Town Square

Post a New Topic

Atherton: Buckheit lawsuit saga appears to be over

Original post made on May 24, 2014

A May 20 federal appeals court decision is likely to close the door on the four-and-a-half-year fight involving an Atherton resident's lawsuit against the town of Atherton, three of its officers, and the county over the resident's 2008 arrest.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, May 23, 2014, 4:26 PM

Comments (10)

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on May 24, 2014 at 8:58 am

When you think about story, think about how different this could have turned out if Jon Buckheit was given a copy of his own police report by his own police department the first time he went in person and asked for it.

How different it would have been if District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe investigated and charged a police officer once he had personal knowledge of a crime being committed against Mr. Jon Buckheit.

Just a couple of things to think about.

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 27, 2014 at 12:26 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Congratulations John on your perseverance and your patience. Your lawsuit has helped to protect the right of all citizens to seek redress from government without fear of financial penalty.

Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of another community
on May 27, 2014 at 12:40 pm

I am glad that this has finally been resolved fairly. Best wishes to the victim, Mr. Buckheit.

I am sorry to be so retro here, but I've never understood *why* Buckheit was arrested when he called the police and he was the victim. I understand that that is rather unusual for a man to call. What happened to the girlfriend? Was she ever held accountable for her actions? Can anyone point me toward a news source that goes into detail about the original incident?

Like this comment
Posted by MLK
a resident of Atherton: other
on May 27, 2014 at 2:23 pm

To Hmmm, here is an article regarding the investigation of the Atherton police department for misconduct after falsifying the police report detailing Buckheit's arrest:

Atherton asks D.A. to investigate police misconduct charge | News | Almanac Online |
Web Link

I never saw the results of that investigation, I wonder if anyone knows how it came out? After rereading news of the scandal with Greg Munks, and the fact that he was never properly investigated or called to account for his misconduct, I'm beginning to get the impression that some people in this county are above the law.

Like this comment
Posted by Renee Batti
associate editor of The Almanac
on May 27, 2014 at 2:45 pm

Renee Batti is a registered user.

Here's another article that might shed some light on the arrest.

Web Link

From the article:
"The domestic violence incident occurred on the night of Oct. 19, 2008. Mr. Buckheit called the police for help, reporting that he had been assaulted by his then-girlfriend, who lived at the residence. Although Mr. Buckheit was the person with visible injuries, he was arrested. The District Attorney's Office soon after decided not to file charges after reviewing the case.

Months later, when Mr. Buckheit obtained a copy of the police report after suing the town to get it, he was shocked to see that, in addition to the claim that he had assaulted his girlfriend, the report included a charge of assault against her son.

In January of this year, Mr. Buckheit was granted a declaration of factual innocence in San Mateo County Superior Court. Mr. Buckheit's Dec. 1 letter to Chief Guerra comes nearly one year after Atherton police officer Tony Dennis testified during the factual-innocence court proceedings that, although the police report bore his signature, the section recommending criminal charges for assaulting the child was not written by him.

During the trial, Judge Mark Forcum stated that "there's absolutely no basis to believe that Mr. Buckheit ever laid a finger on the child," according to the court transcript."

Mr. Buckheit has maintained throughout this episode that he was arrested, even though he had visible physical injuries, because Atherton police follow a policy designed by the county that ultimately favors women in domestic disputes between men and women.

Like this comment
Posted by MLK
a resident of Atherton: other
on May 27, 2014 at 2:55 pm

To Hmmm, I realize the article I linked doesn't explain why Jon Buckheit was arrested after he called the police to report that he was the victim of domestic violence. I read that his girlfriend had a child who was with her when the police arrived, and that to arrest and detain the mother would have meant waiting for child protective services to come and take custody of the child. It was late in the day, and they would have had a long wait under those circumstances. To be charitable, the police were saving the child the trauma of being separated from it's mother, to be uncharitable, the police were saving themselves some time & trouble. I don't know the truth, but in the end, they falsified the police report, and that's illegal. None of the adults in this scenario were covering themselves in glory from my point of view.

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on May 27, 2014 at 5:19 pm

Menlo Voter is a registered user.


what you didn't mention is that it was determined who falsified the report and after Guerra was forced to "resign" the officer that falsified the report "retired."

Through it all our illustrious corrupt DA knew about this and yet did noting to charge the officer with falsifying a police report. Anyone wonder why we have corruption in this county?

Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of another community
on May 27, 2014 at 5:48 pm

Hmmm is a registered user.

My thanks to everyone who offered the missing info to me. I do recall the child being there, and I do recall Buckheit being wrongly arrested. I know that removing a child from their parent is traumatic, but this happens all of the time when men are arrested for various violent offenses. To create an arrest record for an innocent person who was a victim is appalling.

I am truly trying, late in the game, to understand the mindset of idiots who would arrest a man after he was assaulted by his partner, if he in turn didn't commit an assault. It is amazingly unintelligent to think that they'd get away with this type of error. Of course, I see profiling a based on race and gender, but this is a whole other level of lazy meets corrupt. And obviously, factoring in our DA, no wonder the authorities thought that they could get away with this.

I wish Mr. Buckheit a peaceful, fair future.

Like this comment
Posted by pogo
a resident of Woodside: other
on May 27, 2014 at 9:41 pm

pogo is a registered user.

Congratulations to Mr. Buckheit, of course.

But I'd like you all to imagine if you did not have the financial resources or fortitude to pursue this as Mr. Buckheit did.

What those APD officers did was wrong on several levels.

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on May 28, 2014 at 11:34 am

Michael G. Stogner is a registered user.

Pogo is right,

"But I'd like you all to imagine if you did not have the financial resources or fortitude to pursue this as Mr. Buckheit did."

One thing for sure you would have is an arrest record for something you didn't do.

Thank You Jon Buckheit for shining the light on a dark subject.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 10 comments | 2,310 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,251 views


Readers' Choice ballot is here

It’s time to decide what local business is worthy of the title “Almanac Readers' Choice” — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of The Almanac.