Actually, about TWO-THIRDS of voters in those states say that Ms. Clinton is not honest or trustworthy. My original post mistakenly reversed the percentage.

I just can't believe that people would suggest the words 'honesty and leadership' as an indirect attribute for Bush, Rubio or Walker. There is a 'perception of lacking' those characteristics, and then theres a level of malicious incompetence that's illustrated by Walker and Bush.

Rubio's just a young zealot who speaks Spanish, the limit of his CV.

really:

I can't believe anyone would associate the words honesty and leadership with Hillary. She has to be the most dishonest, arrogant ass to ever run for president.

really -

It would be incorrect to conclude "that people would SUGGEST [my emphasis] the words 'honesty and leadership' as an indirect attribute for Bush, Rubio or Walker." The poll did not ask that question and the article made no such inference.

The article spoke about those attributes ONLY with regard to Hillary Clinton.

"In Colorado, only 34% of voters said they see Clinton as honest and trustworthy while 62% said they don't. In Iowa, the numbers were 33% to 59% -- a drop from 45% to 47% in April. And in Virginia, Clinton did best, at 39% saying they trust her to 55% saying they don't."

Those are pretty stunning numbers and may explain her challenges. As I said, the election is a long way away and she has plenty of time to address this shortcoming and the Republicans have an equal amount of time to implode.