What 'public benefits' should developers provide in Menlo Park? | Town Square | Almanac Online |

Town Square

Post a New Topic

What 'public benefits' should developers provide in Menlo Park?

Original post made on Mar 24, 2016

The Menlo Park community is invited tonight to weigh in on this question: In exchange for permission to build higher and larger structures than permitted by the city's base zoning rules, what should developers give back to the city?

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, March 24, 2016, 11:42 AM

Comments (8)

18 people like this
Posted by Enuff
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 24, 2016 at 12:54 pm

The benefit I'd like to see from developers is to refrain from inflicting high-density urban office parks and multi-story housing projects on our lovely, safe, tranquil suburban community.
No so-called "public benefit" can ever make up for the permanent public detriment of foisting these out-of-scale, unsightly buildings on our city--huge projects of 400,000 sq ft or more, that so clearly do not belong in a small residential community of some 30,000 people.
A City Council worthy of the name would not permit such projects in downtown Menlo Park.

14 people like this
Posted by Samia
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Mar 24, 2016 at 1:24 pm

Totally agree with Enuff. Please scale down projects, plant more trees, and leave more open space.

7 people like this
Posted by Bette
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 24, 2016 at 1:28 pm

More low income housing. Believe there are gifted developers in area that could create artistic living spaces with their special architectural acumen.
Suggest work of Architect Christopher Alexander who has planned communities in Mexcio and other areas that meet the needs of human psyches.

Also consider closing off downtown to traffic. This was prevalent in German cities and creates a wonderful means of connection. Would be a phenomenal respite for those spending time stuck in traffic jams.

Downtown Menlo Park is exquisite with the trees. Caution needed not to lose
precious space.

Like this comment
Posted by Belle Havener
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Mar 24, 2016 at 1:41 pm

Low income housing is a great idea! Let's put all of it on the west side though to balance it out. We need a grocery store and other retail and entertainment on the east side, not more low income housing. I'm tired of planning my grocery shopping trips around rush hour.

2 people like this
Posted by MPer
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 24, 2016 at 2:49 pm

how about making them 1) build a parking ramp 2) fix the sidewalks 3) have public access to open space with the development.

Doing nothing is why MP has a dilapidated but very expensive downtown in the first place. People want a vibrant downtown with more restaurants and bars, maybe less thrift stores. Let make developers pay for it!

2 people like this
Posted by menlo resident
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Mar 24, 2016 at 3:37 pm

What developers can do is have some respect for Menlo Park residents by not making a larger mess of our city by breaking our zoning laws...which are there for this very reason. And no, I'm not anti-development.

I sure hope our council and government haven't already promised developers that they can go bigger and higher.

Here's my prediction: more impact on the east side, more perks on the west side.

2 people like this
Posted by Anneke
a resident of another community
on Mar 26, 2016 at 10:24 am

Public Benefits Developers can provide: Keep it simple! Stick with the existing building rules and make sure you provide adequate parking.

4 people like this
Posted by No to Ohtaki
a resident of another community
on Mar 26, 2016 at 4:00 pm

Much of the building we see in existing transportation corridors is the work of regional groups most citizens know nothing about (such as Plan Bay Area and the Grand Boulevard Initiative task force). Councilmember (and now Assembly candidate) Peter Ohtaki knows about those unelected groups. He is one of regionalists working to advance special interests against existing residents. I say No to Ohtaki.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get fact-based reporting on the COVID-19 crisis sent to your inbox daily.

Palo Alto's Mayfield Bakery & Cafe permanently closes after 11-year run
By Elena Kadvany | 18 comments | 15,031 views

City staff is running Palo Alto
By Diana Diamond | 24 comments | 3,165 views

Couples: Are you Committed to your Vows or Dysfunction?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,473 views

Kids and sugar: A cautionary tale
By Sherry Listgarten | 9 comments | 1,389 views

Preparing for School
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 530 views