Town Square

Post a New Topic

Enrollment continues to dip in area schools

Original post made on Sep 19, 2018

Enrollment slightly declined this school year for local elementary school districts, continuing a recent area trend. The drop, local experts say, is due to the migration of young families from the area to find more affordable housing.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 19, 2018, 11:08 AM

Comments (14)

8 people like this
Posted by Danarama
a resident of Woodside School
on Sep 19, 2018 at 12:29 pm

Danarama is a registered user.

Any idea how this compares to enrollment in private schools in the area?


2 people like this
Posted by Neilson Buchanan
a resident of another community
on Sep 19, 2018 at 1:21 pm

Neilson Buchanan is a registered user.

Hmmm... "Hotbed" seems to be a misnomer in these towns.


14 people like this
Posted by No on Measure Z
a resident of Portola Valley: other
on Sep 19, 2018 at 1:46 pm

Less pupils yet the PVSD wants to spend $49.5 million on new buildings with Measure Z? How much does the the lower enrollment figure equate with the spending per pupil now? In line with Neilson's comment above, parents are too stressed out earning money to pay all the extra taxes, to think about rearing more children to use the shiny new makerspaces.


9 people like this
Posted by Definitely NO on Z
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Sep 19, 2018 at 5:15 pm

Let's not forget that the "49.5 million" is actually only part one of the plan for two separate bonds, two years apart, totaling 70 million dollars. This does not seem to include the money already spent on the consultant company, the architects, etc. They are also not advertising that the current architectural design would call for removing part of the newly installed playground. Or has this changed?


4 people like this
Posted by No to elitiZm
a resident of Portola Valley: other
on Sep 19, 2018 at 5:56 pm

Why can't we opt just to maintain the PVSD buildings for $11 million, instead of bond measures which will exceed $70 million for schools where enrollment is dropping? How can PV stomach this brand of elitism when other school districts are suffering from lack of books, teachers, safe buildings? Where is their social conscience? I want to choose where I spend my $$, not be forced to donate via a badly advised bond measure to a district that can waste money, without checks or balances, on things that have little relevance, in the big picture, on kids' education.


8 people like this
Posted by resident mp
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 19, 2018 at 10:07 pm

It's time to consider a merger. Tiny districts cannot offer what larger districts can offer and in addition to cost savings, the students would benefit by having more choices/programs, as long as the quality control remains.

When will the community take a consolidating districts?


4 people like this
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Sep 20, 2018 at 11:51 am

Jack Hickey is a registered user.

Danarama asked:
"Any idea how this compares to enrollment in private schools in the area?"
Hopefully they have gone up.

These District's could definitely afford to encourage "choice" by offering to fund a portion of private school tuition for those choosing to remove their children from the district. As the article notes: "Little of their funding depends on enrollment, so dropping enrollment actually means there are more funds available per student."

See: Web Link


4 people like this
Posted by Yet More Of The Same Nonsense
a resident of another community
on Sep 20, 2018 at 3:59 pm

Back riding *that* dead horse again, Hickey?

It's amazing how you are willing to swallow what Betsy DeVos puts out. Of course, you and DeVos are out to destroy the public education system -- which should be a concern to all clear-thinking people out there.


9 people like this
Posted by jakjak
a resident of Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
on Sep 20, 2018 at 4:12 pm

JAck wants vouchers, which are just welfare for affluent families that will send their kids to private school, anyway.

Jack loves the welfare state, as long as it is for the rich and for corporations.

Yay Jack! Keep fighting for the wealthy!


5 people like this
Posted by Georgia
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Sep 20, 2018 at 10:29 pm

Vouchers would be really good. They would let people like me send there children to private schools. Vouchers help us much more than the 1%


4 people like this
Posted by Charter advocate
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 21, 2018 at 12:28 pm

Charter advocate is a registered user.

Being against vouchers is the politically correct way that "progressives" justify keep poorer children in their failing schools.

Families that live in poorer neighborhoods with failing schools would love to have a way to be able to send their kids to a better school. Anti-charter, anti-voucher advocates say too bad for you.


13 people like this
Posted by jakjak
a resident of Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
on Sep 21, 2018 at 12:39 pm

"Anti-charter, anti-voucher advocates say too bad for you."

Nice try. We say fund all schools to support all our children, not give a few bucks as welfare for private school attendees.

We say charters are fine, with appropriate regulation, transparency and accountability.

Otherwise, charters can be phenomenally bad for students, as fraudsters rake in money off the top.


Just in California:

"Report: Fraud and waste in California’s charter schools
3/1/2018
By In the Public Interest

Public funding of California’s charter schools now tops $6 billion annually. Despite this substantial investment, governments at all levels are unable to proactively monitor the private groups that operate charter schools for fraud and waste. Most public school districts aren’t given adequate resources to oversee operators, especially large charter management organizations (CMOs), while all lack the statutory authority to effectively monitor and hold charter schools accountable.

This report builds on existing research to show that, due to this lack of oversight, an untold amount of public funding is being lost each year. Only the tip of the iceberg is visible, but this much is known: total alleged and confirmed fraud and waste in California’s charter schools has reached over $149 million."


and


Last month in Oakland:

"They allege that Hatipoglu surreptitiously changed his employment contract to provide himself with three years' worth of severance pay totaling about $450,000, an unusually large sum for a small school with an annual budget of approximately $3 million. His previous contract provided for only six months of severance pay, a standard in the education sector."


4 people like this
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Sep 21, 2018 at 12:44 pm

Jack Hickey is a registered user.

The biggest fraud is STSRS and CalPers "defined benefit" pensions.


4 people like this
Posted by Yet More Of The Same Nonsense
a resident of another community
on Sep 21, 2018 at 3:35 pm

No, Hickey -- the biggest fraud happens to be you.

And the fact that you're running for re-election -- AFTER you said you wouldn't -- shows how much of a fraud you happen to be.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

DoorDash is opening a shared delivery kitchen in Redwood City. What does that say about the future of the restaurant industry?
By Elena Kadvany | 9 comments | 3,221 views

What did you learn last week?
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 1,871 views

Menlo Park Can Learn A Lot from Palo Alto (Part 1)
By Dana Hendrickson | 3 comments | 1,190 views

Bond. Bond Touch.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 937 views

The holiday season
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 800 views