and proximity to major roadways, they also ask that the council consider a moratorium on residential development in District 1 — the area of the city on the Bay side of U.S. 101 — for all housing projects larger than 100 units, as well as for any increases in FAR for developments over 100 units. Among the "sensitive populations" in District 1 are those vulnerable to displacement due to the lack of affordable housing, such as seniors, and youth who they say don't have access to quality education.

They said that they're asking for the moratorium in order to ensure that the city's general plan update and El Camino Real/Downtown Specific Plan "reflect current community values" and address "opportunities and challenges."

"Our definition of a moratorium is to allow us to step back and look at the City's goals and quality of life for residents — here is where we are, now how do we fix it?" they wrote.

They want the city to further evaluate the city's jobs-housing imbalance. They also want the council to consider rezoning some commercial areas to be residential, upzoning current housing in some areas, and promoting residential and retail mixed-use development as well as passing a citywide housing affordability policy.

They also ask for a study of how each type of development impacts access to education, community services, emergency services, clean water and air, as well as traffic and public transit impacts.

If the council decides to move forward with the moratorium, the city attorney may be asked to draft an ordinance to be considered at a future meeting.

The proposal comes at a time when the city is seeing an uptick in large commercial development proposals.

Since the city's El Camino Real/Downtown Specific Plan was approved in 2012, about 84% of the 474,000 square feet of net new noncommercial development the plan permits has already been claimed by developers, and about 72% of the permitted 680 new housing units have received entitlements, according to an April report.

Growth in the city's Bay side has been even faster: Within two years of the city's general plan update being completed, which upzoned much of the city's Bay side, developers have submitted proposals for five projects that cumulatively represent more than the 1.3-million-square-foot maximum of office space the plan permits.

One of those projects is Facebook's Willow Village proposal, which continues to move forward.


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.


Register now!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

More info