Town Square

Post a New Topic

Eric, Wendy Schmidt to move family ventures to new Menlo Park building

Original post made on May 18, 2016

Eric and Wendy Schmidt of Atherton plan to build a three-story, 25,000 square-foot office building in Menlo Park to serve as headquarters for their family office and philanthropic operations.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, May 18, 2016, 7:51 AM

Comments (13)

Posted by whatever
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 18, 2016 at 9:43 am

So why was the Schmidt ownership and purpose of the development kept secret?
Does the 501c3 status of the Schmidt Foundation exempt it from property taxes?
If so what are the loses to the city, our public schools and the fire district? Shouldn't there be a major charge to the project for its impact on the already horrendous traffic mess on the Ravenswood Ave corridor?


Posted by Not green
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 18, 2016 at 11:46 am

Why is it that uber rich people, who claim to be proponents of the environment, live in enormous houses and build large office buildings where smaller structures once stood. If they cared so much about the environment they'd live more modestly and not feel a need to build monuments to themselves.

Someone please explain to me how it's "green" to dig a giant pit in the earth so cars will have a nice place to park, when the building will stand just across from the train station? Why not encourage their employees to take the train? Shameful.


Posted by Roy Thiele-Sardi�a
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 18, 2016 at 12:09 pm

Roy Thiele-Sardi�a is a registered user.

@Not Green

The number of parking spaces is MANDATED by Menlo Park. Trust me NOBODY wants to pay to dig a hole and make parking....it's required.

Roy Thiele-Sardina


Posted by David
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on May 18, 2016 at 12:30 pm

What no Starbucks? I'm sad. Best wishes to the Schmidts though.


Posted by Reader
a resident of another community
on May 18, 2016 at 12:35 pm

@Not Green:

The parking garage isn't just for employees, it's also for visitors and maintenance people. And not all of these people would find Caltrain a useful method to get to the building.

Do you think the cleaning lady is going to bring her mop, vacuum cleaner, and cleaning chemicals on Caltrain? How about the IT guy who wants to install a new router or telephone switch?

How about the person living in Woodside who needs to get to his/her desk?

And the new mother who drops off her kid at the daycare center before and after work?

Parking garages are useful for many people who run their lives differently than you do. Wake up to the fact that universe does not revolve around your dreamworld.


Posted by Dana Hendrickson
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 18, 2016 at 1:05 pm

I hope that the section of Alma in front of this building gets the best possible bike facilities as it is a key element in the planned north-south, Alma-Garwood bike corridor


Posted by Welcome to MP!
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 18, 2016 at 2:14 pm

Welcome Schmidt Family!
Thank you for choosing our little town for your wonderful endeavor. Feel free to shop in our stores, eat at our 4 restaurants and tell all your friends how nice the people of Menlo Park have been to you.


Posted by Not green
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 18, 2016 at 3:25 pm

Roy and Reader:

Where in my comments did I write there should be NO parking??? I just questioned two levels of underground parking which doesn't seem very "green." There are several businesses on Alma Lane, including a two story office building, that provide ample street level parking. This new office building will a replace a popular restaurant, nail salon, two hair salons, a laundromat, and another business that never lacked ground level parking. I know this because I live close by and cut through the parking lot on my way downtown.


Posted by MPliving21
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 18, 2016 at 3:58 pm

@ Not Green

The city developed a downtown specific plan (which sets the standards for new development in downtown) over the course of several years with an incredible amount of input from residents. With this resident feedback, the plan requires that new office developments provide a minimum of 3.8 stalls/1000 SF. In this case a 25,000 SF office building requires 95 parking stalls. Again, this requirement comes from the city plan which was developed with resident input. In order to physically build 95 parking stalls I'm sure the developer had to go down two levels for the garage. If this building was in Palo Alto, Mountain View, or Redwood City I'm sure the parking requirement would be nowhere near this amount as they have more transit friendly parking standards. Be careful calling things "shameful" when you don't have all of the information.


Posted by Otto
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on May 18, 2016 at 4:59 pm

Hmmm. Funny that there was no mention of the corporate living arrangements on the top floor that I heard was rumored to be north of $10K/month for corporate rental only. No additional affordable housing with the build. Can someone expand on this who may be in the know? Why didnt they rent that building at the corner of Watkins and ECR that was vacant for a long time? I am sure the owner of the property made a pretty penny. SMH.


Posted by Not Green
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 18, 2016 at 5:03 pm

MPliving21, the Schmidts are building a three story office building for their family's non-profit tax write-off use with no public benefit except for a small coffee shop and a few bike racks. This building replaced shops that were within walking distance of the locals who frequented them. Sitting just behind this future office building is a street lined with apartment buildings. Why couldn't the Schmidts have built something in a more industrial area? Why near the downtown which already lacks vibrancy. What is needed in that space is something that benefits the community - like a nice cafe, shops, etc, or a mixed-use office building - available for lease - with retail on the ground floor. This spot is the wrong place for a three story building dedicated to one family. Yes, it's shameful. It's nice to hear that they care so much about Nantucket though.


Posted by Otto
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on May 18, 2016 at 5:13 pm

@ Not Green - 2 MPLiving21 -0

So why build something that requires 95 parking stalls in the first place that would benefit only one building? Why not a mixed use where there are boutique shops, restaurants, small businesses that define MP. Who cares what they do in PA, MV, RWC. Perhaps a mini version of T&C Menlo Park style.
Have you seen downtown RWC? Especially that uber ugly Box building. What a travesty.
Simply, money talks (taxes paid that is a write off for one family). BS walks. Period.


Posted by pearl
a resident of another community
on May 18, 2016 at 8:05 pm

pearl is a registered user.

What?!?! There aren't at least a couple of affordable housing units for seniors included in this building?!? Shame, shame, shame!!!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

James Beard Award winning chef Traci Des Jardins' restaurant el Alto abruptly closes its doors in Los Altos months after highly anticipated opening
By The Peninsula Foodist | 3 comments | 7,694 views

Palo Alto's bold proposal to jumpstart home electrification
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 4,012 views

San Bruno Wins Food Trend Craze with First Plant-Based Gas Mart
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 2,306 views

The Benefits of Adding Market-Rate Housing in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 13 comments | 1,789 views

How Much Time do You Spend Outdoors?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,632 views