Town Square

Post a New Topic

Fiscal Responsibility Can't Be A Minority Thing

Original post made by Henry Riggs, Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle, on Nov 1, 2008


Last Tuesday, a lone Menlo Park councilman questioned whether our city was in a position to grant bonus pay to about a hundred temporary Union workers who just got a (small) raise. The point was not whether another $25,000/year commitment is a budget breaker (Heyward Robinson called that amount "inconsequential") but whether it's consistent with a city facing imminent new commitments at the same time as a shrinking income. That seemed pretty real, but no other council member thought fiscal restraint was due Tuesday.

What's troubling is that anyone in business knows we're in for a couple of very tough years for local government. In Menlo, we will lose additional business license, permit fees and sales tax income; the state will take part of our Redevelopment Reserves; we will likely again prop up the employee retirement system due to huge losses by CALPERS; and we haven't funded phase II of our critical El Camino/Downtown Vision. Meanwhile our current budget already projects a $1 million deficit.

So, if you knew your family income would start stepping down next month, and the furnace broke down, would you still be charging as casually on the credit card?

We need more than one lonely voice speaking honestly to what's coming. By next year - in a recession - this council will vote 4:1 to boost the UUT, burdening business as well as resident, over controlling expenses. Respectfully, we need a new voice with some solid business experience on council, and we need it soon.

Henry Riggs
Callie Lane

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by Ron Shepherd
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Nov 1, 2008 at 11:05 am

What kind of a message do you send staff by indicating $25,000 is inconsequential? The city should be edelivering services we need on a long-term, cost-effective basis. Saving $25,000 wherever you can is very important.

Like this comment
Posted by are you a psychic?
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Nov 1, 2008 at 11:22 am

Pray tell, how do you know that 4 of the current council WILL raise the UUT? Do you remember that Andy Cohen voted against it in the first place and, once it was approved, voted for lowering it to the current rate?
Yes, there are bigger issues at stake and some tough issues ahead. I'm glad that we have a council with some experience with the city's finances to wrestle with tough choices, and I'm glad that they believe in involving the community to help set priorities.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 17 comments | 4,950 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,199 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 717 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 550 views