Town Square

Post a New Topic

The Insanity Behind Prop 8

Original post made by Escalus, another community, on Apr 8, 2009

Proposition 8. Ask any citizen of California or politically minded American, and we will offer up countless opposing viewpoints, opinions, and critiques of this controversial ballot proposition. The current debates ultimately boil down to this: does legalizing same-sex marriage weaken the institution of marriage in our society? This is the question that has prompted our usually rational citizens to violently attack each other, going so far as to threaten the lives of those with differing opinions. Can such a question really warrant the actions of these extremist assailants? In this age of acceptance and tolerance, why do we find ourselves returning to the violent and destructive patterns of 11th century religious crusaders?

For, if we look at the voting record, a distinctive pattern emerges. A total of 84% of regular churchgoers voted yes on the measure. Conversely, 83% of those of us who don’t ever attend church voted against this proposition. Is it outrageous to conclude that Proposition 8 was mainly a battle of our religious principles? If so, the question becomes not: does legalizing same-sex marriage weaken the institution of marriage, but did this proposition belong on a California ballot in the first place?

In 1802, Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to a group of Baptists confirming that the constitution builds, “a wall of separation between Church and State.” Seeing as the issue of same-sex marriage is rooted so deeply in the teachings of different faiths, can California truly create an amendment to our constitution concerning it? Such an amendment would have far reaching effects: it would compromise our rights to what we believe, damage the lifestyles of many same-sex couples, and even take away the current rights of those same-sex couples who are already married. Should a religious group be able to do this to the rest of us in California society?

To conclude, the issue of same-sex marriage is very personal. The government cannot take away a person’s god-given rights on religious basis, or any other. An issue such as this, with a strong founding in religion, should not come to a vote. The California Supreme Court’s decision regarding the legality of this amendment should be released in mid-June. Let us hope that it will be the right one. And if not, it is time for us to do something about it. A government that blatantly ignores the rights of the people is no government at all.

Comments (1)

Like this comment
Posted by menlocitizen
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Apr 8, 2009 at 4:22 pm

I look froward to seeing what the court decides. This Escalus person-- I agree with him.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 17 comments | 4,413 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 983 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 482 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 422 views