2 - Will new out of district students be counted as increased enrollments under Measure C thereby causing every parcel to pay an additional tax for these out of District students?
3 - Why is the debt service for the $23 million bond measure (2013) not included in per student expenditure?
4 - Why have FIVE parcel taxes than NEVER expire rather than ONE consolidated parcel tax?
5 - Why not have that consolidated parcel tax be subject to renewal by the voters on a periodic basis?
6 - Why assume unrealistically low property tax revenues increases?
7 - How many out of district children of MPCSD staff are currently enrolled in MPCSD schools?
8 - At $17k per student what is the cost of this benefit?
9 - Where does this expense show up in the MPCSD budget?
- Is it included in the $7 million+ Benefits line item?
10 - Is this benefit reflected in the compensation analysis of the staff?
11 - Is this benefit taxable income to the recipients?
12 - There are 58 non-Tinsley, no-Ravenwood students at MPCSD that come from outside the District. At the claimed $17k/student who is paying the $1 million/year cost of these students?