Should these candidates be elected they will have a perceived conflict of interest and would ethically recuse themselves from any involvement in contract negotiations with the Teamsters. This result is not a good scenario for either the union or the Town.
One question in the endorsement questionnaire that the APOA asked all candidates to complete was:
"Do you believe in protecting police officers' retirement plans and health benefits regardless of state and/or city budget deficits?"
One might first question the chutzpah of the union in asking such a question, including the phrase "regardless of state and/or city budget deficits." The answer to this question is supposedly confidential, but is there much doubt as to how these candidates answered? While the tactics of the APOA may be legal they are, in my opinion, unethical and the endorsed candidates have been tainted. These candidates have publicly stressed transparency and ethics. How much hypocritical behavior, even on the local level, does our society now condone?
This Atherton election should be about representing all residents on many difficult issues and not electing candidates who may be perceived to be in the pocket of any one interest group, including the APOA.
This story contains 370 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.