Town Square

Post a New Topic

City to negotiate waste-collection contract

Original post made on Sep 24, 2009

The city of Menlo Park will begin negotiations on a contract with a new waste management provider to take over collection services in 2011.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, September 24, 2009, 11:15 AM

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by Garbage
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Sep 24, 2009 at 11:52 am

10 years is too long a period to sign.


Like this comment
Posted by Citywide Collection Day
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 24, 2009 at 3:31 pm

The citywide collection day worked well in SF. While some might find it objectionable, it was a good opportunity for scavengers to come around and collect stuff all at once, which was then presumably recycled by being resold, rather then ending up in a landfill.


Like this comment
Posted by Tracy Austin
a resident of another community
on Sep 24, 2009 at 3:35 pm

10 years may or may not be too long for a contract for your community. However, in the spirit of being a good neighbor, you may want to find out if Recology would plan to dump your trash and non-recyclables in a small Nevada community as part of the 5000 TONS of trash, per week, 5 days per week for 95 years they plan to haul in from the general bay area. 95 years is a REALLY long time. Most of my friends and family in the bay area don't want any part of this type of plan.

Check it out: www.nevadansagainstgarbage.com , join the face book group Web Link follow desertplaya on twitter and tweet your views using #noCAtrashinNV


Like this comment
Posted by top dog
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Sep 24, 2009 at 6:10 pm

I think 5 years is long enough. not 10.


Like this comment
Posted by MOE
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 28, 2009 at 1:26 pm

If it's a good contract (Devil's in the details) 10 years may be OK with an option to review after 5 yaears.


Like this comment
Posted by Green resident
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 28, 2009 at 1:37 pm

If Recology can offer a better service: i.e. more recyclable items, food scraps, etc. - that is great.
However:
1. Length of contract is a concern. I'd prefer 3 years and a review period, with an option to extend.
2. Will it cost me more? I am concerned that costs will be passed on to us, the residents...
3. Where/how they process the waste and recyclables? Which landfill? How are they planning to use the recyclables (I hope none gets dumped as garbage...).


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 4,191 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 959 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 407 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 382 views