Town Square

Post a New Topic

Should sales taxes be increased 1/8th cent for parks and park programs?

Original post made by Richard Hine, editor of The Almanac, on Oct 26, 2006

Measure A on the San Mateo County ballot would raise $16 million a year for parks and park programs in the county. To pass, two-thirds of voters must approve it. To see the Almanac’s Voter Guide story on Measure A, click here: Web Link
To comment on this News Poll question, click on the “Add a comment” link below.

Comments (6)

Posted by The tax man
a resident of another community
on Oct 26, 2006 at 10:04 am

I'm not a fan of higher taxes, but updating and maintaining our parks is crucial.


Posted by I walk the streets
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Oct 26, 2006 at 10:50 am

To save money and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, I like to avoid driving my car unless I have to. For me to make a special trip to walk in a park, it has to be a fairly wonderful park.

I tend to relieve stress by walking to the grocery store and carrying my stuff home in a backpack. I try not to use my car on weekends.

I think global warming has to be taken seriously. Biking to a park, great. Driving to a park? I try to avoid it.

I can't recall the last time I've been to a county park. I expect I will vote no on this measure.


Posted by Outdoorswoman
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Oct 26, 2006 at 3:15 pm

Re: the commments by I walk the streets

This sales tax supports your local municipal parks -- there is doubtlessly one within walking distance of your home.

County parks will certainly benefit, but city parks will share in the largesse. I think we can all agree that a well-maintained park with working facilities benefits us all.


Posted by Wondering
a resident of another community
on Oct 26, 2006 at 5:35 pm

Where does the money come from now to maintain municipal parks?
Why look for new sources? Why add to the sales tax?


Posted by Parksuser
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Hills
on Oct 31, 2006 at 4:25 pm

Measure A will provide for all parks in the County, not to be confused with ONLY County Parks (which will also benefit). Neighborhood parks, country parks and everything in between. A dedicated funding source will ensure nicer parks for our future, and nicer parks mean nicer neighborhoods, better property values, etc. Thank you for reading this.


Posted by MP Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
on Nov 1, 2006 at 7:32 am

Dedicated funding for our parks is something San Mateo County has needed for years. Various funding sources always seem to get diverted to other uses, and our parks suffer.

As I read it, this Measure would not only provide funding for our county parks, it would also provide funding for city parks - also desperately needed.

At something like $18/household per year, this is a no-brainer. I'm voting YES on A.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

What to do if you get a noisy Rheem/Ruud heat pump water heater
By Sherry Listgarten | 15 comments | 4,415 views

Do Palo Alto city officials ever, ever have enough money?
By Diana Diamond | 45 comments | 3,268 views

Beverly Hills' hit restaurant Mírame completes the lineup at Menlo Park’s Springline
By The Peninsula Foodist | 2 comments | 2,455 views

Don't Wait Till Your Child is 42 to Say "I'm Proud of You."
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 2,358 views

Travelin’ Solo: Salvation Mountain and East Jesus
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,492 views