Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors unanimously voted on Tuesday, July 26, to place a measure on the Nov. 8 ballot that would add 20 years to the remaining six years of a half-cent sales tax approved by the county’s voters in 2012.

The tax is considered a general tax because it can be spent on any county expenses, and needs approval by a simple majority, at least one more than 50 percent of those who vote.

The supervisors say they hope the tax will be able to help the county fund projects that would increase the supply of affordable housing.

Supervisor Don Horsley said the sales tax funds have so far been “transformational,” funding projects such as student literacy, transit for those with disabilities, a response to sea level rise, health care for farm laborers, paying down the county’s retirement liabilities and improvements in police and fire dispatch facilities.

The sales tax money has allowed the county “to do so many things that we otherwise would not have been able to do,” he said.

Other supervisors said the sales tax money has been used for enhancing parks and libraries and providing mental health services for students.

Board President Warren Slocum said extending the tax “provides a predictable revenue stream for San Mateo County” so it can continue to fund the types of projects that the tax has so far been used for.

The sales tax extension was not the funding source the supervisors had initially wanted. They had discussed putting a $500 million housing bond measure on the ballot, and the possibility of an additional sales tax.

But initial polling said the $500 million bond measure wouldn’t gain the two-thirds majority vote needed for passage. Research also showed that a new sales tax isn’t possible because the county’s sales tax rate is already the maximum allowed by the state.

A pollster hired by the county found that even a smaller bond measure had little chance of passage. Polling showed that the sales tax extension, by contrast, received much more support than it needed to pass.

See the board meeting agenda and staff reports on the county’s website.

The county has a webpage devoted to the current sales tax.

Related stories: ● Supervisors move toward sales tax ballot measure.

● County attempts to take on housing crisis.

Join the Conversation

16 Comments

  1. Measure A funds were supposed to be spent on essentials. Instead they have been used e.g. for 14 hand driers in the County restrooms, grossly ugly “art” in NFO and padding the pension fund. There are so many ways that the county wastes money. A blatant example is John Maltbie’s obscene salary + pension for doing nothing.

  2. Janet and Michael, you are both correct, and the “powers to be” knew 4 years ago that this would be their plan of attack. We need to push back, then make some changes.

  3. Again, similar to the Menlo park school district, the county has wasted money and spent it on projects that are not a high priority or on projects that do not represent the bigger community as a whole. We need to make these officials show us in the next 6 years that they can spend the money wisely. The county needs to be transparent in their spending. Show us you are being fiscally responsible when you spend the money. Bring back your ballot measure in 6 years and we will decide then if it’s deserved. Vote no now and grade the county on their spending, make them earn a yes vote.

  4. Michael, if you were around in 1991, the county put a 1/2 % sales tax called The Best Schools Proposal, Measure A, which needed a simple majority. I led the campaign which resulted in a resounding defeat of the measure with NO votes over 60%.

    This tax, and the one in Belmont, should be defeated by more than that.

    Union members are taxpayers too. They do not all follow the dictates of the union leaders. Of course the vote by mail ballot may have an influence on that.

  5. I’m so glad that the government thinks residents are made out of money and taxing is the only real option to fund their projects.

    Vote NO

  6. Don’t the supervisors realize the sales tax hits lower income people the hardest! Sales taxes are highly regressive. The poorer you are and the more dependents you have, the higher proportion of your income goes to the sales tax.

    On the other hand, income tax, property tax, and bond repayments through property tax bills are progressive taxes. High income earners and wealthy people tend to pay a higher percentage of these taxes.

    If you raise taxes on the poor, you are contributing to the affordability problem, not helping it.

Leave a comment