Town Square

Post a New Topic

Menlo Park: Commission to review plan to redevelop Feldman's Books site

Original post made on Mar 8, 2019

A proposal to build a three-story, nine-unit apartment building where Feldman's Books and a youth mental health clinic sit now will head to the Menlo Park Planning Commission for a study session Monday, March 11.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 8, 2019, 11:56 AM

Comments (15)

34 people like this
Posted by Mark
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Mar 8, 2019 at 12:33 pm

Not wholly unexpected but I also have an idea for a "wonderful addition to the El Camino corridor" in Menlo Park: a quality used bookstore with reasonable hours and a helpful staff. Losing Feldman's will be one more death knell in the slavish quest for "vibrancy" in this town, sadly.


28 people like this
Posted by Parent of a teen
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on Mar 8, 2019 at 1:15 pm

This would be devastating given that the current buildings house Safe Space and Bay Area Clinical Associates. This is a desperately needed community service for our kids and teens. Web Link

The current location is ideal as it's close to Menlo-Atherton, Menlo and Sacred Heart Schools - in addition to most of the schools in the Menlo Park City School District and Las Lomitas School District.

We need these vital community services. Please don't add more housing/retail space here. There are already two large housing developments underway on El Camino - one between Oak Grove and Valparaiso/Glenwood and the other between the Stanford Park Hotel and the Big 5 (across from Safeway).

- A concerned parent of a teen in therapy!


11 people like this
Posted by Planning Commission Please
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 8, 2019 at 2:22 pm

This architecture is terrible. So cheap.


20 people like this
Posted by Margo
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Mar 8, 2019 at 2:50 pm

Development???? I think not. This is not development, it's DESTRUCTION. Just because something is old and maybe doesn't make a lot of money is no reason to desrroy it. Feldman's is a great asset to Menlo Park. They've been there for many years. Their son attended Menlo Atherton (he was in my math class some years ago). They perform a great service, repurposing books---finding new people to own and love books previously owned and loved by someone who is ready to pass them on. As for the safe house---I was not aware it was there. Why in the world does anyone think it should be replaced? As a previous commenter pointed out, it's well placed near schools and provides a much needed service. Please, Planning Commission and City Council, rethink this. Find the value in what we have. Nine apartments in exchange for services we cannot replace????? Come on!!!


8 people like this
Posted by John McGraw
a resident of Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
on Mar 8, 2019 at 4:31 pm

All of you with ideas on what to do with this space should put your money where your mouth is. Buy the property and develop as you see fit. I am tired of all these meaningless ideas without any action.

If you are not will to risk your money, your arguments are meaningless.


1 person likes this
Posted by Menlo Voter.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 8, 2019 at 6:26 pm

Menlo Voter. is a registered user.

Mr. McGraw:

people are always free with other peoples' money. Always. Their own? Not so much.


7 people like this
Posted by Kate Kennedy
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Mar 9, 2019 at 12:17 am

And so continues the headlong rush to strip every last shred of character and history from Menlo Park.

This summer, we're moving to the east coast after 21 years as happy members of the Menlo Park community, and while it breaks my heart to leave this place we've loved and where we've raised our kids, I'm happy, in a way, not to have to stick around and bear witness to all this "progress."

I hope Feldman's and the youth mental health clinic live to fight another day.


4 people like this
Posted by CA Love
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Mar 9, 2019 at 6:56 am

Precious housing location currently underutilized use as bookstore?

God bless Jeff Besos, 9 more families can now live on El Camino now because of the internet. If you enjoy flipping thru books try the public library. All you NIMBY’ers give other people a chance to live in MP too.

Can’t break ground here fast enough...

These folks that are against all these projects sound a lot like the MAGA folks, local edition. They want to make PA and MP great again by not allowing more people to live here and keep 100+ year old grocery markets building the way it is so 9 new families can’t move here into a new possibly beautiful building.


11 people like this
Posted by P. Anders
a resident of Atherton: other
on Mar 9, 2019 at 9:33 am

Yes, Menlo Park. Great idea. The best way to solve our overcrowding problem is to add more people/housing/commercial space. Bravo!


Like this comment
Posted by Beth
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 9, 2019 at 11:22 am

CA love.

You can't always get what you want. There's been plenty of housing built already in MP and will be more. Housing for this little amount of people is nothing toward solving a housing problem.

Ask the developers why they've built so many corporate places along 101 rather than housing? They're the ones who can make housing units happen.

Think beyond your self and find what works, which might mean sacrifice. I couldn't afford this area, so lived in Oakland and commuted to south Palo Alto 5 days a week for 4 years. Big deal. Getting through difficult situations isn't all bad, by long shot, and if you're hellbent to live in MP, then you've got big bucks already to even THINK of living here. Just might not happen right away.


Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Boomer
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Mar 9, 2019 at 11:30 am

What, no! "Building housing" is one of those things I want Menlo Park to ~say~ it's going to do, not something it actually ~does~.


2 people like this
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Mar 9, 2019 at 2:58 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Concerned citizens need to realize that the decision as to what could be built on this site was made when the DSP was adopted by the City Council - after years of discussion, debate and a ballot measure. Now is too late to decide that what is proposed is inappropriate.


10 people like this
Posted by really?
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 9, 2019 at 5:38 pm

Mediocre design on a much loved street front. Let's hope planning commission stands up to this.


6 people like this
Posted by Arm chair opinions
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Mar 9, 2019 at 7:31 pm

Agree with all the comments about Safe Space. This is a relatively new and extremely important, needed, valued addition to the community. If it is forced to relocate, I hope the owners are able to find a similarly convenient, and visible location.

Regarding housing, Menlo Park needs to figure out how to offer affordable housing to teachers before allowing more 2 bedroom (and larger) apartments that could result in more school children.

Regarding aesthetics, at least the proposed design is only 3 stories, has some decent articulation, doesn't have metal bars running in front of the windows, and uses some wood that doesn't look artificial or like particle board , as opposed to the Glenwood facing facade of the Park James hotel building, that is truly an eyesore (with the exception of the street level stone, wood fencing and planter boxes). Shocked the planning commission allowed a completely flat face, with barred windows! (Planning Commission members, if you're reading this, please don't approve something like that again - and if you're going to allow a 4th floor, don't allow a light to run up the top floor that stays on all night and is visible to the nearby residential neighborhoods !)


4 people like this
Posted by Progressive
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 10, 2019 at 11:03 am

Now if we can only redevelop the crappy line of businesses across the street we might have something.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Palo Alto's Taverna to expand next door
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 1,880 views

What Would it Take to Get Tech Companies to Move Jobs Out of the Region and Is This a Good Idea?
By Steve Levy | 27 comments | 1,772 views

A Power Play
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 1,663 views

Premarital and Couples: Valentine's Day: Annually or Daily?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,001 views

Piles of artwork
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 641 views

 

The Almanac Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "The Almanac Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 27th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 17th issue of The Almanac.

VOTE HERE