Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, January 21, 2019, 9:14 AM
Town Square
Guest opinion: Rethinking Stanford's development plan
Original post made on Jan 21, 2019
Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, January 21, 2019, 9:14 AM
Comments (1)
a resident of another community
on Jan 21, 2019 at 1:39 pm
Neilson Buchanan is a registered user.
These observations are welcomed and suggest better outcomes are possible but elusive. The three primary parties..Stanford, County and Palo Alto/Menlo Park should be not willing to move forward without rising above the mundane, mandated mechanics of EIR and vague TDMs.
Better engineering skills and common sense are readily available. The question is who wants to take a higher road. Even if Stanford optimizes its growth, the "non-Stanford" power holders remain in full-throttle job/housing imbalance and lost productivity from congestion. Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge, both Palo Alto or Menlo Park have major vacancies in their Transportation Departments and cannot possibly respond to impact of economic success their Councils promote.
One of Parks' phrases caught my eye. "...while Stanford's neighbors are sitting in standstill traffic."
I would have illustrated a key hurdle differently. Palo Alto/Menlo Park Councils and their business communities have standstill TDMs.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.
Los Altos restaurant and lounge closes just months after opening
By The Peninsula Foodist | 6 comments | 7,316 views
Bike lanes don’t belong on El Camino!
By Diana Diamond | 27 comments | 6,005 views
Farm Bill and the Future – Final Post (part 10)
By Laura Stec | 12 comments | 2,195 views
It’s ‘International Being You’ Day
By Chandrama Anderson | 20 comments | 2,162 views
How quickly will we electrify our homes?
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 916 views