Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, January 14, 2014, 4:38 PM
Town Square
Atherton council may be near deal on Little League park facilities
Original post made on Jan 15, 2014
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, January 14, 2014, 4:38 PM
Comments (3)
a resident of Menlo-Atherton High School
on Jan 15, 2014 at 9:18 am
> The approval of Measure M cleared the way for M-A Little
> League to build permanent covered seating for 200
> spectators (a structure that will include covered dugouts),
This is a very misleading statement. The measure did NOT "clear the way" for seating 200 spectators. Here is the measure that was voted upon:
“Should the Town permit the Menlo-Atherton Little League to improve the baseball field and surrounding areas at Holbrook-Palmer Park,
including covered seating for spectators, an improved playing area for children, and new restrooms for all park users, using private funds
only?”
I voted FOR the above measure, both because I think some improvement for the park AS A WHOLE was good for all, and that any changes would not adversely affect usage for other, equally worthy groups. And I voted for the measure because the "impartial analysis" pointed out that LL would still be bound by the the planning committee.
But it makes no guarantees that LL can build a structure that can seat 200 spectators. And it makes no guarantees that seats will be 36-inches wide (!!!!!), which is double the typical size for seating. And I hope the planning committee and the council hold their ground on permanent fencing.
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Jan 15, 2014 at 1:18 pm
This seems like good news even to this Alpine Little League parent/coach. The article did not mention whether the outfield fence would be permanent. I have mixed feelings about that but a movable fence (semi-permanent for just baseball season) would be ideal because HP park is such a wonderful large space it would be a shame to have it divided all year long. St. Francis uses such a fence if anyone is interested.
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jan 15, 2014 at 8:55 pm
I am a big supporter of little league but the size and scope of this grandstand is not what we voted for. Their is no need to have a grandstand that big or to keep equipment underneath. It will be out of proportion with the character of the park and only be used for 4 months a year. I hope the city counsel keeps their focus on the long term benifits of open space and looks to build a nice, safe, reasonably sized ball park for all to enjoy.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.
Holiday Fun in San Francisco- Take the Walking Tour for An Evening of Sparkle!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 2,472 views
Pacifica’s first brewery closes its doors
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 2,279 views
Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,676 views
Support local families in need
Your contribution to the Holiday Fund will go directly to nonprofits supporting local families and children in need. Last year, Almanac readers and foundations contributed over $300,000.