Then Menlo Park decided to make a comprehensive review of the specific plan, starting with a Planning Commission meeting on Sept. 9.
Now, according to Greenheart representative Bob Burke, plans are on hold until the company sees what happens with the review. The company is considering building a mix of ground-level retail, apartments and office space on the parcels.
"We were very close and ready to do the project, and now we have to see how that goes," he said. "No one knows how that's going to turn out."
Mr. Burke questioned the necessity of opening the specific plan to a complete overhaul after the city spent five years and held dozens of public meetings to create it.
"It's very sad. It's very, very disconcerting, in our opinion. (The specific plan) is one of the reason we came here and decided to invest in this community," he said, since developers would know what the rules were and how to comply.
While a review is always a good idea, he said, because there are always minor tweaks to make when things happen that a city didn't anticipate, the potential for a major overhaul "makes you say, wait a minute, why would anybody want to propose (projects) now?"
A group of residents citing traffic and housing impacts has led the charge against the current specific plan after Stanford University and developer John Arrillaga proposed building an eight-acre mixed-use complex along 300 to 500 El Camino Real that met the plan's baseline criteria without triggering public benefit requirements.
Another project that waited for passage of the specific plan is moving forward.
Howard Crittenden told the Almanac in December that he planned to turn his Park Theatre property, located at 1275 El Camino Real, into office space and retail. With the specific plan in place, the remaining obstacle was the historic nature of the theater, he said.
According to the city, that obstacle has now been removed. Menlo Park asked VerPlanck Historic Preservation Consulting earlier this year to evaluate whether the theater, built during the 1940s, still qualified as a historic building, given the numerous changes made during past decades, including the removal of a sign, plaster finishes and ornamentation, as well as the remodeling of the concessions stand.
The consultant concluded that the building no longer counted as historic per national criteria, according to a letter from Arlinda Heineck, the city's community development director, to the local historical association. The association in turn said it did not have a problem with the demolition of the building.
What exactly will replace the theater remains to be seen. "No plans have been submitted for the Park Theater site. The demolition permit is still pending. We are waiting for a resubmittal by the applicant in response to plan check comments," Ms. Heineck said on Sept. 9.
Mr. Crittenden did not respond to inquiries whether his plans for the property have changed.